Literature DB >> 1545672

Quantification of complex flow using MR phase imaging--a study of parameters influencing the phase/velocity relation.

F Ståhlberg1, L Søndergaard, C Thomsen, O Henriksen.   

Abstract

In this study, we describe how motion-induced phase angle is affected by different flow models and imaging parameters when using the MR flow phase mapping technique. In a phantom with straight as well as constricted tubes, simulating healthy and stenotic vessels, nonpulsatile flow in the velocity range 0-1 m/sec was maintained. The phase/velocity relation was studied for various degrees of complex flow caused by the constriction, and regions with a breakdown in linearity were determined. Further studies in these regions were made regarding the influence of pulse sequence parameters on the phase/velocity relation. The results showed that in poststenotic areas characterized by so-called separated flow, the phase/velocity relation became nonlinear due to dephasing effects. In regions with fully developed turbulent flow in straight tubes, however, no breakdown in linearity was observed. Parameters seen to have a substantial influence on the phase/velocity relation were first- and second-order velocity encoding and voxel size. Finally, a pilot in vivo demonstration of complex flow was done using a sequence designed to be robust with respect to linearity of the phase/velocity relation. The results indicate that the MR phase mapping technique can be used to measure flow quantitatively in regions with complex flow. This opens possibilities for future clinical use of the technique in the study of areas of complex flow such as valvular heart disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1545672     DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(92)90368-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  10 in total

1.  Assessment of prosthetic aortic valve performance by magnetic resonance velocity imaging.

Authors:  R Botnar; E Nagel; M B Scheidegger; E M Pedersen; O Hess; P Boesiger
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Renal arteries: isotropic, high-spatial-resolution, unenhanced MR angiography with three-dimensional radial phase contrast.

Authors:  Christopher J François; Darren P Lum; Kevin M Johnson; Benjamin R Landgraf; Thorsten A Bley; Scott B Reeder; Mark L Schiebler; Thomas M Grist; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  In vivo evaluation of quantitative MR angiography in a canine carotid artery stenosis model.

Authors:  M Calderon-Arnulphi; S Amin-Hanjani; A Alaraj; M Zhao; X Du; S Ruland; X J Zhou; K R Thulborn; F T Charbel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Four-dimensional flow MRI for evaluation of post-stenotic turbulent flow in a phantom: comparison with flowmeter and computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Jihoon Kweon; Dong Hyun Yang; Guk Bae Kim; Namkug Kim; MunYoung Paek; Aurelien F Stalder; Andreas Greiser; Young-Hak Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging guided catheterisation for assessment of pulmonary vascular resistance: in vivo validation and clinical application in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  T Kuehne; S Yilmaz; I Schulze-Neick; E Wellnhofer; P Ewert; E Nagel; P Lange
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance angiography: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Michael P Hartung; Thomas M Grist; Christopher J François
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Effects of gadolinium contrast agent on aortic blood flow and myocardial strain measurements by phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Erik Hedström; Karin Markenroth Bloch; Erik Bergvall; Freddy Ståhlberg; Håkan Arheden
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Efficient method for volumetric assessment of peak blood flow velocity using 4D flow MRI.

Authors:  Michael J Rose; Kelly Jarvis; Varun Chowdhary; Alex J Barker; Bradley D Allen; Joshua D Robinson; Michael Markl; Cynthia K Rigsby; Susanne Schnell
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Use of a 1.0 Tesla open scanner for evaluation of pediatric and congenital heart disease: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jimmy C Lu; James C Nielsen; Layne Morowitz; Muzammil Musani; Maryam Ghadimi Mahani; Prachi P Agarwal; El-Sayed H Ibrahim; Adam L Dorfman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Aortic valve stenotic area calculation from phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance: the importance of short echo time.

Authors:  Kieran R O'Brien; Ruvin S Gabriel; Andreas Greiser; Brett R Cowan; Alistair A Young; Andrew J Kerr
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 5.364

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.