Literature DB >> 15456678

Change in breast self-examination behavior: effects of intervention on enhancing self-efficacy.

Aleksandra Luszczynska1.   

Abstract

This study evaluated a breast self-examination intervention to increase phase-specific self-efficacy and positive outcome expectancies. The role of social cognitive predictors in the process of behavior change was investigated. Using cluster randomization, participants were assigned to an intervention (n = 244) or to a control (n = 173) group. Controls were measured twice, with 13 weeks between the assessments. Respondents from the intervention group received the intervention before the 1st measurement. The increase in the number of self-examination components was significantly higher in the intervention group than among controls. Women who had never performed self-examinations before the intervention, as well as those who did it irregularly or incompletely, changed their behavior significantly. Results of structural equation modeling for a 2-group model showed that phase-specific self-efficacy was a significant predictor of intention, planning, and behavior change in the intervention group. In the control group, these relations were weaker or remained nonsignificant. Social cognitive variables measured in this study explained 15% of variance of behavior change in the control group and 29% of breast self-examination change in the intervention group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15456678     DOI: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1102_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Behav Med        ISSN: 1070-5503


  19 in total

1.  Breast health educational interventions. Changes in beliefs and practices of working women.

Authors:  Barbara Thomas; Lynnette Leeseberg Stamler; Kathryn D Lafreniere; Tabitha D Delahunt
Journal:  AAOHN J       Date:  2002-10

2.  The effect of an educational intervention on promoting breast self-examination in older African American and Caucasian women.

Authors:  Robin Y Wood; Mary E Duffy; Selma J Morris; Jennifer E Carnes
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Debbie Saslow; Kimberly Andrews Sawyer; Wylie Burke; Mary E Costanza; W Phil Evans; Roger S Foster; Edward Hendrick; Harmon J Eyre; Steven Sener
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Improving breast cancer control among Latinas: evaluation of a theory-based educational program.

Authors:  S I Mishra; L R Chavez; J R Magaña; P Nava; R Burciaga Valdez; F A Hubbell
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  1998-10

5.  The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior.

Authors:  B E Meyerowitz; S Chaiken
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-03

6.  Effects of components of protection-motivation theory on adaptive and maladaptive coping with a health threat.

Authors:  P A Rippetoe; R W Rogers
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-03

7.  Younger women at increased risk for breast cancer: perceived risk, psychological well-being, and surveillance behavior.

Authors:  C Lerman; K Kash; M Stefanek
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1994

8.  Predictors of proficient technique and successful lesion detection in breast self-examination.

Authors:  S W Alagna; D M Reddy
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 9.  Breast cancer screening controversies.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2003 May-Jun

10.  Breast self-care practices in women with primary relatives with breast cancer.

Authors:  K I Chalmers; K A Luker
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.187

View more
  3 in total

1.  Modeling the intention to choose natural vaginal delivery: using reasoned action and social cognitive theories.

Authors:  Safieh Kanani; Hamid Allahverdipour; Mohammad AsghariJafarabadi
Journal:  Health Promot Perspect       Date:  2015-03-29

2.  Barriers and Facilitators to Improve Fruit and Vegetable Intake Among WIC-Eligible Pregnant Latinas: An Application of the Health Action Process Approach Framework.

Authors:  Amber Hromi-Fiedler; Donna Chapman; Sofia Segura-Pérez; Grace Damio; Pamela Clark; Josefa Martinez; Rafael Pérez-Escamilla
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.045

3.  Understanding the Underlying Psychosocial Determinants of Safe Food Handling among Consumers to Mitigate the Transmission Risk of Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria.

Authors:  Claudia Freivogel; Vivianne H M Visschers
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.