Literature DB >> 15471588

Simple models of stimulation of neurones in the brain by electric fields.

J F Iles1.   

Abstract

The excitation of pyramidal cells in the motor cortex, produced by electric fields generated by distant electrodes or by electromagnetic induction, has been modelled. Linear, steady-state models of myelinated axons capture most of the geometrical aspects of neurone activation in electric fields. Some non-linear features can be approximated. Models with a proximal sealed-end and distal infinite axon, or of finite length, are both serviceable. Surface anodal stimulation produces hyperpolarisation of the proximal axon (closest to the anode) and depolarisation in the distal axon. The point of maximum depolarisation can be influenced by the location of the cathode (greater separation of anode and cathode causes more distal depolarisation). Axon bends can produce very localised depolarisation. Cathodal stimulation may be less effective than anodal as a result of anodal block of conduction of action potentials in the distal axon. The latencies of responses to anodal stimulation, recorded in the distal axon, will decrease as the stimulus strength is increased and the point of action potential initiation moves distally node by node. Larger jumps in latency will be produced when the point of action potential initiation moves from one axon bend to another.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15471588     DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol        ISSN: 0079-6107            Impact factor:   3.667


  7 in total

1.  Spinal direct current stimulation modulates the activity of gracile nucleus and primary somatosensory cortex in anaesthetized rats.

Authors:  J Aguilar; F Pulecchi; R Dilena; A Oliviero; A Priori; G Foffani
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Polarity of cortical electrical stimulation differentially affects neuronal activity of deep and superficial layers of rat motor cortex.

Authors:  Azadeh Yazdan-Shahmorad; Daryl R Kipke; Mark J Lehmkuhle
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 3.  Electroconvulsive therapy stimulus parameters: rethinking dosage.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Moacyr A Rosa; Zhi-De Deng; Joan Prudic; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.635

4.  Which elements of the mammalian central nervous system are excited by low current stimulation with microelectrodes?

Authors:  F Rattay; C Wenger
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Selective extracellular stimulation of individual neurons in ganglia.

Authors:  Hui Lu; Cynthia A Chestek; Kendrick M Shaw; Hillel J Chiel
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Strength-duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes.

Authors:  F Rattay; L P Paredes; R N Leao
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Chronaxie Measurements in Patterned Neuronal Cultures from Rat Hippocampus.

Authors:  Shani Stern; Andres Agudelo-Toro; Assaf Rotem; Elisha Moses; Andreas Neef
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.