Literature DB >> 23209040

Videolaparoscopic catheter placement reduces contraindications to peritoneal dialysis.

Stefano Santarelli1, Matthias Zeiler, Tania Monteburini, Rosa Maria Agostinelli, Rita Marinelli, Giorgio Degano, Emilio Ceraudo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Videolaparoscopy is considered the reference method for peritoneal catheter placement in patients with previous abdominal surgery. The placement procedure is usually performed with at least two access sites: one for the catheter and the second for the laparoscope. Here, we describe a new one-port laparoscopic procedure that uses only one abdominal access site in patients not eligible for laparotomic catheter placement.
METHOD: We carried out one-port laparoscopic placement in 21 patients presenting contraindications to blind surgical procedures because of prior abdominal surgery. This technique consists in the creation of a single mini-laparotomy access through which laparoscopic procedures and placement are performed. The catheter, rectified by an introducer, is inserted inside the port. Subsequently, the port is removed, leaving the catheter in pelvic position. The port is reintroduced laterally to the catheter, confirming or correcting its position. Laparotomic placement was performed in a contemporary group of 32 patients without contraindications to blind placement. Complications and long-term catheter outcome in the two groups were evaluated.
RESULTS: Additional interventions during placement were necessary in 12 patients of the laparoscopy group compared with 5 patients of the laparotomy group (p = 0.002). Laparoscopy documented adhesions in 13 patients, with need for adhesiolysis in 6 patients. Each group had 1 intraoperative complication: leakage in the laparoscopy group, and intestinal perforation in the laparotomy group. During the 2-year follow-up period, laparoscopic revisions had to be performed in 6 patients of the laparoscopy group and in 5 patients of the laparotomy group (p = 0.26). The 1-year catheter survival was similar in both groups. Laparoscopy increased by 40% the number of patients eligible to receive peritoneal dialysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Videolaparoscopy placement in patients not eligible for blind surgical procedures seems to be equivalent to laparotomic placement with regard to complications and long-term catheter outcome. The number of patients able to receive peritoneal dialysis is substantially increased.

Entities:  

Keywords:  One-port placement; Tenckhoff catheter; adhesiolysis; contraindication; surgical placement; technical survival; videolaparoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23209040      PMCID: PMC3707714          DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of open and laparoscopic secure placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters.

Authors:  P Soontrapornchai; T Simapatanapong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A laparoscopic method for optimal peritoneal dialysis access.

Authors:  John H Crabtree; Arnold Fishman
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Laparoscopic-assisted peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Girolamo Mattioli; Marco Castagnetti; Enrico Verrina; Antonella Trivelli; Michele Torre; Vincenzo Jasonni; Francesco Perfumo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Peritoneoscopic versus surgical placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a prospective randomized study on outcome.

Authors:  M F Gadallah; A Pervez; M A el-Shahawy; D Sorrells; G Zibari; J McDonald; J Work
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Laparoscopic introduction of a continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (capd) catheter by a two-puncture technique.

Authors:  P H Nijhuis; J F Smulders; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Randomized prospective comparison of laparoscopic and open peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion.

Authors:  M J Wright; K Bel'eed; B F Johnson; D W Eadington; L Sellars; M J Farr
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Secure placement of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheters under laparoscopic assistance.

Authors:  J Y Wang; J S Hsieh; F M Chen; C H Chuan; H M Chan; T J Huang
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  The effects of previous abdominal operations and intraperitoneal adhesions on the outcome of peritoneal dialysis catheters.

Authors:  Amir Keshvari; Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli; Alipasha Meysamie; Sepideh Seifi; Mohammad Kazem Nouri Taromloo
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Endoscopic transluminal insertion of a peritoneal dialysis catheter.

Authors:  Thomas Mettang; Bernd Krumme; Arne Wilhelm; Lothar Duschka
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Single-port laparoscopic insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheters in children.

Authors:  I Milliken; M Fitzpatrick; R Subramaniam
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 1.830

View more
  1 in total

1.  Implantation of peritoneal catheters by laparotomy: nephrologists obtained similar results to general surgeons.

Authors:  Cesar A Restrepo; Carlos Alberto Buitrago; Cielo Holguin
Journal:  Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis       Date:  2014-10-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.