Literature DB >> 15472494

A comparison of the efficacy and duration of action of telmisartan, amlodipine and ramipril in patients with confirmed ambulatory hypertension.

Luc Poirier1, Jacques de Champlain, Pierre Larochelle, Maxime Lamarre-Cliche, Yves Lacourcière.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare the antihypertensive effects and the duration of action of telmisartan, amlodipine and ramipril in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring.
METHODS: After a 2-4-week single-blind, placebo run-in period, qualifying patients were randomized to receive telmisartan 80 mg (n=18); amlodipine 5 mg (n=22); titrated to 10 mg after 4 weeks; or ramipril 2.5 mg (n=17); titrated to 5 mg and 10 mg after 1 and 3 weeks, respectively, administered once daily in the morning (0700 h). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed at baseline and at the end of the 8-week treatment period. Plasma renin activity was measured over 24 h at the same time points.
RESULTS: Telmisartan and amlodipine provided significant reductions from baseline (P<0.0001) and not statistically different reductions between treatments in ABP during daytime (9.3/6.0 and 14.7/9.4 mmHg, respectively) and night-time (12.4/7.7 and 13.3/8.6 mmHg, respectively) at the end of 8 weeks' treatment. In contrast, although ramipril provided significant reductions in ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP from 2-6 h post dose (peak effect), it failed to induce significant reductions in mean daytime (4.5/1.6 mmHg) and night-time (1.8/0.1 mmHg) ambulatory BP. In addition, the greater reductions in ABP with telmisartan and amlodipine were associated with a significant rise in plasma renin activity whereas ramipril only increased renin during the first 4 h of the administration interval.
CONCLUSION: The results of the present study confirm the efficacy of both telmisartan and amlodipine in reducing ABP during each period of the 24-h interval. Because ABP reduction with ramipril was restricted to its peak effect, the present data do not support the use of this agent when administered once daily in the morning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15472494     DOI: 10.1097/00126097-200410000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  5 in total

Review 1.  Antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers as monotherapy as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Harikrishna Makani; Sripal Bangalore; Azhar Supariwala; Jorge Romero; Edgar Argulian; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  Direct renin inhibitors: a new approach to antihypertensive drug treatment.

Authors:  C Venkata S Ram
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  A pilot study on the effect of telmisartan & ramipril on 24 h blood pressure profile & dipping pattern in type 1 diabetes patients with nephropathy.

Authors:  R Anantharaman; Anil Bhansali; Sanjay K Bhadada; Harbir S Kohli; Rama Walia; G Shanmugasundar; P Jayaprakash
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Comparison of blood pressure control with amlodipine and controlled-release isradipine: an open-label, drug substitution study.

Authors:  Michael Ganz; Rasoul Mokabberi; Domenic A Sica
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide versus valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide in obese hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: the SMOOTH study.

Authors:  Arya M Sharma; Jaime Davidson; Stephen Koval; Yves Lacourcière
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 9.951

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.