Literature DB >> 15469443

Students' attitudes to digital radiography and measurement accuracy of two digital systems in connection with root canal treatment.

A Wenzel1, L-L Kirkevang.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate students' attitudes towards digital radiography and measurement accuracy in digital images recorded with a CCD-sensor and a photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plate radiography system in connection with root canal treatment. Thirty-one dental students participated in an endodontic course. Two single-rooted teeth were assigned at random to two receptors for digital radiographic examination, either (i) the RVG-ui CCD sensor or (ii) the Digora PSP plate system. After the endodontic treatment had been completed for the first tooth, the student filled in a questionnaire on their use of the digital system. Thereafter, the students switched radiography system and repeated the procedure for the second tooth. Eventually, the students completed the questionnaire by answering questions that directly compared the two digital systems. The gutta-percha filled tooth was measured using the system's own software. Two measurements of each tooth were performed: total tooth length (TTL) and root filling length (RFL). The teeth were dismounted from the plaster blocks and the true TTL and RFL was measured with an electronic slide calliper. The majority of the students had used the contrast enhancement facility (CCD sensor = 52%, PSP = 71%) and the zoom facility (65-68%) whilst some had used the density enhancement facility (CCD sensor = 39%, PSP = 55%). The students stated that they saved more time when they used the CCD sensor than when they used the PSP system (P < 0.001), and that it was easier to position the tooth with the PSP plate than with the sensor (P < 0.01). The lengths measured on the digital images from both digital systems were marginally larger than the true tooth lengths (P < 0.05). However, there was no difference between the two digital systems for the TTL/RFL ratio (P > 0.05). Copyright 2004 Blackwell Munksgaard

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15469443     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2004.00347.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Dent Educ        ISSN: 1396-5883            Impact factor:   2.355


  7 in total

1.  Dental students' knowledge and attitudes towards cone beam computed tomography in Turkey.

Authors:  K Kamburoglu; S Kursun; Z Z Akarslan
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Imaging evaluating of the implant/bone interface-an in vitro radiographic study.

Authors:  Michele M Vidor; Gabriela S Liedke; Mariana B Vizzotto; Heraldo L D da Silveira; Priscila F da Silveira; Cristiano W Araujo; Heloisa E D da Silveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  The predictive power of saliva electrolytes exceeds that of saliva microbiomes in diagnosing early childhood caries.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Shi Huang; Songbo Jia; Zheng Sun; Shanshan Li; Fan Li; Lijuan Zhang; Jie Lu; Kaixuan Tan; Fei Teng; Fang Yang
Journal:  J Oral Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.474

Review 4.  Detection and diagnosis of the early caries lesion.

Authors:  J Gomez
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Repeat analysis of intraoral digital imaging performed by undergraduate students using a complementary metal oxide semiconductor sensor: An institutional case study.

Authors:  Mohd Yusmiaidil Putera Mohd Yusof; Nur Liyana Abdul Rahman; Amiza Aqiela Ahmad Asri; Noor Ilyani Othman; Ilham Wan Mokhtar
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2017-12-12

6.  Assessment formats in dental medicine: An overview.

Authors:  Susanne Gerhard-Szep; Arndt Güntsch; Peter Pospiech; Andreas Söhnel; Petra Scheutzel; Torsten Wassmann; Tugba Zahn
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-15

Review 7.  Digital Undergraduate Education in Dentistry: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nicola U Zitzmann; Lea Matthisson; Harald Ohla; Tim Joda
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.