Literature DB >> 15467565

Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial.

Mary E Hannah1, Hilary Whyte, Walter J Hannah, Sheila Hewson, Kofi Amankwah, Mary Cheng, Amiram Gafni, Patricia Guselle, Michael Helewa, Ellen D Hodnett, Eileen Hutton, Rose Kung, Darren McKay, Susan Ross, Saroj Saigal, Andrew Willan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare maternal outcomes at 2 years postpartum after planned cesarean section and planned vaginal birth for the singleton fetus in breech presentation at term. STUDY
DESIGN: In selected centers in the Term Breech Trial, mothers completed a structured questionnaire at 2 or more years postpartum to determine their health in the previous 3 to 6 months.
RESULTS: A total of 917 of 1159 (79.1%) mothers from 85 centers completed a follow-up questionnaire at 2 years postpartum. There were no differences between groups in breast feeding, relationship with child or partner, pain, subsequent pregnancy, incontinence, depression, urinary, menstrual or sexual problems, fatigue, or distressing memories of the birth experience. Planned cesarean section was associated with a higher risk of constipation (P = .02).
CONCLUSION: Maternal outcomes at 2 years postpartum are similar after planned cesarean section and planned vaginal birth for the singleton breech fetus at term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15467565     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  53 in total

1.  Prevention of Labour-Associated Pelvic Floor Injuries - What is Known for Sure.

Authors:  H B G Franz; C Erxleben; A Franz; R Hofmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  The effect of mode of delivery on postpartum sexual functioning in primiparous women.

Authors:  Basak Baksu; Inci Davas; Eser Agar; Atif Akyol; Ahmet Varolan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-07-27

3.  Not safer and not cheaper?

Authors:  Michael Klein
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Is planned cesarean childbirth a safe alternative?

Authors:  B Anthony Armson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal delivery: comparison of lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  Asa Ekström; Daniel Altman; Ingela Wiklund; Christina Larsson; Ellika Andolf
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-09-26

6.  Population trends in cesarean delivery for breech presentation in the United States, 1997-2003.

Authors:  Henry Chong Lee; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Jeffrey B Gould
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Pregnancy, childbirth, and sexual function: perceptions and facts.

Authors:  A O Yeniel; E Petri
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Samuel Parry; Aaron B Caughey; Sarah Rosen; Allison Keen; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 9.  Neonatal morbidity and mortality after elective cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Caroline Signore; Mark Klebanoff
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.430

10.  The association between increased use of labor induction and reduced rate of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Peter Cronholm; Lisa C Kellar; Morghan H Stenson; George A Macones
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.