Literature DB >> 15464356

What is common to brain activity evoked by the perception of visual and auditory filled durations? A study with MEG and EEG co-recordings.

Karim N'Diaye1, Richard Ragot, Line Garnero, Viviane Pouthas.   

Abstract

EEG and MEG scalp data were simultaneously recorded while human participants were performing a duration discrimination task in visual and auditory modality, separately. Short durations were used ranging from 500 to 900 ms, among which participants had to discriminate a previously memorized 700-ms "standard" duration. Behavioral results show accurate but variable performance within and between participants with expected modality effects: the percentage of responses was greater and the mean response time was shorter for auditory than for visual signals. Sustained electric and magnetic activities were obtained correlatively to duration estimation, but with distinct spatiotemporal properties. Electric CNV-like potentials showed fronto-central negativity in both modalities, whereas magnetic sustained fields were distributed with respect to the modality of the interval to be timed. Time courses of these slow brain activities were found to be dependent on stimulus duration but not on its modality nor on the recording signal (EEG or MEG). Source reconstruction demonstrated that these sustained potentials/fields were generated by superimposed contributions from visual and auditory cortices (sustained sensory responses, SSR) and from prefrontal and parietal regions. By using these two complementary techniques, we thus demonstrated the involvement of frontal and parietal cerebral cortex in human timing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15464356     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  16 in total

Review 1.  Minding time in an amodal representational space.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Individual versus task differences in slow potential generators.

Authors:  Luis F H Basile; João R Sato; Henrique A Pasquini; Bruna Velasques; Pedro Ribeiro; Renato Anghinah
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  'Time-shrinking perception' in the visual system: a psychophysical and high-density ERP study.

Authors:  Atsushi Nagaike; Takako Mitsudo; Yoshitaka Nakajima; Katsuya Ogata; Takao Yamasaki; Yoshinobu Goto; Shozo Tobimatsu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cortical representation of persistent visual stimuli.

Authors:  Edden M Gerber; Tal Golan; Robert T Knight; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The role of cortical beta oscillations in time estimation.

Authors:  Shrikanth Kulashekhar; Johanna Pekkola; Jaakko Matias Palva; Satu Palva
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Temporal accumulation and decision processes in the duration bisection task revealed by contingent negative variation.

Authors:  Kwun Kei Ng; Simon Tobin; Trevor B Penney
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-29

7.  The duality of temporal encoding - the intrinsic and extrinsic representation of time.

Authors:  Ronen Golan; Dan Zakay
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-31

8.  The neuromagnetic dynamics of time perception.

Authors:  Frederick W Carver; Brita Elvevåg; Mario Altamura; Daniel R Weinberger; Richard Coppola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Subject-specific, multiscale simulation of electrophysiology: a software pipeline for image-based models and application examples.

Authors:  R S MacLeod; J G Stinstra; S Lew; R T Whitaker; D J Swenson; M J Cole; J Krüger; D H Brooks; C R Johnson
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Distortions of subjective time perception within and across senses.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove; Dean V Buonomano; Shinsuke Shimojo; Ladan Shams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.