Literature DB >> 15466279

Catheter-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials.

Giovanni F M Strippoli1, Allison Tong, David Johnson, Francesco P Schena, Jonathan C Craig.   

Abstract

As many as 15 to 50% of end-stage kidney disease patients are on peritoneal dialysis (PD), but peritonitis limits its more widespread use. Several PD catheter-related interventions (catheter designs, surgical insertion approaches, and connection methods) have been purported to reduce the risk of peritonitis in PD. The goal was to assess the trial evidence supporting their use. The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists were searched for randomized trials of catheter types and related interventions in PD. Two reviewers extracted data on the rates of peritonitis and exit-site/tunnel infection, catheter removal/replacement, technique failure, and all-cause mortality. Analysis was by a random effects model, and results are expressed as relative risk and 95% confidence intervals. Thirty-seven eligible trials (2822 patients) were identified: eight of surgical strategies of catheter insertion, eight of straight versus coiled catheters, 10 of Y-set versus conventional spike systems, four of Y-set versus double-bag systems, and seven of other interventions. Despite the large total number of patients, few trials covered the same interventions, small numbers of patients were enrolled in each trial, and the methodologic quality was suboptimal. Y-set and twin-bag systems were superior to conventional spike systems (seven trials, 485 patients; relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence intervals 0.53 to 0.77), and no other catheter-related intervention was demonstrated to prevent peritonitis in PD. This systematic review demonstrates that of all catheter-related interventions designed to prevent peritonitis in PD, only disconnect (twin-bag and Y-set) systems have been proved to be effective (compared with conventional spike systems). Despite the importance of PD as a renal replacement therapy modality and the large number of patients who receive it, it is still not known whether any particular PD catheter designs, implantation techniques, or modalities are effective, given the limitations of available trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15466279     DOI: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000141463.95561.79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  33 in total

1.  In vitro microbiology studies on a new peritoneal dialysis connector.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Bonaventura; Paolo Cerasoli; Arianna Pompilio; Fabio Arrizza; Lorenzo Di Liberato; Antonio Stingone; Vittorio Sirolli; Arduino Arduini; Mario Bonomini
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 2.  Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis.

Authors:  Cheuk-Chun Szeto; Philip Kam-Tao Li
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Preperitoneal tunneling-a novel technique in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion.

Authors:  Mohammad-Hadi Saeed Modaghegh; Gholamhossein Kazemzadeh; Yaser Rajabnejad; Fatemeh Nazemian
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Our war against bacteria in peritoneal dialysis, the last 40 years!

Authors:  Dimitrios G Oreopoulos; Antonios H Tzamaloukas
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Peritoneal dialysis associated infections: An update on diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Jacob A Akoh
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-06

6.  Videolaparoscopic catheter placement reduces contraindications to peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Stefano Santarelli; Matthias Zeiler; Tania Monteburini; Rosa Maria Agostinelli; Rita Marinelli; Giorgio Degano; Emilio Ceraudo
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 7.  Consensus guidelines for the prevention and treatment of catheter-related infections and peritonitis in pediatric patients receiving peritoneal dialysis: 2012 update.

Authors:  Bradley A Warady; Sevcan Bakkaloglu; Jason Newland; Michelle Cantwell; Enrico Verrina; Alicia Neu; Vimal Chadha; Hui-Kim Yap; Franz Schaefer
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 8.  A contemporary approach to the prevention of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis in children: the role of improvement science.

Authors:  Allison Redpath Mahon; Alicia M Neu
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  Impact of age on peritonitis risk in peritoneal dialysis patients: an era effect.

Authors:  Sharon J Nessim; Joanne M Bargman; Peter C Austin; Ken Story; Sarbjit V Jassal
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Timing, causes, predictors and prognosis of switching from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis: a prospective study.

Authors:  Bernard G Jaar; Laura C Plantinga; Deidra C Crews; Nancy E Fink; Nasser Hebah; Josef Coresh; Alan S Kliger; Neil R Powe
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.