Literature DB >> 15476257

Measurements of protein sequence-structure correlations.

Gavin E Crooks1, Jason Wolfe, Steven E Brenner.   

Abstract

Correlations between protein structures and amino acid sequences are widely used for protein structure prediction. For example, secondary structure predictors generally use correlations between a secondary structure sequence and corresponding primary structure sequence, whereas threading algorithms and similar tertiary structure predictors typically incorporate interresidue contact potentials. To investigate the relative importance of these sequence-structure interactions, we measured the mutual information among the primary structure, secondary structure and side-chain surface exposure, both for adjacent residues along the amino acid sequence and for tertiary structure contacts between residues distantly separated along the backbone. We found that local interactions along the amino acid chain are far more important than non-local contacts and that correlations between proximate amino acids are essentially uninformative. This suggests that knowledge-based contact potentials may be less important for structure predication than is generally believed. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15476257     DOI: 10.1002/prot.20262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  11 in total

1.  Effective knowledge-based potentials.

Authors:  Evandro Ferrada; Francisco Melo
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Use of a structural alphabet to find compatible folds for amino acid sequences.

Authors:  Swapnil Mahajan; Alexandre G de Brevern; Yves-Henri Sanejouand; Narayanaswamy Srinivasan; Bernard Offmann
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  svmPRAT: SVM-based protein residue annotation toolkit.

Authors:  Huzefa Rangwala; Christopher Kauffman; George Karypis
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Detection of allosteric signal transmission by information-theoretic analysis of protein dynamics.

Authors:  Alessandro Pandini; Arianna Fornili; Franca Fraternali; Jens Kleinjung
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Do natural proteins differ from random sequences polypeptides? Natural vs. random proteins classification using an evolutionary neural network.

Authors:  Davide De Lucrezia; Debora Slanzi; Irene Poli; Fabio Polticelli; Giovanni Minervini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Pathway and network approaches for identification of cancer signature markers from omics data.

Authors:  Jinlian Wang; Yiming Zuo; Yan-Gao Man; Itzhak Avital; Alexander Stojadinovic; Meng Liu; Xiaowei Yang; Rency S Varghese; Mahlet G Tadesse; Habtom W Ressom
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

7.  Cooperative hydrophobic core interactions in the β-trefoil architecture.

Authors:  Michael Blaber
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Random amino acid mutations and protein misfolding lead to Shannon limit in sequence-structure communication.

Authors:  Andreas Martin Lisewski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Natural protein sequences are more intrinsically disordered than random sequences.

Authors:  Jia-Feng Yu; Zanxia Cao; Yuedong Yang; Chun-Ling Wang; Zhen-Dong Su; Ya-Wei Zhao; Ji-Hua Wang; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 10.  Emerging Computational Methods for the Rational Discovery of Allosteric Drugs.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Wagner; Christopher T Lee; Jacob D Durrant; Robert D Malmstrom; Victoria A Feher; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.