Literature DB >> 15456386

The validity of the five-factor model prototypes for personality disorders in two clinical samples.

Joshua D Miller1, Sarah K Reynolds, Paul A Pilkonis.   

Abstract

The authors examined the validity of D. R. Lynam and T. A. Widiger's (2001) prototypes for personality disorders (PDs) derived from the facets of the 5-factor model (FFM) of personality in 2 clinical samples. In the 1st sample (N = 94), there was good agreement between the prototypes generated by experts and the profiles reported by patients. These FFM PD similarity scores also demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity with results from a semistructured interview and a self-report measure of Axis II pathology. In the 2nd sample (N = 132), the FFM PD similarity scores demonstrated excellent longitudinal stability and good predictive validity with regard to consensus ratings of PD features. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15456386     DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.3.310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  10 in total

1.  Exploring personality - personality disorder relations and their implications for DSM-5.

Authors:  Joshua D Miller
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  Can DSM-IV borderline personality disorder be diagnosed via dimensional personality traits? Implications for the DSM-5 personality disorder proposal.

Authors:  Joshua D Miller; Jennifer Q Morse; Kimberly Nolf; Stephanie D Stepp; Paul A Pilkonis
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2012-03-19

3.  Five-factor model personality disorder prototypes in a community sample: self- and informant-reports predicting interview-based DSM diagnoses.

Authors:  Erin M Lawton; Andrew J Shields; Thomas F Oltmanns
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2011-10

Review 4.  Continuity of axes I and II: toward a unified model of personality, personality disorders, and clinical disorders.

Authors:  Robert F Krueger
Journal:  J Pers Disord       Date:  2005-06

5.  Incremental validity of positive and negative valence in predicting personality disorder.

Authors:  Leonard J Simms; Tom Yufik; Daniel F Gros
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2010-04

6.  Using clinician-rated five-factor model data to score the DSM-IV personality disorders.

Authors:  Joshua D Miller; Jessica Maples; Lauren R Few; Jennifer Q Morse; Kirsten E Yaggi; Paul A Pilkonis
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2010-07

7.  Five factor model prototype matching scores: convergence within alternative methods.

Authors:  Douglas B Samuel; Maryanne Edmundson; Thomas A Widiger
Journal:  J Pers Disord       Date:  2011-10

8.  The impact of NEO PI-R gender norms on the assessment of personality disorder profiles.

Authors:  Douglas B Samuel; Emily B Ansell; Christopher J Hopwood; Leslie C Morey; John C Markowitz; Andrew E Skodol; Carlos M Grilo
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2010-09

9.  Examining the reliability and validity of clinician ratings on the Five-Factor Model Score Sheet.

Authors:  Lauren R Few; Joshua D Miller; Jennifer Q Morse; Kirsten E Yaggi; Sarah K Reynolds; Paul A Pilkonis
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2010-06-02

10.  Dynamic associations between borderline personality disorder and stressful life events over five years in older adults.

Authors:  Christopher C Conway; Michael Boudreaux; Thomas F Oltmanns
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2018-02-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.