Literature DB >> 15474578

Attentional effects on sensory tuning for single-feature detection and double-feature conjunction.

Peter Neri1.   

Abstract

When humans scan their visual environment, relevant objects are selectively attended for enhanced processing. It is still unclear in what ways processing is modified by attention, and whether attentional selection operates on an individual feature (such as colour, orientation or motion) or on binding together different features. In the experiments reported in this paper, these two stages were characterized using psychophysical reverse correlation. Subjects viewed eight patches, briefly flashed and symmetrically arranged around fixation. Each patch consisted of segments that could vary in both colour and orientation. One of the patches ('target') differed from the remaining 'distractor' patches with respect to either its orientation, colour, or both (in three different experiments). Subjects were asked to detect the target patch. The stimulus was preceded by a cue. On some trials ('cued' trials), the cue informed observers that the target patch could only appear at two of the eight possible locations. On remaining ('uncued') trials, all eight positions were valid. Psychophysical reverse correlation was then applied to derive linear estimates of sensory filters for orientation only, colour only, and their conjunction. In line with the properties of single neurons in cortex, attentional cueing did not affect sensory tuning for detecting individual features. However, it affected the way in which features were subsequently (and very inefficiently) combined in a multiplicative fashion. The results are consistent with a model in which attention recalibrates internal responses to the statistics of the stimulus by having signals from different features mutually control each other through reciprocal inhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15474578     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  6 in total

1.  Theoretical analysis of reverse-time correlation for idealized orientation tuning dynamics.

Authors:  Gregor Kovacic; Louis Tao; David Cai; Michael J Shelley
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 2.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  A review of the mechanisms by which attentional feedback shapes visual selectivity.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Janneke F M Jehee; Franco Pestilli
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  How inherently noisy is human sensory processing?

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

5.  Attentional control of sensory tuning in human visual perception.

Authors:  Aspasia E Paltoglou; Peter Neri
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Dynamic Reweighting of Auditory Modulation Filters.

Authors:  Eva R M Joosten; Shihab A Shamma; Christian Lorenzi; Peter Neri
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 4.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.