Literature DB >> 15475845

Early results of the less invasive stabilization system for mechanically unstable fractures of the distal femur (AO/OTA types A2, A3, C2, and C3).

Mark Weight1, Cory Collinge.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Historically, mechanically unstable fractures of the distal femur have been difficult to treat. Problems such as varus collapse, malunion, and nonunion frequently resulted before fixed-angle plates and indirect reduction techniques were popularized. More recently, the Less Invasive Stabilization System, or LISS (Synthes, Paoli, PA), has been designed to combine these 2 approaches with the intended goals of achieving adequate stable fixation and early healing. Early clinical results for the femoral Less Invasive Stabilization System have been promising. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of patients with high energy, mechanically unstable fractures of the distal femur treated with the Less Invasive Stabilization System.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a treatment protocol, consecutive patient series.
SETTING: Busy level II trauma center. PATIENTS /PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six patients with 27 high-energy AO/OTA types A2, A3, C2, and C3 fractures of the distal femur. INTERVENTION: Treatment with indirect fracture reduction and internal distal femoral fixation using the Less Invasive Stabilization System. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and radiographic assessment.
RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with 22 fractures were available for evaluation at an average 19 months postinjury (range 12-35 months). The mechanism of injury included 12 motor vehicle collisions, 4 high falls, 5 motorcycle crashes, and 1 bicyclist struck by a car. Twenty patients had associated injuries. Six fractures were open. All fractures were comminuted; according to the AO/OTA fracture classification there were 4 A2, 3 A3, 12 C2, and 3 C3 fractures. All fractures healed without secondary surgeries at a mean of 13 weeks (range 7-16 weeks). There were no cases of failed fixation, implant breakage, or infection. Average joint line orientation relative to the femoral shaft axis (valgus) measured 99 degrees on postoperative radiographs and 99 degrees on final radiographs. A comparison of postoperative to healed final radiographs for each femur demonstrated no case with greater than a 3 degrees difference in either varus or valgus. Complications included 1 mal-union where the fracture was fixed in 8 degrees of valgus and 2 cases of external rotation between 10 degrees and 15 degrees. Painful hardware occurred in 4 patients, of which 3 underwent implant removal. The average knee range of motion was 5 degrees to 114 degrees.
CONCLUSIONS: The Less Invasive Stabilization System allows for stable fixation and facilitates early healing in mechanically unstable high-energy fractures of the distal femur. There were no patients with fixation failure, varus collapse, or nonunion in this "at-risk" population. This treatment safely allows for immediate postoperative initiation of joint mobility and the progression of weight bearing with early radiographic signs of healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15475845     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200409000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  25 in total

1.  Effects of construct stiffness on healing of fractures stabilized with locking plates.

Authors:  Michael Bottlang; Josef Doornink; Trevor J Lujan; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; J Lawrence Marsh; Peter Augat; Brigitte von Rechenberg; Maren Lesser; Steven M Madey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Treatment for a femoral shaft bone defect using heterotopic bone formation as autograft.

Authors:  Jin Park; Jung Ryul Kim; Kyu Hyun Yang
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2011-09-09

3.  2010 mid-America Orthopaedic Association Physician in Training Award: healing complications are common after locked plating for distal femur fractures.

Authors:  Christopher E Henderson; Trevor J Lujan; Lori L Kuhl; Michael Bottlang; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; John L Marsh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Internal fixators: a safe option for managing distal femur fractures?

Authors:  Bruno Bellaguarda Batista; Rodrigo Salim; Cleber Antonio Jansen Paccola; Mauricio Kfuri Junior
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.513

5.  Interfragmentary lag screw and locking plate combination in simple distal femoral fractures: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Yan Wei; Guoding Li; Jian Wang; Youjia Xu
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.511

6.  Implant material and design alter construct stiffness in distal femur locking plate fixation: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ulf Schmidt; Rainer Penzkofer; Samuel Bachmaier; Peter Augat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Treatment Options for Distal Femoral Fractures.

Authors:  Olivera Lupescu; Mihail Nagea; Cristina Patru; Cornelia Vasilache; Gheorghe Ion Popescu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2015-06

8.  Lateral locked plating for distal femur fractures by low-energy trauma: what makes a difference in healing?

Authors:  Sang-Min Kim; Jae-Woo Yeom; Hyung Keun Song; Kyu-Tae Hwang; Ji-Hyo Hwang; Je-Hyun Yoo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Treatment of Distal Femur Nonunion Following Initial Fixation with a Lateral Locking Plate.

Authors:  Nabil A Ebraheim; Grant S Buchanan; Xiaochen Liu; Maxwell E Cooper; Nicholas Peters; Jacob A Hessey; Jiayong Liu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.071

10.  [Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of the distal femur].

Authors:  B C Link; J Rosenkranz; J Winkler; R Babst
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.