Literature DB >> 27628256

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon in Taiwan: experience with the initial 30 cases.

Yen-Chuan Ou1, Chi-Rei Yang2, John Wang2, Chen-Li Cheng2, Vipul R Patel3.   

Abstract

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) is an established trend in surgical treatment for localized prostate cancer in the USA; however, RALP is still in its infancy in Taiwan. We have tracked various indicators of proficiency as a single Taiwanese surgeon became familiar with the procedure through experience with 30 initial RALP surgeries using the da Vinci system between December 2005 and April 2007. Here, we report the changes in these proficiency indicators, and the short-term outcomes for the patients. Thirty consecutive patients were classified into group 1 (cases 1-15) and group 2 (cases 16-30). Preoperative clinical characteristics, including age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists anesthetic surgical risks class (ASA), prostate-specific antigen levels (PSA), and Gleason scores were similar between the groups. The clinical stage (T1/T2) was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (p = 0.028). Group 1 needed more frequent insertion of a double-J stent (60% versus 0%) before surgery and evaluation by cystogram before removal of urethral catheter (80% versus 6.7%) than group 2; these differences were statistically significant. Blood loss and transfusion rates were lower in group 2, but complication and conversion rates were higher in group 1. These differences were not statistically significant. Positive surgical margins, continence rates, potency, and intercourse rates at 12 months were similar between the groups. Console time was 262 min in group 1 and 190 min in group 2 (p = 0.033); this appeared to be the best indicator of proficiency. Establishing proficiency as determined by functional outcomes required about 30 cases, but the positive surgical margin rates indicate that experience with more than 30 cases was needed to ascend the learning curve with respect to oncological outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Robotics

Year:  2008        PMID: 27628256     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-008-0107-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  25 in total

1.  Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas E Ahlering; David Woo; Louis Eichel; David I Lee; Robert Edwards; Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Ashutosh Tewari; James O Peabody; Alok Shrivastava; Sanjeev Kaul; Akshay Bhandari; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.241

3.  [Robotic radical prostatectomy: Cornell University Technique (ART, Athermal Robotic Technique)].

Authors:  Juan I Martínez-Salamanca; Sandhya Rao; Rajan Ramanathan; Ash Tewari
Journal:  Arch Esp Urol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.436

4.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men.

Authors:  G Pasticier; J B Rietbergen; B Guillonneau; G Fromont; M Menon; G Vallancien
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Preservation of the puboprostatic collar and puboperineoplasty for early recovery of urinary continence after robotic prostatectomy: anatomic basis and preliminary outcomes.

Authors:  Atsushi Takenaka; Ashutosh K Tewari; Robert A Leung; Kevin Bigelow; Nasr El-Tabey; Gen Murakami; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a review of the current state of affairs.

Authors:  V R Patel; M F Chammas; S Shah
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution.

Authors:  A Tewari; A Srivasatava; M Menon
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 8.  The epidemiology of prostate cancer part II: the risk factors.

Authors:  O W Brawley; K Knopf; I Thompson
Journal:  Semin Urol Oncol       Date:  1998-11

9.  Robotic radical prostatectomy and the Vattikuti Urology Institute technique: an interim analysis of results and technical points.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Ashutosh Tewari
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The Ohio State University technique.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Ketul K Shah; Rahul K Thaly; Hugh Lavery
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2007-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.