Manganese superoxide dismutase (Mn-SOD), localized at the mitochondrial matrix, has the ability to protect cells against oxidative damage. It has been reported that low levels of Mn-SOD gene expression cause the development of certain kind of tumors. On the other hand, overexpression of Mn-SOD gene may play an important role in the development of cancer. In our study, we find that Mn-SOD activity was higher in nonaggressive (MCF-7) and aggressive (BT-549 and 11-9-14) breast cancer cell lines compared to that of nontumorigenic (MCF-12A and MCF-12F) mammary epithelial cell lines. We also observed an increased expression of Mn-SOD gene in cancerous cell lines. The elevated level of SOD activity in nonaggressive and aggressive breast epithelial cell lines was associated with some changes in nucleotide sequence.
Manganese superoxide dismutase (Mn-SOD), localized at the mitochondrial matrix, has the ability to protect cells against oxidative damage. It has been reported that low levels of Mn-SOD gene expression cause the development of certain kind of tumors. On the other hand, overexpression of Mn-SOD gene may play an important role in the development of cancer. In our study, we find that Mn-SOD activity was higher in nonaggressive (MCF-7) and aggressive (BT-549 and 11-9-14) breast cancer cell lines compared to that of nontumorigenic (MCF-12A and MCF-12F) mammary epithelial cell lines. We also observed an increased expression of Mn-SOD gene in cancerous cell lines. The elevated level of SOD activity in nonaggressive and aggressive breast epithelial cell lines was associated with some changes in nucleotide sequence.
Carcinoma of the breast, the third most common cancer worldwide,
accounts for the highest morbidity and mortality [1].
It is also the second leading cause of cancer death in women, after lung cancer
[2]. The etiology of breast cancer is multifactorial.
Hormonal, genetic, and environmental factors are implicated in
the pathogenesis of breast cancer [3]. Furthermore, reactive
oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide anions and hydrogen
peroxide-induced lipid peroxidation, play a major role in
malignant transformation [4] and tumor cell proliferation
and invasion [5, 6,
7]. It has been hypothesized that the
production of ROS in combination with a decrease in the activity
of antioxidant enzymes may be characteristic of tumor cells
[8, 9].Superoxide dismutase (SOD) is a family of ubiquitous antioxidant
metalloproteinases that catalyze the conversion of superoxide
anion radicals to hydrogen peroxide and molecular oxygen
[10]. Three different isoforms of SOD (cytosolic
Cu/Zn SOD or SOD1, mitochondrial Mn-SOD or SOD2, and
extracellular SOD or SOD3) exist within this family. Among these
three, manganese superoxide dismutase (Mn-SOD) which is localized
at the mitochondrial matrix [11,
12, 13] has shown the
ability to reverse malignant phenotype in a variety of humantumor cells that are low or absent in Mn-SOD expression. It has
been hypothesized that the Mn-SOD gene is a tumor suppressor
[14, 15].
Mn-SOD activity has been reported to be decreased
in many transformed cell lines suggesting that an altered Mn-SOD
gene may play an important role in the development of cancer
[16, 17,
18, 19].
The purpose of the present study was to
investigate whether a differential expression of Mn-SOD exists
between nontumorigenic human mammary epithelial cell lines
(MCF-12A and MCF-12F), nonaggressive human breast
cancer cell lines (MCF-7) and aggressive canceroushuman mammary epithelial cell lines (BT-549 and 11-9-14).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Maintenance of human mammary epithelial cell lines
Five cell lines representing nontumorigenic (MCF-12A and MCF-12F),
nonaggressive cancerous (MCF-7), and aggressive cancerous
(11-9-14 and BT-549) human mammary epithelial cells were used in
this study. All cell lines except 11-9-14 were obtained from
ATCC, Va. 11-9-14 cell line was obtained from the Tissue
Procurement Facility, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, Tenn. It
was originated from the human breast epithelial cell line BT-549
at ATCC and transfected with galectin-3, a β-galactoside
binding protein (a cell adhesion molecule). The cells were
cultured in DMEM/F-12, supplemented with 100 μg/mL
penicillin-streptomycin, 2.5 μg/mL fungizone,
20 ng/mL epidermal growth factor, 98 ng/mL cholera toxin,
10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, and
nonessential amino acids. The cultures were maintained at
37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and
95% air. All cell culture supplies were purchased from Sigma, Mo.
Assay of SOD activity
SOD activity was measured using alkaline dimethyl
sulfoxide as superoxide anion generating system as follows. Samples to be assayed
(200 μL) were added to 1 mL of 0.20 M potassium
phosphate buffer (pH 8.6) containing 10−4 M EDTA and
2 × 10−5 M cytochrome C. Tubes were kept in an ice
bath for 20 minutes. Then, 0.5 mL alkaline DMSO (DMSO
containing 1% water and 5 mM NaOH) was added with
stirring. After the addition of alkaline DMSO, the final pH of
the solution was usually between 9.5 and 9.6. Absorbance of
reduced cytochrome C was determined at 550 nm against samples
prepared under similar conditions except that DMSO did not
contain NaOH. Mn-SOD activity was determined after
incubating the cell lysates with 50 mM NaCN because
NaCN inhibits the activity of cytosolic
Cu-Zn SOD. The final concentration of NaCN
in the assay mixture was 5 mM. A unit of enzymatic activity
is the amount of enzyme, which causes 50% inhibition of alkalineDMSO-mediated cytochrome c reduction [20].Reverse
transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. The gel picture showing
differential RT-PCR product. Lane 1 : 5 μg RNA from MCF-12A
in RT-PCR; lane 2 : 5 μg RNA from MCF-12F in RT-PCR; lane
3 : 5 μg RNA from MCF-7 in RT-PCR; lane 4 : 5 μg RNA
from BT-549 in RT-PCR; lane 5 : 5 μg RNA from 11-9-14 in
RT-PCR; lane 6 : 1 kb plus marker.Slot blot hybridization. Increasing amounts of RNA (0,
1, 2, and 4 μg) were taken from MCF-12A, MCF-12F, MCF-7,
BT-549, and 11-9-14 breast epithelial cells and hybridized with probe.Alignment of nucleotide sequence of MCF-12AMn-SOD gene
with that of human GenBank (M36693) sequence.Alignment of peptide sequence of MCF-12AMn-SOD gene
with that of human GenBank (M36693) sequence.Activity of SOD in different cell lines (values are mean
± SEM, ). *Values in cancer
cell lines (MCF-7, BT-549, 11-9-14) are significantly different
from those in normal cell lines (MCF-12A and MCF-12F), .Band intensities (IDV values) of slot blot for normal
and cancer cell lines at different RNA concentrations. (Values
are mean ± SEM, ). Values in cancer cell lines (MCF-7,
BT-549, and 11-9-14) are significantly different from those in
normal cell lines (MCF-12A and MCF-12F), .Comparison of nucleotide sequence of RT-PCR products of
Mn-SOD gene between different human breast cell lines.Comparison of amino acid (AA) sequence of Mn-SOD gene
between different human breast cell lines.
Isolation of RNA
RNA was isolated from 106 cells using Trizol (Invitrogen, Md).
Cells were first washed with sterile PBS three times and
resuspended in 1 mL Trizol and sonicated in a Branson
sonifier cell disrupter. The mixture was kept in room temperature
for 5 minutes. Then 200 μL chloroform was added and
the mixture was vigorously shaken. The phases were separated by
centrifuging at 12 000 rpm for 15 minutes at
4°C. The RNA was then precipitated from the aqueous phase
with isopropanol (25°C). The pellet was washed with ample
amounts of sterile, 70% ethanol (25°C). The concentration
and the purity of the RNA were analyzed in a UV spectrophotometer.
Slot blot hybridization
Slot blot hybridization was performed using increasing amounts of
RNA from all samples. The reverse primer,
5′GTATCTTTCAGTTACATTCTCCCA-3′, for SOD and forward primer,
5′GTGGAGTCTACTGGCGTCTTC-3′, for GAPDH were digoxigenin-labeled
for slot blot hybridization using the Terminal DIG labeling kit
(Roche Biochemicals, Ind). Different amounts of RNA (0,
1, 2, and 4 μg) from all cells were loaded onto a
positively charged nylon membrane (MSI, Ga) using a Turboblotter
(BioRad, Calif). The samples were then linked to the membrane
using a UV crosslinker (Stratagene, Calif). A nonradioactive
detection method using digoxigenin (Roche Biochemicals, Ind) was
used to detect any hybridization. The membranes were washed under
high-stringent conditions with 0.1 × SSC and 0.1% SDS at
600°C for 1 hour before being exposed to the film. The
labeled reverse primer was used as the probe and the
hybridization was performed following manufacturer's
instructions. The band intensities (IDV values) were quantitated
using the alpha imager (Alpha Innotech, Calif).
Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction
RT-PCR of both SOD and GAPDH was performed using 5 μg RNA
from each sample, using the One-Step RT-PCR kit (Invitrogen, Md).
The primers were synthesized to amplify approximately 200 amino
acids in the carboxyl end of the protein and based on the
sequences from the GenBank Accession No. M36693. The primer
sequences were 5′-TTGAGCCGGGCAGTGTGCGGCACC-3′ (forward) and
5′-GTATCTTTCAGTTACATTCTCCCA-3′ (reverse) for SOD, and
5′GTGGAGTCTACTGGCGTCTTC-3′ (forward) and
5′ CATGCCAGTGAGCTTCCCGTT-3′ (reverse) for GAPDH.
RT-PCR was performed in a thermal cycler (Biometra, Tgradient) as
follows: 1 cycle for 30 minutes at 45°C, 1 cycle for
2 minutes at 94°C, 39 cycles for 1 minute at
94°C, 1 minute at 50°C, 2 minutes at
72°C and 1 cycle for 10 minutes at 72°C. The
RT-PCR products were electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel,
purified using QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Calif), and
sequenced using BigDye terminators kit (Applied Biosystems, Calif). The
sequences were analyzed using Applied Biosystems
automated sequencer (ABI 3700 model).
Statistical analysis
Differences between tumorigenic and nontumorigenic cells were assessed by using
ANOVA, and the significance level was set at .
RESULTS
Activity of SOD
Total as well as Mn-SOD activity was varied between cell lines
(Table 1). The order of activity was MCF-7
(nonaggressive) > BT-549 and 11-9-14 (aggressive) > MCF-12A
and MCF-12F (nontumorigenic).
Table 1
Activity of SOD in different cell lines (values are mean
± SEM, ). *Values in cancer
cell lines (MCF-7, BT-549, 11-9-14) are significantly different
from those in normal cell lines (MCF-12A and MCF-12F), .
Cell line
Total SOD activity (unit/mg protein)
Mn-SOD activity (unit/mg protein)
MCF-12A
17.77 ± 1.563
3.04 ± 0.35
MCF-12F
21.72 ± 1.508
2.42 ± 0.12
MCF-7
42.76 ± 5.717*
16.38 ± 1.13*
BT-549
28.47 ± 1.215*
7.83 ± 0.47*
11-9-14
29.49 ± 0.858*
10.69 ± 0.29*
Expression of Mn-SOD gene
An RT-PCR yielded products of approximately 0.6 kb for SOD
and 0.4 kb for GAPDH in all cell lines. The results showed
the differential expression of Mn-SOD gene between
nontumorigenic, nonaggressive, and aggressive breast cancer cell
lines (BT-549 and 11-9-14) (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Reverse
transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. The gel picture showing
differential RT-PCR product. Lane 1 : 5 μg RNA from MCF-12A
in RT-PCR; lane 2 : 5 μg RNA from MCF-12F in RT-PCR; lane
3 : 5 μg RNA from MCF-7 in RT-PCR; lane 4 : 5 μg RNA
from BT-549 in RT-PCR; lane 5 : 5 μg RNA from 11-9-14 in
RT-PCR; lane 6 : 1 kb plus marker.
A slot blot hybridization (Figure 2) was done with
increasing amounts of RNA from nontumorigenic (MCF-12A and
MCF-12F), nonaggressive cancerous (MCF-7), and aggressive
cancerous (BT-549 and 11-9-14) cell lines to confirm their
differential expression of Mn-SOD RNA. The housekeeping gene,
GAPDH, was used as a positive control. No change in the
expression of GAPDH was observed with increasing
concentration of RNA. The quantitative analysis of the RNA levels
shown in Figure 2 has been normalized with the RNA
level of GAPDH gene (Table 2) which indicates
that the band intensities are different between these cell lines.
Highest expression was observed in MCF-7 in comparison with
others. Expression was lowest in MCF-12A.
Figure 2
Slot blot hybridization. Increasing amounts of RNA (0,
1, 2, and 4 μg) were taken from MCF-12A, MCF-12F, MCF-7,
BT-549, and 11-9-14 breast epithelial cells and hybridized with probe.
Table 2
Band intensities (IDV values) of slot blot for normal
and cancer cell lines at different RNA concentrations. (Values
are mean ± SEM, ). Values in cancer cell lines (MCF-7,
BT-549, and 11-9-14) are significantly different from those in
normal cell lines (MCF-12A and MCF-12F), .
RNA conc. (μg)
IDV values
MCF-12A
MCF-12F
MCF-7
BT-549
11-9-14
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0.95 ± 0.003
1.53 ± 0.03
4.49 ± 0.002
1.97 ± 0.002
1.91 ± 0.001
2
1.37 ± 0.05
2.11 ± 0.04
4.71 ± 0.1
2.84 ± 0.06
3.25 ± 0.04
4
1.76 ± 0.08
2.44 ± 0.14
5.37 ± 0.49
3.24 ± 0.11
3.04 ± 0.61
Sequencing of RT-PCR products of Mn-SOD gene
The RT-PCR products from MCF-12A, MCF-12F, MCF-7, BT-549, and
11-9-14 were sequenced and each nucleotide sequence was compared
with that of the humanMn-SOD gene as reported in NCBI data base
(M36693). We have shown here the alignment of the nucleotide
sequence of one representative human breast cell line (MCF-12A)
with that of the humanMn-SOD from GenBank (Accession No. M36693)
(Figure 3).
Figure 3
Alignment of nucleotide sequence of MCF-12A Mn-SOD gene
with that of human GenBank (M36693) sequence.
With our primers, we could sequence 627 to 652 nucleotides
depending on the cell lines (Table 3). This sequence
exactly aligns to a segment (98–746) of the humanMn-SOD cDNA
(976 bp, GenBank Accession No. M36693). In MCF-12A and
MCF-12F, we found three base changes in the nucleotide level
(Table 4). One of these was common
in both (339).
The two other changes were different between MCF-12A
(130
and 139) and MCF-12F
(141
and 625).
When the sequences of MCF-7, BT-549, and 11-9-14 were
compared with that of M36693, we found only one substitution in
each of these cell lines (Table 3). In both MCF-7 and
11-9-14 cell lines, this change was from c to
t (339)
as observed in both MCF-12A and MCF-12F. However, in BT-549, it was from
c to t at 141
(141).
Table 3
Comparison of nucleotide sequence of RT-PCR products of
Mn-SOD gene between different human breast cell lines.
Cell line
Number of bases sequenced
Aligned with M36693 (Mn-SOD)
Change against M36693
MCF-12A
652
98–736
g130c,
c139t,
c339t
MCF-12F
637
136–732
c141t,
c339t,
t625c
MCF-7
631
106–736
c339t
11-9-14
640
107–746
c339t
BT-549
627
107–733
c141t
Table 4
Comparison of amino acid (AA) sequence of Mn-SOD gene
between different human breast cell lines.
Cell line
Number of AA Sequenced
Aligned with M36693 (Mn-SOD)
Mutation against M36693
MCF-12A
217
2–214
Q12H,
A16V,
T82I
MCF-12F
212
15–213
A16V,
T82I
MCF-7
210
5–214
T82I
BT-549
209
5–213
A16V
11-9-14
213
5–217
T82I
The nucleotide sequence was translated using human codon usage to
give a peptide sequence of 209–217 amino acids
(Table 4). This sequence exactly corresponds to a
segment (2–217) of the Mn-SOD peptide sequence of M36693
(GenBank). For MCF-12A, three amino acid changes were found
(12,
16,
82). Two changes were observed for
MCF-12F cell line (16,
82). But in other cell
lines, only one amino acid substitution (82
in MCF-7 and 11-9-14, and 16 in BT-549) was found. The alignment of the peptide sequence of one representative human breast cell line
(MCF-12A) with that of the humanMn-SOD from the GenBank (M36693)
is shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4
Alignment of peptide sequence of MCF-12A Mn-SOD gene
with that of human GenBank (M36693) sequence.
DISCUSSION
Mn-SOD plays a key role in protecting cells against oxidative
damage and regulating cellular concentration of
, which is a highly reactive oxidant and an
unwanted product of cellular metabolism [21]. Many different
types of tumors have been demonstrated to have low Mn-SOD
activity [22]. Overexpression of Mn-SOD suppresses the
tumorigenicity of humanmelanoma cells, breast cancer cells, and
glioma cells, suggesting that Mn-SOD is a tumor suppressor gene
in a wide variety of cancers [15,
23, 24].Several reports have however shown that despite generally low
levels of Mn-SOD in the center of solid tumor nests, there
appeared to be very intense Mn-SOD staining in a few tumor cells
located at the leading edge or outside layers of tumors adjacent
to benign epithelium in breast and prostate tumors [25,
26].
In addition, Mn-SOD expression is increased in metastatic gastric
cancer [27]. Lam et al [28] demonstrated that overexpression of Mn-SOD by adenovirus gene transfer in hamster
squamous carcinoma cells stimulated tumor cell invasive capacity
and this elevation was abolished by adenovirus catalase
suggesting the involvement of ROS and particularly by hydrogen
peroxide in the process of tumor invasion. Reconstitution of
Mn-SOD in tumor cells induces cell resistance to the cytotoxic
effects of TNF-α, ionizing, and hyperthermia [29,
30, 31],
suggesting that Mn-SOD functions not only as a tumor
suppressor but also as a mediator in signaling cell resistance to
ROS-induced cytotoxicity [32].In our study, we find high activity of Mn-SOD in certain breast
cancer cell lines especially in MCF-7 cell line
(Table 1). We speculate that this elevation of Mn-SOD
in cancerous breast tissues without a corresponding increase in
the activity of catalase and/or glutathione peroxidase would lead
to the accumulation of peroxides and oxidative stress and will
enhance the progression of cancer. Siemankowski et al [31]
also showed a similar kind of activity (∼ 40 U SOD/mg
protein) in MCF-7 cell line. Mn-SOD may play a dual role in
relation to exposure to ROS. Humancancer has frequently
decreased Mn-SOD levels. However, although it is clearly an
important scavenger of ROS, the production of H2O2 by
Mn-SOD in specific circumstances may lead to potentially
carcinogenic effects, especially if some individuals have a
decreased capacity to remove H2O2 by glutathione
peroxidase or catalase. Alternatively, better scavenging capacity
may decrease the ability to undergo normal cellular protective
mechanisms such as apoptosis; therefore, oxidative stresses would
have a greater likelihood of nuclear DNA mutation [33,
34].
According to our results (Tables 3 and
4), a
G- to C- substitution in 130 positions in MCF-12A
(nontumorigenic) was found that changes the amino acid codon at
12 positions in the peptide from Q to H. But this
change was not observed in MCF-7, BT-549, and 11-9-14 cell lines.
Rosenblum et al [35] suggest that the alteration may affect
the cellular allocation of the enzyme and transport of Mn-SOD
into the mitochondrion where it would be biologically available.
They further suggest that inefficient targeting of Mn-SOD could
leave mitochondria without their full defense against superoxide
radicals, which could lead to protein oxidation as well as
mitochondrial DNA mutations. Overexpression of Mn-SOD perhaps
causes (a) a decrease in the malignant phenotypes of various
types of cancer including breast cancer [15,
23], (b) an
increase in the resistance for cytotoxicity from tumor necrosis
factor α in breast cancer [30,
36], (c) an increase
in apoptosis [37], and (d) an improvement in apoptosis after
hydrogen peroxide challenge [37]. It is also possible that
mitochondrial Mn-SOD could impact on oxidative damage in nuclear
DNA, which would be one plausible mechanism for increased risk
from a genetic polymorphism in Mn-SOD, although the effects on
the mitochondrion alone could be sufficient for its impact on
carcinogenesis. Thus, there are a number of ways that changes in
the cellular distribution of Mn-SOD might affect breast cancer
risk. It should further be noted that this is the first study on
the nucleotide and amino acid sequence of Mn-SOD gene in breast
epithelial cell lines. This information will be useful in future
design of experiments involving Mn-SOD gene in breast epithelial
cell lines. Now in our laboratory, we are trying to sequence the
whole Mn-SOD cDNA as well as the expression of Mn-SOD mRNA by
northern blot analysis.
Authors: D G Bostwick; E E Alexander; R Singh; A Shan; J Qian; R M Santella; L W Oberley; T Yan; W Zhong; X Jiang; T D Oberley Journal: Cancer Date: 2000-07-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: R Kinscherf; R Claus; M Wagner; C Gehrke; H Kamencic; D Hou; O Nauen; W Schmiedt; G Kovacs; J Pill; J Metz; H P Deigner Journal: FASEB J Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Aaron K Holley; Kelley K Kiningham; Douglas R Spitz; Dean P Edwards; Jeffrey T Jenkins; Michael R Moore Journal: J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol Date: 2009-06-27 Impact factor: 4.292
Authors: Ser Yue Loo; Jayshree L Hirpara; Vijay Pandey; Tuan Zea Tan; Celestial T Yap; Peter E Lobie; Jean Paul Thiery; Boon Cher Goh; Shazib Pervaiz; Marie-Véronique Clément; Alan Prem Kumar Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2016-08-20 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Alan Prem Kumar; Ser Yue Loo; Sung Won Shin; Tuan Zea Tan; Chon Boon Eng; Rajeev Singh; Thomas Choudary Putti; Chee Wee Ong; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Boon Cher Goh; Joo In Park; Jean Paul Thiery; Shazib Pervaiz; Marie Veronique Clement Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Sarah M Mense; Fabrizio Remotti; Ashima Bhan; Bhupendra Singh; Mahmoud El-Tamer; Tom K Hei; Hari K Bhat Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol Date: 2008-07-01 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Meena K Sakharkar; Babita Shashni; Karun Sharma; Sarinder K Dhillon; Prabhakar R Ranjekar; Kishore R Sakharkar Journal: PPAR Res Date: 2013-02-03 Impact factor: 4.964