Literature DB >> 154543

Electrocardiographic poor R wave progression. I: correlation with the Frank vectorcardiogram.

M J Zema, P Kligfield.   

Abstract

Fifty-six patients with "poor R wave progression" (PRWP) on the electrocardiogram (ECG) were studied by Frank vectorcardiography in an attempt to define discriminators for subgroups. Criteria were prospectively applied to a test group with achievement of comparable sensitivity and specificity. Four subgroups were identified in the patients with PRWP: Group I - anterior myocardial infarction (AMI) (20/56, 35%); Group II - left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (8/56, 14%); Group III - right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) (7/56, 13%); AND Group IV - leftward axis (LA) (21/56, 38%). The best discriminator for vectorcardiogram (VCG) AMI was RV3 less than or equal to 1.5mm or R1 less than or equal to 4.0mm (18/20, 90% sensitivity; 26/36, 72% specificity). RVH and LVH were identified by R1 less than or equal to 4.0mm and S1 greater than or equal to 1.0mm and standard LVH voltage criteria respectively. Group IV patients (PRWP without VCG criteria for AMI, LVH or RVH) were identified by exclusion. "Reversed R wave progression" (RRWP) was more specific for AMI than was simple PRWP. The same discriminators, however, were applicable. It is clinically useful to note that 72% (26/36) of patients with either PRWP or RRWP who did not exhibit VCG AMI could be identified by 12 lead ECG with only 2/28 (7%) VCG false negative AMI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 154543     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0736(79)80038-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  7 in total

1.  Complete absence of precordial R waves due to absence of left-sided pericardium.

Authors:  Christian Steinberg; Marie-Josée Pelletier; Jean Champagne
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Effects of mechanical ventilation on the electrocardiogram in adults.

Authors:  Jason Elinoff; Daniel Talmor; Balachundhar Subramaniam; Dimitrios Karmpaliotis; Ary L Goldberger; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.584

3.  Clinical disease presentation and ECG characteristics of LMNA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Laura Ollila; Kjell Nikus; Miia Holmström; Mikko Jalanko; Raija Jurkko; Maija Kaartinen; Juha Koskenvuo; Johanna Kuusisto; Satu Kärkkäinen; Eeva Palojoki; Eeva Reissell; Päivi Piirilä; Tiina Heliö
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2017-01-09

4.  Poor R-wave progression and myocardial infarct size after anterior myocardial infarction in the coronary intervention era.

Authors:  Satoshi Kurisu; Toshitaka Iwasaki; Noriaki Watanabe; Hiroki Ikenaga; Takashi Shimonaga; Tadanao Higaki; Ken Ishibashi; Yoshihiro Dohi; Yukihiro Fukuda; Yasuki Kihara
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2015-03-24

5.  Clinical significance of reversed R wave progression in right precordial leads.

Authors:  Hiroki Isono; Shigeyuki Watanabe; Chieko Sumiya; Masahiro Toyama; Eiji Ojima; Shunsuke Maruta; Yuta Oishi; Junya Honda; Yasuhisa Kuroda
Journal:  J Rural Med       Date:  2019-05-30

6.  Prevalence and positive predictive value of poor R-wave progression and impact of the cardiothoracic ratio.

Authors:  Sung-Hwan Kim; Mi Hyang Kwak; Hak Jin Kim; Gi-Byoung Nam; Kee-Joon Choi; You-Ho Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.243

7.  Simulation Methods and Validation Criteria for Modeling Cardiac Ventricular Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Shankarjee Krishnamoorthi; Luigi E Perotti; Nils P Borgstrom; Olujimi A Ajijola; Anna Frid; Aditya V Ponnaluri; James N Weiss; Zhilin Qu; William S Klug; Daniel B Ennis; Alan Garfinkel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.