Literature DB >> 15475341

Environmental energy and evolutionary rates in flowering plants.

T Jonathan Davies1, Vincent Savolainen, Mark W Chase, Justin Moat, Timothy G Barraclough.   

Abstract

The latitudinal gradient in species richness is a pervasive feature of the living world, but its underlying causes remain unclear. We evaluated the hypothesis that environmental energy drives evolutionary rates and thereby diversification in flowering plants. We estimated energy levels across angiosperm family distributions in terms of evapotranspiration, temperature and UV radiation taken from satellite and climate databases. Using the most comprehensive DNA-based phylogenetic tree for angiosperms to date, analysis of 86 sister-family comparisons shows that molecular evolutionary rates have indeed been faster in high-energy regions, but that this is not an intermediate step between energy and diversity. Energy has strong, but independent effects on both species richness and molecular evolutionary rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15475341      PMCID: PMC1691837          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  20 in total

1.  Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-08-20       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Evolutionary rates and species diversity in flowering plants.

Authors:  T G Barraclough; V Savolainen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Nonstochastic variation of species-level diversification rates within angiosperms.

Authors:  Hallie J Sims; Kevin J McConway
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Molecular phylogenies link rates of evolution and speciation.

Authors:  Andrea J Webster; Robert J H Payne; Mark Pagel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Global biodiversity, biochemical kinetics, and the energetic-equivalence rule.

Authors:  Andrew P Allen; James H Brown; James F Gillooly
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Correcting parsimonious trees for unseen nucleotide substitutions: the effect of dense branching as exemplified by ribonuclease.

Authors:  W M Fitch; J J Beintema
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Model selection in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Jerald B Johnson; Kristian S Omland
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Marine latitudinal diversity gradients: tests of causal hypotheses.

Authors:  K Roy; D Jablonski; J W Valentine; G Rosenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Extreme differences in rates of molecular evolution of foraminifera revealed by comparison of ribosomal DNA sequences and the fossil record.

Authors:  J Pawlowski; I Bolivar; J F Fahrni; C de Vargas; M Gouy; L Zaninetti
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Darwin's abominable mystery: Insights from a supertree of the angiosperms.

Authors:  T Jonathan Davies; Timothy G Barraclough; Mark W Chase; Pamela S Soltis; Douglas E Soltis; Vincent Savolainen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  55 in total

1.  Evolutionary speed limited by water in arid Australia.

Authors:  Xavier Goldie; Len Gillman; Mike Crisp; Shane Wright
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Evolving entities: towards a unified framework for understanding diversity at the species and higher levels.

Authors:  Timothy G Barraclough
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Mutation rate is linked to diversification in birds.

Authors:  Robert Lanfear; Simon Y W Ho; Dominic Love; Lindell Bromham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Support for the evolutionary speed hypothesis from intraspecific population genetic data in the non-biting midge Chironomus riparius.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Oppold; João A M Pedrosa; Miklós Bálint; João B Diogo; Julia Ilkova; João L T Pestana; Markus Pfenninger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Repeated evolution of net venation and fleshy fruits among monocots in shaded habitats confirms a priori predictions: evidence from an ndhF phylogeny.

Authors:  Thomas J Givnish; J Chris Pires; Sean W Graham; Marc A McPherson; Linda M Prince; Thomas B Patterson; Hardeep S Rai; Eric H Roalson; Timothy M Evans; William J Hahn; Kendra C Millam; Alan W Meerow; Mia Molvray; Paul J Kores; Heath E O'Brien; Jocelyn C Hall; W John Kress; Kenneth J Sytsma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  There is no universal molecular clock for invertebrates, but rate variation does not scale with body size.

Authors:  Jessica A Thomas; John J Welch; Megan Woolfit; Lindell Bromham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Kinetic effects of temperature on rates of genetic divergence and speciation.

Authors:  Andrew P Allen; James F Gillooly; Van M Savage; James H Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Why do species vary in their rate of molecular evolution?

Authors:  Lindell Bromham
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  An examination of phylogenetic models of substitution rate variation among lineages.

Authors:  Simon Y W Ho
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Taller plants have lower rates of molecular evolution.

Authors:  Robert Lanfear; Simon Y W Ho; T Jonathan Davies; Angela T Moles; Lonnie Aarssen; Nathan G Swenson; Laura Warman; Amy E Zanne; Andrew P Allen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.