Literature DB >> 15458326

Process considerations and economic evaluation of two-step steam pretreatment for production of fuel ethanol from softwood.

Anders Wingren1, Johanna Söderström, Mats Galbe, Guido Zacchi.   

Abstract

To increase the overall ethanol yield from softwood, the steam pretreatment stage can be carried out in two steps. The two-step pretreatment process was evaluated from a techno-economic standpoint and compared with the one-step pretreatment process. The production plants considered were designed to utilize spruce as raw material and have a capacity of 200,000 tons/year. The two-step process resulted in a higher ethanol yield and a lower requirement for enzymes. However, the two-step process is more capital-intensive and has a higher energy requirement. The estimated ethanol production cost was the same, 4.13 SEK/L (55.1 cent /L) for both alternatives. For the two-step process different energy-saving options were considered, such as a higher concentration of water-insoluble solids in the filter cake before the second step, and the possibility of excluding the pressure reduction between the steps. The most optimistic configuration, with 50% water-insoluble solids in the filter cake in the feed to the second pretreatment step, no pressure reduction between the pretreatment steps, and 77% overall ethanol yield (0.25 kg EtOH/kg dry wood), resulted in a production cost of 3.90 SEK/L (52.0 cent /L). This shows the potential for the two-step pretreatment process, which, however, remains to be verified in pilot trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15458326     DOI: 10.1021/bp049931v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Prog        ISSN: 1520-6033


  6 in total

1.  Impact of pretreatment and downstream processing technologies on economics and energy in cellulosic ethanol production.

Authors:  Deepak Kumar; Ganti S Murthy
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 6.040

2.  A strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae evolved for fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass displays improved growth and fermentative ability in high solids concentrations and in the presence of inhibitory compounds.

Authors:  Gary M Hawkins; Joy Doran-Peterson
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 6.040

3.  The greenhouse gas emissions performance of cellulosic ethanol supply chains in Europe.

Authors:  Raphael Slade; Ausilio Bauen; Nilay Shah
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 6.040

4.  The commercial performance of cellulosic ethanol supply-chains in Europe.

Authors:  Raphael Slade; Ausilio Bauen; Nilay Shah
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 6.040

5.  Techno-economic evaluation of integrated first- and second-generation ethanol production from grain and straw.

Authors:  Elisabeth Joelsson; Borbála Erdei; Mats Galbe; Ola Wallberg
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  How does technology pathway choice influence economic viability and environmental impacts of lignocellulosic biorefineries?

Authors:  Karthik Rajendran; Ganti S Murthy
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 6.040

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.