Literature DB >> 12755251

Breast cancer screening controversies.

Beverly B Green1, Stephen H Taplin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Cochrane Collaborative, a respected independent review body, recently published a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of screening mammography in decreasing breast cancer mortality. Based on the results of two controlled trials they judged to be of medium validity, they concluded that screening mammography was unjustified. In contrast, the US Preventive Services Task Force recently updated their screening recommendations, and based on a meta-analysis of the same randomized controlled trials, they recommended screening mammography for all women starting at age 40 years. Additionally the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care no longer recommends breast self-examination (BSE). This article reviews the controversies regarding breast cancer screening.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature using keywords and cross-referencing articles. We also used automated data from the Breast Cancer Screening Program at Group Health Cooperative to determine the sensitivity of the clinical breast examination (CBE) at our institution. For the latter we included all cancers diagnosed within 1 year of a screening examination and then determined which of those had been found by CBE.
RESULTS: Although most screening studies have shown that mammography decreases breast cancer death, there are controversies about the validity of some of the randomized controlled screening mammography trials. These controversies have led to different conclusions about the efficacy of screening mammography. Evidence is limited about the optimal interval for screening mammography. No studies have directly tested the efficacy of the CBE in decreasing breast cancer mortality. At Group Health Cooperative, 8% of all diagnosed breast cancers were found by the CBE alone (negative mammogram). Whether this 8% incremental increase in case finding leads to decreased breast cancer deaths is unknown. There is good evidence that training women to perform BSE does not increase breast cancer diagnoses or decrease breast cancer deaths.
CONCLUSION: There are limitations to randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. The balance of the evidence still favors screening mammography in women aged 40 years and older at least every 2 years. The independent incremental benefit of the CBE, when added to mammography, in decreasing breast cancer mortality is unknown. Population-based education and training to do BSE are unlikely to lead to decreased breast cancer deaths. Many women find their own breast cancers, so women need to pay attention to symptoms or changes in their breasts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12755251     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.16.3.233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract        ISSN: 0893-8652


  17 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of clinical breast assessment-based screening in rural Egypt.

Authors:  Adel Denewer; Osama Hussein; Omar Farouk; Waleed Elnahas; Ashraf Khater; Aiman El-Saed
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  [The periodic health examination: a comparison of United States and Canadian recommendations].

Authors:  Cléo Mavriplis; Guylène Thériault
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  College students' knowledge of risk and screening recommendations for breast, cervical, and testicular cancers.

Authors:  Christine Makosky Daley
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Were our estimates of overdiagnosis with mammography screening in the United States "based on faulty science"?

Authors:  Archie Bleyer
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-02

Review 5.  Hierarchy of breast cancer cells: key to reverse dormancy for therapeutic intervention.

Authors:  Sarah A Bliss; Steven J Greco; Pranela Rameshwar
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 6.940

6.  Cost-effectiveness of mammography from a publicly funded health care system perspective.

Authors:  Nicole Mittmann; Natasha K Stout; Anna N A Tosteson; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Oguzhan Alagoz; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-02-08

7.  Why do breast cancer patients report late or abscond during treatment in ghana? A pilot study.

Authors:  J Clegg-Lamptey; J Dakubo; Y N Attobra
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2009-09

8.  Factors influencing serum concentration of CA125 and CA15-3 in Iranian healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Alamtaj Samsami Dehaghani; Alireza Fotouhi Ghiam; Marjan Hosseini; Sareh Mansouri; Abbas Ghaderi
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2007-12-25       Impact factor: 3.201

9.  Change in breast self-examination behavior: effects of intervention on enhancing self-efficacy.

Authors:  Aleksandra Luszczynska
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2004

10.  99mTc-thymine scintigraphy may be a promising method in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Monica Pires Ribeiro; Sergio Augusto Lopes de Souza; Flavia Paiva Proença Lobo Lopes; Paulo Henrique Rosado-de-Castro; Lea Mirian Barbosa da Fonseca; Bianca Gutfilen
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.