Literature DB >> 15457759

Quantitative measurement of spinal brace use and compliance in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

G P Nicholson1, M W Ferguson-Pell, K Smith, M Edgar, T Morley.   

Abstract

The objective measurement of compliance with spinal bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is fundamental in the validation of clinical trials of bracing effectiveness, and in helping clinicians better understand reasons behind poor compliance. Current technology has been developed and tested for discrete, reliable and objective measurement of the times of day a brace is worn and consistency in its use. TLSOs were instrumented with data loggers measuring temperature at the skin/brace interface at 16 minutes intervals over a period of 88 days; between routine follow up and without patient interference. 10 female patients (age 14 years, sd 1.1) with AIS using spinal bracing as part of their treatment regime took part in the study over 15 months. Skin/brace interface temperature during periods of wear in the UK was >30 degrees C, ambient 23 degrees C, sd 4. Compliance ranged from 8-90%, average 65%. Patients tended to over estimate their compliance by 150% (sd 50%). There was no significant difference between weekday and weekend compliance but wear patterns differed. Nightwear was significantly greater than daywear. Patients with very good compliance only removed their brace for washing or exercise periods but where poor compliance was evident, the brace was only worn sporadically during the day. Temperature provides a clear signal of brace use and can be used for long-term data logging using discrete instrumentation, providing a tool to help identify and understand the reasons behind poor compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 15457759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  9 in total

1.  [Claims and realities of brace treatment : Primary correction of scoliosis in children and adolescents].

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsaknakis; Lena Braunschweig; Heiko M Lorenz; Anna K Hell
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Objective compliance of adolescent girls with idiopathic scoliosis in a dynamic SpineCor brace.

Authors:  Carol C Hasler; Stephanie Wietlisbach; Philippe Büchler
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Prospective evaluation of physical activity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis or kyphosis receiving brace treatment.

Authors:  Carsten Müller; Katharina Fuchs; Corinna Winter; Dieter Rosenbaum; Carolin Schmidt; Viola Bullmann; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Is nighttime bracing effective in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A meta-analysis and systematic review based on scoliosis research society guidelines.

Authors:  Abdul Fettah Buyuk; Walter H Truong; Sara J Morgan; Andrew J Snyder; Dan J Miller; Kristine K Nolin; Kristin J Smith
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-10-21

5.  In defense of adolescents: They really do use braces for the hours prescribed, if good help is provided. Results from a prospective everyday clinic cohort using thermobrace.

Authors:  Sabrina Donzelli; Fabio Zaina; Stefano Negrini
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2012-05-31

6.  Why do we treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? What we want to obtain and to avoid for our patients. SOSORT 2005 Consensus paper.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Theodoros B Grivas; Tomasz Kotwicki; Toru Maruyama; Manuel Rigo; Hans Rudolf Weiss
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-04-10

7.  The Sforzesco brace can replace cast in the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A controlled prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Salvatore Atanasio; Francesco Negrini; Fabio Zaina; Gianfranco Marchini
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2008-10-31

8.  Correlation between compliance and brace treatment in juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: SOSORT 2014 award winner.

Authors:  Angelo G Aulisa; Marco Giordano; Francesco Falciglia; Emanuele Marzetti; Andrea Poscia; Vincenzo Guzzanti
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2014-06-13

9.  Dual modality of vertebral body tethering : anterior scoliosis correction versus growth modulation with mean follow-up of five years.

Authors:  Jason Bernard; Timothy Bishop; Jan Herzog; Shahnawaz Haleem; Cristina Lupu; Bisola Ajayi; Darren F Lui
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.