Literature DB >> 15474198

A multilevel analysis of race, community disadvantage, and body mass index among adults in the US.

Stephanie A Robert1, Eric N Reither.   

Abstract

This study examined the contributions of both individual socioeconomic status (SES) and community disadvantage in explaining the higher body mass index (BMI) of black adults in the US. Data from a national survey of adults (1986 American's Changing Lives Study) were combined with tract-level community data from the 1980 census. Results of multilevel regression analyses showed that black women had an age-adjusted BMI score three points higher than non-black women. Individual SES (income, education, assets) was negatively associated with BMI in women, but it only reduced the association between race and BMI from 2.99 to 2.50. Adding community socioeconomic disadvantage index further reduced the race coefficient slightly from 2.50 to 2.21. Nevertheless, living in communities with higher socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with higher BMI net of age, race, individual SES, smoking, physical activity, stress, and social support. Community income inequality (Gini) had an independent positive association with BMI, but did not substantially reduce racial differences among women. Community percent black was not associated with BMI. Results for men demonstrated no statistically significant racial differences in BMI, and no association between BMI and either individual SES or community disadvantage. Although individual SES and community socioeconomic disadvantage each partly explained the higher average BMI among black women, clear racial disparities persisted. Moreover, race, individual SES, community socioeconomic disadvantage, and individual health behaviors were each independent predictors of BMI among women. Unexplained within- and between-community variance in BMI remained among both women and men, with most unexplained variation due to within-community variance. Because our evidence for women suggests that the determinants of obesity are multiple and multilevel, attempts to address this growing social problem will similarly require a multi-faceted and multilevel approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15474198     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  127 in total

1.  Mixed land use and obesity: an empirical comparison of alternative land use measures and geographic scales.

Authors:  Ikuho Yamada; Barbara B Brown; Ken R Smith; Cathleen D Zick; Lori Kowaleski-Jones; Jessie X Fan
Journal:  Prof Geogr       Date:  2012-04-03

2.  Latino residential isolation and the risk of obesity in Utah: the role of neighborhood socioeconomic, built-environmental, and subcultural context.

Authors:  Ming Wen; Thomas N Maloney
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2011-12

3.  Area-based variations in obesity are more than a function of the food and physical activity environment : area-based variations in obesity.

Authors:  Masayoshi Oka; Carol L Link; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  The effects of childhood SNAP use and neighborhood conditions on adult body mass index.

Authors:  Thomas P Vartanian; Linda Houser
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2012-08

5.  Association of perceived neighborhood safety with [corrected] body mass index.

Authors:  Jason S Fish; Susan Ettner; Alfonso Ang; Arleen F Brown
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Family Adaptability and Cohesion and High Blood Pressure among Urban African American women.

Authors:  Kelly Brittain; Jacquelyn Y Taylor; Chun Yi Wu
Journal:  J Nurse Pract       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.767

7.  The built environment and risk of obesity in the United States: racial-ethnic disparities.

Authors:  Ming Wen; Lori Kowaleski-Jones
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 4.078

8.  Personal and neighborhood socioeconomic status and indices of neighborhood walk-ability predict body mass index in New York City.

Authors:  Andrew Rundle; Sam Field; Yoosun Park; Lance Freeman; Christopher C Weiss; Kathryn Neckerman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  The association among neighborhood socioeconomic status, race and chronic pain in black and white older adults.

Authors:  Molly Fuentes; Tamera Hart-Johnson; Carmen R Green
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.798

10.  One size fits all? Race, gender and body mass index among U.S. adults.

Authors:  Marino A Bruce; Mario Sims; Stephania Miller; Vanessa Elliott; Marian Ladipo
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.798

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.