Literature DB >> 15454348

The individual within the group: balancing the need to belong with the need to be different.

Matthew J Hornsey1, Jolanda Jetten.   

Abstract

Many theorists have wrestled with the notion of how people balance their need to be included in social groups with their need to be different and distinctive. This question is particularly salient to researchers from the social identity perspective, who have traditionally viewed individual differentiation within groups as being inimical to group identification. In this article we present a number of strategies that people can use to balance their need to belong and their need to be different, without violating social identity principles. First, drawing from optimal distinctiveness theory, we discuss 4 ways in which the need for belonging and the need to be different can be resolved by maximizing group distinctiveness. We then discuss 4 ways in which it is possible to achieve individual differentiation within a group at the same time demonstrating group identification. These strategies are discussed and integrated with reference to recent empirical research and to the social identity perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15454348     DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev        ISSN: 1532-7957


  14 in total

1.  Characterizing drug non-users as distinctive in prevention messages: implications of optimal distinctiveness theory.

Authors:  Maria Leonora G Comello
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2011-06

2.  Individualization as driving force of clustering phenomena in humans.

Authors:  Michael Mäs; Andreas Flache; Dirk Helbing
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Genetically influenced externalizing and internalizing risk pathways as novel prevention targets.

Authors:  Danielle M Dick; Trisha Saunders; Emily Balcke; Morgan N Driver; Zoe Neale; Jasmin Vassileva; Joshua M Langberg
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2021-06-10

4.  Striving for group agency: threat to personal control increases the attractiveness of agentic groups.

Authors:  Janine Stollberg; Immo Fritsche; Anna Bäcker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-27

5.  Emotional reactions to deviance in groups: the relation between number of angry reactions, felt rejection, and conformity.

Authors:  Marc W Heerdink; Gerben A van Kleef; Astrid C Homan; Agneta H Fischer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-15

6.  Social conformity despite individual preferences for distinctiveness.

Authors:  Paul E Smaldino; Joshua M Epstein
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Brandon K N Sze; Matthew Andreotta
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  The usual suspects: How psychological motives and thinking styles predict the endorsement of well-known and COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs.

Authors:  Vukašin Gligorić; Margarida Moreira da Silva; Selin Eker; Nieke van Hoek; Ella Nieuwenhuijzen; Uljana Popova; Golnar Zeighami
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2021-05-26

9.  The Self-Regulation of Conformity: Mental Contrasting With Implementation Intentions (MCII).

Authors:  Vivica von Weichs; Nora Rebekka Krott; Gabriele Oettingen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-02

10.  Discrepancy and Disliking Do Not Induce Negative Opinion Shifts.

Authors:  Károly Takács; Andreas Flache; Michael Mäs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.