Literature DB >> 15465446

Motor unit excitability changes mediating vestibulocollic reflexes in the sternocleidomastoid muscle.

J G Colebatch1, J C Rothwell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the patterns of motor unit firing in single motor units from the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles in response to stimuli previously shown to be capable of evoking vestibulocollic reflexes (loud clicks and electrical stimulation) and to relate these to the previously described surface potentials (VEMPs, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials) evoked by the same stimuli.
METHODS: Eleven male subjects (30-43-years-old) were studied. Local anaesthetic was used to block the SCM and confirm that the surface potentials (p13n23) arose from it. At another time, fine wire or needle electrodes were used to record single motor unit activity and peristimulus time histograms were constructed.
RESULTS: Local anaesthetic block reduced or abolished the p13n23 response in 5 of 6 subjects. A total of 94 histograms of motor unit discharges were recorded. The excitability changes seen were always small. Loud click stimuli given ipsilaterally evoked short latency (mean 14.2 ms, uncorrected for triggering delays), and short duration (mean 3.6 ms) inhibition. Contralaterally, the effect was excitatory (latency 11.9 ms, uncorrected, mean duration 2.3 ms). For electrical stimulation, short latency inhibition occurred ipsilateral to the cathode (average latency 14.0 ms, uncorrected, mean duration 2.9 ms) and excitation occurred contralaterally.
CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that the SCM is the sole or dominant source of the VEMPs recorded from electrodes over it. Short latency, short duration motor unit firing changes are evoked in SCM by loud clicks and electrical stimulation, stimuli known to be capable of evoking vestibulocollic reflexes. VEMPs beginning with a positivity correspond to inhibition of the underlying motor unit firing and those starting with a negativity correspond to an underlying excitation, findings consistent with intracellular recordings of otolith effects. Qualitative explanations of how the surface potentials are generated by these excitability changes and relating to other properties of the surface responses are proposed. SIGNIFICANCE: This study has shown consistent patterns of single motor unit firing which underlie VEMPs evoked by both clicks and short duration galvanic stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15465446     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  33 in total

1.  [Recording cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: part 1: anatomy, physiology, methods and normal findings].

Authors:  L E Walther; K Hörmann; O Pfaar
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Asymmetries in vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in chronic stroke survivors with spastic hypertonia: evidence for a vestibulospinal role.

Authors:  Derek M Miller; Cliff S Klein; Nina L Suresh; William Z Rymer
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Intracortical modulation of cortical-bulbar responses for the masseter muscle.

Authors:  Enzo Ortu; Franca Deriu; Antonio Suppa; Elena Giaconi; Eusebio Tolu; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Properties of rectified averaging of an evoked-type signal: theory and application to the vestibular-evoked myogenic potential.

Authors:  J G Colebatch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The Cervical Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials (cVEMPs) Recorded Along the Sternocleidomastoid Muscles During Head Rotation and Flexion in Normal Human Subjects.

Authors:  Alexander Ashford; Jun Huang; Chunming Zhang; Wei Wei; William Mustain; Thomas Eby; Hong Zhu; Wu Zhou
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-22

6.  Vergence increases the amplitude of lateral ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  László T Tamás; Americo A Migliaccio; Christopher J Todd; Michael C Schubert; Béla Büki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Vestibular Evoked Myographic Correlation.

Authors:  Bernd Lütkenhöner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-12

8.  Differential effects of duration for ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials evoked by air- and bone-conducted stimuli.

Authors:  Louis J Z Lim; Danielle L Dennis; Sendhil Govender; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effects of motion sickness severity on the vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Cynthia G Fowler; Amanda Sweet; Emily Steffel
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Input-output functions of vestibular afferent responses to air-conducted clicks in rats.

Authors:  Hong Zhu; Xuehui Tang; Wei Wei; Adel Maklad; William Mustain; Richard Rabbitt; Steve Highstein; Jerome Allison; Wu Zhou
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.