Literature DB >> 17896063

Planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal delivery: comparison of lower urinary tract symptoms.

Asa Ekström1, Daniel Altman, Ingela Wiklund, Christina Larsson, Ellika Andolf.   

Abstract

We compared the prevalence and risk of lower urinary tract symptoms in healthy primiparous women in relation to vaginal birth or elective cesarean section 9 months after delivery. We performed a prospective controlled cohort study including 220 women delivered by elective cesarean section and 215 by vaginal birth. All subjects received an identical questionnaire on lower urinary tract symptoms in late pregnancy, at 3 and 9 months postpartum. Two hundred twenty subjects underwent elective cesarean section, and 215 subjects underwent vaginal delivery. After childbirth, the 3-month questionnaire was completed by 389/435 subjects (89%) and the 9-month questionnaire by 376/435 subjects (86%). In the vaginal delivery cohort, all lower urinary tract symptoms increased significantly at 9 months follow-up. When compared to cesarean section, the prevalence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after vaginal delivery was significantly increased both at 3 (p < 0.001) and 9 months (p = 0.001) follow-up. In a multivariable risk model, vaginal delivery was the only obstetrical predictor for SUI [relative risk (RR) 8.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-42] and for urinary urgency (RR 7.3 95% CI 1.7-32) at 9 months follow-up. A history of SUI before pregnancy (OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.5-19) and at 3 months follow-up (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.7-8.5) were independent predictors for SUI at 9 months follow-up. Vaginal delivery is associated with an increased risk for lower urinary tract symptoms 9 months after childbirth when compared to elective cesarean section.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17896063     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-007-0461-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  29 in total

Review 1.  The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip Van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  [Management of labor and delivery in low risk nulliparous women: comparison between level 1 and level 3 maternities].

Authors:  C Le Ray; S Gaudu; M Teboul; D Cabrol; F Goffinet
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  2004-02

3.  Parturition and urinary incontinence in primiparas.

Authors:  S A Farrell; V M Allen; T F Baskett
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  The effect of pregnancy and mode of delivery on the prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Vikki McKinnie; Steven E Swift; Wei Wang; Patrick Woodman; Amy O'Boyle; Margie Kahn; Michael Valley; Deirdre Bland; Joe Schaffer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery.

Authors:  A H MacLennan; A W Taylor; D H Wilson; D Wilson
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Obstetric risk factors for stress urinary incontinence: a population-based study.

Authors:  J Persson; P Wolner-Hanssen; H Rydhstroem
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Pudendal nerve damage during labour: prospective study before and after childbirth.

Authors:  A H Sultan; M A Kamm; C N Hudson
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1994-01

8.  Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery: a five-year prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Johan Pollack; Johan Nordenstam; Sophia Brismar; Annika Lopez; Daniel Altman; Jan Zetterstrom
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction with emphasis on urinary and fecal incontinence and genital prolapse: an epidemiological study.

Authors:  Eva Uustal Fornell; Gun Wingren; Preben Kjølhede
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  Effects of carrying a pregnancy and of method of delivery on urinary incontinence: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Erica Eason; Michel Labrecque; Sylvie Marcoux; Myrto Mondor
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of urinary incontinence in pregnancy and postpartum in Curitiba Mothers Program: a prospective study.

Authors:  Caroline Tarazi Valeton; Vivian Ferreira do Amaral
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  An insight into pelvic floor status in nulliparous women.

Authors:  C M Durnea; A S Khashan; L C Kenny; S S Tabirca; B A O'Reilly
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence in Chinese women during and after their first pregnancy.

Authors:  Symphorosa S C Chan; Rachel Y K Cheung; K W Yiu; L L Lee; Tony K H Chung
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  The Influence of Back Pain and Urinary Incontinence on Daily Tasks of Mothers at 12 Months Postpartum.

Authors:  Cynthia A Mannion; Angela E Vinturache; Sheila W McDonald; Suzanne C Tough
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of pelvic floor dysfunction 6 years after uncomplicated vaginal versus elective cesarean deliveries: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  David Baud; Joanna Sichitiu; Valeria Lombardi; Maud De Rham; Sylvain Meyer; Yvan Vial; Chahin Achtari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Smartphone-based reminder system to promote pelvic floor muscle training for the management of postnatal urinary incontinence: historical control study with propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Kaori Kinouchi; Kazutomo Ohashi
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.