Literature DB >> 15456858

Genome-wide analysis of the relationship between transcriptional regulation by Rpd3p and the histone H3 and H4 amino termini in budding yeast.

Nevin Sabet1, Sam Volo, Cailin Yu, James P Madigan, Randall H Morse.   

Abstract

The histone amino termini have emerged as key targets for a variety of modifying enzymes that function as transcriptional coactivators and corepressors. However, an important question that has remained largely unexplored is the extent to which specific histone amino termini are required for the activating and repressive functions of these enzymes, Here we address this issue by focusing on the prototypical histone deacetylase, Rpd3p, in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show that targeting Rpd3p to a reporter gene in this yeast can partially repress transcription when either the histone H3 or the histone H4 amino terminus is deleted, indicating that the "tails" are individually dispensable for repression by Rpd3p. In contrast, we find that the effect of rpd3 gene disruption on global gene expression is considerably reduced in either a histone H3Delta1-28 (H3 lacking the amino-terminal 28 amino acids) or a histone H4(K5,8,12,16Q) (H4 with lysine residues 5, 8, 12, and 16 changed to glutamine residues) background compared to the wild-type background, indicating a requirement for one or both of these histone tails in Rpd3p-mediated regulation for many genes. These results suggest that acetylation of either the H3 or the H4 amino terminus could suffice to allow the activation of such genes. We also examine the relationship between H3 tails and H4 tails in global gene expression and find substantial overlap among the gene sets regulated by these histone tails. We also show that the effects on genome-wide expression of deleting the H3 or H4 amino terminus are similar but not identical to the effects of mutating the lysine residues in these same regions. These results indicate that the gene regulatory potential of the H3 and H4 amino termini is substantially but not entirely contained in these modifiable lysine residues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15456858      PMCID: PMC517902          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.20.8823-8833.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  52 in total

Review 1.  Acetylation: a regulatory modification to rival phosphorylation?

Authors:  T Kouzarides
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  The language of covalent histone modifications.

Authors:  B D Strahl; C D Allis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Signaling to chromatin through histone modifications.

Authors:  P Cheung; C D Allis; P Sassone-Corsi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-10-13       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Ssn6-Tup1 interacts with class I histone deacetylases required for repression.

Authors:  A D Watson; D G Edmondson; J R Bone; Y Mukai; Y Yu; W Du; D J Stillman; S Y Roth
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 5.  Histone acetylation and an epigenetic code.

Authors:  B M Turner
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  Multiple links between the NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex and epigenetic control of transcription.

Authors:  L Galarneau; A Nourani; A A Boudreault; Y Zhang; L Héliot; S Allard; J Savard; W S Lane; D J Stillman; J Côté
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Phosphorylation of linker histone H1 regulates gene expression in vivo by creating a charge patch.

Authors:  Y Dou; M A Gorovsky
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 8.  Acetylation of histones and transcription-related factors.

Authors:  D E Sterner; S L Berger
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.056

9.  Genetic analysis of histone H4: essential role of lysines subject to reversible acetylation.

Authors:  P C Megee; B A Morgan; B A Mittman; M M Smith
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-02-16       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Artificially recruited TATA-binding protein fails to remodel chromatin and does not activate three promoters that require chromatin remodeling.

Authors:  M P Ryan; G A Stafford; L Yu; R H Morse
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  28 in total

1.  Characterization of a highly conserved histone related protein, Ydl156w, and its functional associations using quantitative proteomic analyses.

Authors:  Joshua M Gilmore; Mihaela E Sardiu; Swaminathan Venkatesh; Brent Stutzman; Allison Peak; Chris W Seidel; Jerry L Workman; Laurence Florens; Michael P Washburn
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Deciphering the roles of the histone H2B N-terminal domain in genome-wide transcription.

Authors:  Michael A Parra; David Kerr; Deirdre Fahy; Derek J Pouchnik; John J Wyrick
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Genome-wide analysis of chromatin status using tiling microarrays.

Authors:  Sushma Shivaswamy; Vishwanath R Iyer
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  Dispersed mutations in histone H3 that affect transcriptional repression and chromatin structure of the CHA1 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Qiye He; Cailin Yu; Randall H Morse
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2008-07-25

5.  Set2-dependent K36 methylation is regulated by novel intratail interactions within H3.

Authors:  James N Psathas; Suting Zheng; Song Tan; Joseph C Reese
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Direct role for the Rpd3 complex in transcriptional induction of the anaerobic DAN/TIR genes in yeast.

Authors:  Odeniel Sertil; Arvind Vemula; Sharon L Salmon; Randall H Morse; Charles V Lowry
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Functional interaction between the Drosophila knirps short range transcriptional repressor and RPD3 histone deacetylase.

Authors:  Paolo Struffi; David N Arnosti
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Asymmetric relationships between proteins shape genome evolution.

Authors:  Richard A Notebaart; Philip R Kensche; Martijn A Huynen; Bas E Dutilh
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Acetylation of the transcriptional repressor Ume6p allows efficient promoter release and timely induction of the meiotic transient transcription program in yeast.

Authors:  Michael J Law; Michael J Mallory; Roland L Dunbrack; Randy Strich
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  The histone deacetylase Rpd3p is required for transient changes in genomic expression in response to stress.

Authors:  Adriana L Alejandro-Osorio; Dana J Huebert; Dominic T Porcaro; Megan E Sonntag; Songdet Nillasithanukroh; Jessica L Will; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.