Literature DB >> 15471005

Potential risk factors for bovine Neospora caninum infection in Germany are not under the control of the farmers.

G Schares1, A Bärwald, C Staubach, M Ziller, D Klöss, R Schröder, R Labohm, K Dräger, W Fasen, R G Hess, F J Conraths.   

Abstract

In the German state of Rhineland-Palatinate, herds were identified that were likely to have a Neospora caninum sero-prevalence > or = 10% by using a bulk milk ELISA. Individual herd data were obtained by a questionnaire. Univariate logistic regression showed that bulk milk positive farms had a significantly higher chance to report an increased abortion rate than negative farms (P(Wald)<0.1). The chance to have a bulk milk positive herd increased with the minimum number of years a farm had reported an increased abortion rate (P(Wald)<0.1). Questionnaire data, population and dog density as well as climatic data specific for the farm localization were used to identify potential risk factors for a herd to have acquired N. caninum infections. Within an optimized multiple logistic regression model 'Number of farm dogs', 'Herd size', and factors related to the municipality the farm was localized, i.e. 'Mean temperature in July', and 'Dog density' were significant risk factors (P(Wald)<0.1). The present study underlines the role farm dogs have in the epidemiology of neosporosis. In addition, it suggests that the risk a herd has to acquire N. caninum infections is also associated with factors related to the farm location, i.e. factors that are largely out of the control of farmers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15471005     DOI: 10.1017/s0031182004005700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitology        ISSN: 0031-1820            Impact factor:   3.234


  8 in total

1.  Effect of Urbanization on Neospora caninum Seroprevalence in White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus).

Authors:  Gregory A Ballash; Mark C Jenkins; O C H Kwok; J P Dubey; Abigail B Shoben; Terry L Robison; Tom Kraft; Erik E Shaffer; Patricia M Dennis
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.184

Review 2.  Epidemiology and control of neosporosis and Neospora caninum.

Authors:  J P Dubey; G Schares; L M Ortega-Mora
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunoblot (IB) for the detection of antibodies against Neospora caninum in milk from dairy cows.

Authors:  I P Chatziprodromidou; T Apostolou
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.434

4.  Bulk milk ELISA and the diagnosis of parasite infections in dairy herds: a review.

Authors:  Mary Sekiya; Annetta Zintl; Michael L Doherty
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.146

5.  Prevalence of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody to Neospora caninum in dairy cattle of Hamedan province, west of Iran.

Authors:  Jamal Gharekhani; Hamidreza Haddadzadeh; Alireza Bahonar
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.054

6.  Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in Cattle in Portugal.

Authors:  Helga Waap; Andrea Bärwald; Telmo Nunes; Gereon Schares
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.231

7.  Neospora spp. Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Seropositivity in Apparently Healthy Horses and Pregnant Mares.

Authors:  Lea Mimoun; Amir Steinman; Ynon Kliachko; Sharon Tirosh-Levy; Gili Schvartz; Elena Blinder; Gad Baneth; Monica Leszkowicz Mazuz
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.231

8.  Neospora caninum infection in dairy farms with history of abortion in West of Iran.

Authors:  Jamal Gharekhani; Mohammad Yakhchali
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2019-09-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.