Literature DB >> 15476654

Robotically assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: an assessment of its contemporary role in the surgical management of localized prostate cancer.

Joseph A Smith1.   

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy has maintained a cardinal role in the treatment of localized carcinoma of the prostate. The combination of refinements in surgical technique and better definition of the anatomy have decreased the morbidity from surgery. Nonetheless, concerns about treatment-related side effects remain the primary limitation of surgical therapy for prostate cancer. Laparoscopic prostatectomy, with or without robotic assistance, is playing an increasing role in surgical treatment of prostate cancer. However, the minimally invasive aspect of laparoscopy may have less relevance for radical prostatectomy because the open surgical procedure requires a limited infraumbilical incision. In the present series comparing robotically assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with open radical retropubic prostatectomy, no difference was seen in postoperative pain, length of stay, or requirement for blood replacement. However, the most important outcome measures are tumor control, continence, and sexual potency. The outstanding visibility and precision afforded by the robotic approach may offer advantages in each of these areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15476654     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  13 in total

1.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

2.  Best of the 2006 AUA Annual Meeting: Highlights from the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association, May 20-25, 2006, Atlanta, GA.

Authors: 
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

3.  A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Richard E Link; Sam B Bhayani; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Robotic radical prostatectomy in Australia: initial experience.

Authors:  P J O'Malley; S Van Appledorn; D M Bouchier-Hayes; H Crowe; A J Costello
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon in Taiwan: experience with the initial 30 cases.

Authors:  Yen-Chuan Ou; Chi-Rei Yang; John Wang; Chen-Li Cheng; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-08-26

6.  Trends in radical prostatectomy: centralization, robotics, and access to urologic cancer care.

Authors:  Karyn B Stitzenberg; Yu-Ning Wong; Matthew E Nielsen; Brian L Egleston; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Reverse-hybrid robotic mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  In Ja Park; Y Nancy You; Erika Schlette; Sa Nguyen; John M Skibber; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; George J Chang
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Does hospital setting post robotic fellowship training affect outcomes? A multi-institutional comparison of initial outcomes between academic and community settings.

Authors:  Maher Sraj; William T Berg; Chad Gridley; Michael Fumo; Ketan K Badani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-07-24

9.  Seminal vesicle sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using a low-energy source: Better continence and potency.

Authors:  Shrenik J Shah; Vishal Goyal; Rajesh Sachar; Arup Kumar Nath; Nitesh Jain; Kalpesh Kapadia
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009-04

10.  Robotic surgery: India is not ready yet.

Authors:  Girish G Nelivigi
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.