Literature DB >> 15465194

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy as primary treatment for prostate cancer: acute toxicity in 114 patients.

Gert De Meerleer1, Luc Vakaet, Sabine Meersschout, Geert Villeirs, Antony Verbaeys, Wim Oosterlinck, Wilfried De Neve.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Dose escalation improves local control in prostate cancer. At Ghent University Hospital, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is used to increase the dose to the prostate and/or seminal vesicles. We report on acute toxicity in 114 patients who received IMRT for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was initiated after approval of our ethics committee. A class solution was used to plan all cases. Three beams (gantry 0 degrees , 116 degrees , and 244 degrees ) and anatomy-based segmentation were used to create an intensity-modulated dose distribution. Maximal rectal dose was set at 2 Gy per fraction. Detailed dose-volume histograms for all relevant structures were present. For all patients, we determined the pretreatment morbidity by a detailed preradiotherapy, in-house developed symptom scale. All patients were treated with 18 MV photons of an Elekta linear accelerator. Patients were seen on a weekly basis during treatment, and 1 month (M1) and 3 months (M3) thereafter. The registration of acute toxicity was standardized by a fixed questionnaire. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity scale served as a basis, but additional symptoms, such as rectal blood loss, urgency, and incontinence, were scored as well.
RESULTS: All 114 IMRT plans were delivered successfully without any interruption or technical problem. Daily treatment time was always less than 8 min and less than 6 min in 90% of the cases. Grade 1 and Grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were observed in 44% and 29% of the patients, respectively, during the whole period. If only the RTOG scale was used, Grade 1 and Grade 2 GI toxicities were noted in 39% and 27% of the patients, respectively, leaving 34% free of acute RTOG-scaled toxicity. Grade 3 genitourinary (GU) toxicity was seen in 8 patients (7%), all but 1 during treatment. Grade 2 and Grade 1 GU toxicities were seen in 36% and 47% of the patients, respectively, leaving only 10% free of acute GU toxicity. DISCUSSION: Anatomy-based IMRT to treat prostate cancer is incorporated into our daily routine without any problem. Acute toxicity is very low. Most of the recorded symptoms decrease over time, except for GI urgency and incontinence. The incorporation of additional symptoms makes the scoring more detailed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15465194     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  27 in total

1.  Clinical implementation of volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with ERGO++.

Authors:  Dirk Wolff; Florian Stieler; Brigitte Hermann; Katharina Heim; Sven Clausen; Jens Fleckenstein; Martin Polednik; Volker Steil; Frederik Wenz; Frank Lohr
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Dose-escalated simultaneous integrated-boost treatment of prostate cancer patients via helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  M Geier; S T Astner; M N Duma; V Jacob; C Nieder; J Putzhammer; C Winkler; M Molls; H Geinitz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Moderate hypofractionation and simultaneous integrated boost with volumetric modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) for prostate cancer. Report of feasibility and acute toxicity.

Authors:  F Alongi; A Fogliata; P Navarria; A Tozzi; P Mancosu; F Lobefalo; G Reggiori; A Clivio; L Cozzi; M Scorsetti
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 4.  The efficacy of conventional external beam, three-dimensional conformal, intensity-modulated, particle beam radiation, and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tony Y Eng; Join Y Luh; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Dosimetry and preliminary acute toxicity in the first 100 men treated for prostate cancer on a randomized hypofractionation dose escalation trial.

Authors:  Alan Pollack; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Steven J Feigenberg; Andre A Konski; Benjamin Movsas; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo; C-M Charlie Ma; Shawn W McNeeley; Mark K Buyyounouski; Robert A Price
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Gastrointestinal symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy: a national survey of gastroenterologists.

Authors:  C C Henson; S E Davidson; A Lalji; R P Symonds; R Swindell; H J N Andreyev
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Intensity-modulated arc therapy with cisplatin as neo-adjuvant treatment for primary irresectable cervical cancer. Toxicity, tumour response and outcome.

Authors:  K Vandecasteele; A Makar; R Van den Broecke; L Delrue; H Denys; K Lambein; B Lambert; M van Eijkeren; P Tummers; G De Meerleer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Comparison of dosimetric parameters and acute toxicity after whole-pelvic vs prostate-only volumetric-modulated arc therapy with daily image guidance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kentaro Ishii; Ryo Ogino; Yukinari Hosokawa; Chiaki Fujioka; Wataru Okada; Ryota Nakahara; Ryu Kawamorita; Takuhito Tada; Yoshiki Hayashi; Toshifumi Nakajima
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  A novel method for predicting late genitourinary toxicity after prostate radiation therapy and the need for age-based risk-adapted dose constraints.

Authors:  Awad A Ahmed; Brian Egleston; Pino Alcantara; Linna Li; Alan Pollack; Eric M Horwitz; Mark K Buyyounouski
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Positional reproducibility and effects of a rectal balloon in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jae Ho Cho; Chang-Geol Lee; Dae Ryong Kang; Jooho Kim; Sangkyu Lee; Chang-Ok Suh; Jinsil Seong; Yang Gun Suh; Ikjae Lee; Gwi Eon Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.