Literature DB >> 15473699

Potential for false positive identifications from large databases through tandem mass spectrometry.

Benjamin J Cargile1, Jonathan L Bundy, James L Stephenson.   

Abstract

The biomedical research community at large is increasingly employing shotgun proteomics for large-scale identification of proteins from enzymatic digests. Typically, the approach used to identify proteins and peptides from tandem mass spectral data is based on the matching of experimentally generated tandem mass spectra to the theoretical best match from a protein database. Here, we present the potential difficulties of using such an approach without statistical consideration of the false positive rate, especially when large databases, as are encountered in eukaryotes are considered. This is illustrated by searching a dataset generated from a multidimensional separation of a eukaryotic tryptic digest against an in silico generated random protein database, which generated a significant number of positive matches, even when previously suggested score filtering criteria are used.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15473699     DOI: 10.1021/pr049946o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  47 in total

1.  Comprehensive proteomic analysis of membrane proteins in Toxoplasma gondii.

Authors:  Fa-Yun Che; Carlos Madrid-Aliste; Berta Burd; Hongshan Zhang; Edward Nieves; Kami Kim; Andras Fiser; Ruth Hogue Angeletti; Louis M Weiss
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-10-10       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  On the risk of false positive identification using multiple ion monitoring in qualitative mass spectrometry: large-scale intercomparisons with a comprehensive mass spectral library.

Authors:  Stephen E Stein; David N Heller
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Comprehensive analysis of proteins of pH fractionated samples using monolithic LC/MS/MS, intact MW measurement and MALDI-QIT-TOF MS.

Authors:  Chul Yoo; Tasneem H Patwa; Paweena Kreunin; Fred R Miller; Christian G Huber; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; David M Lubman
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.982

4.  Prediction of error associated with false-positive rate determination for peptide identification in large-scale proteomics experiments using a combined reverse and forward peptide sequence database strategy.

Authors:  Edward L Huttlin; Adrian D Hegeman; Amy C Harms; Michael R Sussman
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Minimizing back exchange in 18O/16O quantitative proteomics experiments by incorporation of immobilized trypsin into the initial digestion step.

Authors:  Joel R Sevinsky; Kristy J Brown; Benjamin J Cargile; Jonathan L Bundy; James L Stephenson
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  MyriMatch: highly accurate tandem mass spectral peptide identification by multivariate hypergeometric analysis.

Authors:  David L Tabb; Christopher G Fernando; Matthew C Chambers
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Verification of automated peptide identifications from proteomic tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  David L Tabb; David B Friedman; Amy-Joan L Ham
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

8.  Informatics strategies for large-scale novel cross-linking analysis.

Authors:  Gordon A Anderson; Nikola Tolic; Xiaoting Tang; Chunxiang Zheng; James E Bruce
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 9.  Immobilized pH gradient isoelectric focusing as a first-dimension separation in shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Benjamin J Cargile; Joel R Sevinsky; Amal S Essader; James L Stephenson; Jonathan L Bundy
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2005-09

10.  An insight into high-resolution mass-spectrometry data.

Authors:  J E Eckel-Passow; A L Oberg; T M Therneau; H R Bergen
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 5.899

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.