Literature DB >> 21059910

Mutation rate is linked to diversification in birds.

Robert Lanfear1, Simon Y W Ho, Dominic Love, Lindell Bromham.   

Abstract

How does genome evolution affect the rate of diversification of biological lineages? Recent studies have suggested that the overall rate of genome evolution is correlated with the rate of diversification. If true, this claim has important consequences for understanding the process of diversification, and implications for the use of DNA sequence data to reconstruct evolutionary history. However, the generality and cause of this relationship have not been established. Here, we test the relationship between the rate of molecular evolution and net diversification with a 19-gene, 17-kb DNA sequence dataset from 64 families of birds. We show that rates of molecular evolution are positively correlated to net diversification in birds. Using a 7.6-kb dataset of protein-coding DNA, we show that the synonymous substitution rate, and therefore the mutation rate, is correlated to net diversification. Further analysis shows that the link between mutation rates and net diversification is unlikely to be the indirect result of correlations with life-history variables that may influence both quantities, suggesting that there might be a causal link between mutation rates and net diversification.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21059910      PMCID: PMC2996675          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1007888107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  62 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Evolutionary rates and species diversity in flowering plants.

Authors:  T G Barraclough; V Savolainen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  The adjustment of avian metabolic rates and water fluxes to desert environments.

Authors:  B I Tieleman; J B Williams
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.247

4.  Are most species small? Not within species-level phylogenies.

Authors:  C David L Orme; Nick J B Isaac; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Watching the clock: studying variation in rates of molecular evolution between species.

Authors:  Robert Lanfear; John J Welch; Lindell Bromham
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Natural selection in avian protein-coding genes expressed in brain.

Authors:  Erik Axelsson; Lina Hultin-Rosenberg; Mikael Brandström; Martin Zwahlén; David F Clayton; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Model misspecification not the node-density artifact.

Authors:  Chris Venditti; Mark Pagel
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities.

Authors:  H A Orr; M Turelli
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Patterns of positive selection in six Mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Carolin Kosiol; Tomás Vinar; Rute R da Fonseca; Melissa J Hubisz; Carlos D Bustamante; Rasmus Nielsen; Adam Siepel
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Postglacial colonisation patterns and the role of isolation and expansion in driving diversification in a passerine bird.

Authors:  Bengt Hansson; Dennis Hasselquist; Maja Tarka; Pavel Zehtindjiev; Staffan Bensch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  49 in total

1.  The long and the short of avian W chromosomes: no evidence for gradual W shortening.

Authors:  Joanna Rutkowska; Malgorzata Lagisz; Shinichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Macroevolutionary speciation rates are decoupled from the evolution of intrinsic reproductive isolation in Drosophila and birds.

Authors:  Daniel L Rabosky; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Founder niche constrains evolutionary adaptive radiation.

Authors:  Régis C E Flohr; Carsten J Blom; Paul B Rainey; Hubertus J E Beaumont
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Clade size is not always an appropriate measure of diversification.

Authors:  Markus Englund
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sexual selection, body mass and molecular evolution interact to predict diversification in birds.

Authors:  Maider Iglesias-Carrasco; Michael D Jennions; Simon Y W Ho; David A Duchêne
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Molecular evolution and the latitudinal biodiversity gradient.

Authors:  E J Dowle; M Morgan-Richards; S A Trewick
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Flying rocks and flying clocks: disparity in fossil and molecular dates for birds.

Authors:  Daniel T Ksepka; Jessica L Ware; Kristin S Lamm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Low ecological disparity in Early Cretaceous birds.

Authors:  Jonathan S Mitchell; Peter J Makovicky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Integration of mtDNA pseudogenes into the nuclear genome coincides with speciation of the human genus. A hypothesis.

Authors:  Konstantin Gunbin; Leonid Peshkin; Konstantin Popadin; Sofia Annis; Rebecca R Ackermann; Konstantin Khrapko
Journal:  Mitochondrion       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.160

10.  Genomic Signature of an Avian Lilliput Effect across the K-Pg Extinction.

Authors:  Jacob S Berv; Daniel J Field
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 15.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.