Literature DB >> 15453834

Modulation of scar tissue formation using different dermal regeneration templates in the treatment of experimental full-thickness wounds.

Daniel Druecke1, Evert N Lamme, Sonja Hermann, Jeroen Pieper, Paul S May, Hans-Ulrich Steinau, Lars Steinstraesser.   

Abstract

The recovery of skin function is the goal of each burn surgeon. Split-skin graft treatment of full-thickness skin defects leads to scar formation, which is often vulnerable and instable. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze wound healing and scar tissue formation in acute full-thickness wounds treated with clinically available biopolymer dermal regeneration templates. Full-thickness wounds (3 x 3 cm) on both flanks of Gottingen mini pigs (n= 3) were treated with split-thickness skin graft alone or in combination with a 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide (EDC) cross-linked-collagen scaffold, Integra, or a polyethyleneglycol terephthalate-polybutylene terephthalate (PEGT/PBT) scaffold. The wounds (n= 12 per group) were examined weekly for six weeks to evaluate graft take, contraction (planimetry), and cosmetic appearance. Histologic samples taken after one and six weeks were used to assess scaffold angiogenesis, biocompatibility, and scar tissue quality. In all wounds, one week postwounding graft take was between 93 and 100 percent. The control wound, treated with split-skin graft, showed little granulation tissue formation, whereas the EDC-collagen treated wounds showed two to three times more granulation tissue formation. The collagen scaffold was completely degraded within one week. The Integra and PEGT/PBT scaffolds showed angiogenesis only through two-thirds of the scaffold, which resulted in loss of integrity of the epidermis. Only basal cells survived, proliferated, and regenerated a fully differentiated epidermis within three weeks. Granulation thickness was comparable to collagen scaffold-treated wounds. After six weeks, control wounds showed a wound contraction of 27.2 +/- 6.1 percent, Integra-treated wounds 34.6 +/- 6.4 percent, collagen scaffold-treated wounds 38.1 +/- 5.0 percent, and PEGT/PBT scaffold-treated wounds 54.5 +/- 3.9 percent. The latter wounds had significantly more contraction than wounds of other treatment groups. Microscopically, the control and collagen scaffold-treated wounds showed an immature scar tissue that was two times thicker in the EDC-collagen treated wounds. The Integra-treated wounds showed nondegraded collagen scaffold fibers with partly de novo dermal tissue formation and partly areas with giant cells and other inflammatory cells. The PEGT/PBT scaffold was almost completely degraded. Scaffold particles were phagocytosized and degraded intracellularly by clusters of macrophages. The scar tissue was in the early phase of ECM remodeling. In conclusion, this study showed that the rate of dermal tissue formation and scarring is influenced by the rate of scaffold angiogenesis, degradation, and host response induced by the scaffold materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15453834     DOI: 10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.012504.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  14 in total

1.  Association of increasing burn severity in mice with delayed mobilization of circulating angiogenic cells.

Authors:  Xianjie Zhang; Xiaofei Wei; Lixin Liu; Guy P Marti; Mohammed S Ghanamah; Muhammad J Arshad; Lori Strom; Robert Spence; James Jeng; Stephen Milner; John W Harmon; Gregg L Semenza
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-03

2.  Novel cryoprecipitate for wound healing and skin grafts in rats.

Authors:  Thomas Scholz; Joshua Waltzman; Garrett A Wirth; Senait W Dyson; William J Owens; Edward Shanbrom; Gregory R D Evans
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Tailoring the degradation rates of thermally responsive hydrogels designed for soft tissue injection by varying the autocatalytic potential.

Authors:  Yang Zhu; Hongbin Jiang; Sang-Ho Ye; Tomo Yoshizumi; William R Wagner
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Functional skeletal muscle formation with a biologic scaffold.

Authors:  Jolene E Valentin; Neill J Turner; Thomas W Gilbert; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Real-time analysis of the kinetics of angiogenesis and vascular permeability in an animal model of wound healing.

Authors:  Ashkaun Shaterian; Alexandra Borboa; Ritsuko Sawada; Todd Costantini; Bruce Potenza; Raul Coimbra; Andrew Baird; Brian P Eliceiri
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 2.744

6.  A novel lignin-based nanofibrous dressing containing arginine for wound-healing applications.

Authors:  Fatemeh Reesi; Mohsen Minaiyan; Azade Taheri
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.617

7.  Enhanced wound healing via collagen-turnover-driven transfer of PDGF-BB gene in a murine wound model.

Authors:  Raj Kumar Thapa; David J Margolis; Kristi L Kiick; Millicent O Sullivan
Journal:  ACS Appl Bio Mater       Date:  2020-05-04

Review 8.  Skin cancers and dermal substitutes: Is it safe? Review of the literature and presentation of a 2-stage surgical protocol for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers of the head in fragile patients.

Authors:  Marco Marcasciano; Marco Mazzocchi; Juste Kaciulyte; Noemi Spissu; Donato Casella; Diego Ribuffo; Luca Andrea Dessy
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Designer self-assembling hydrogel scaffolds can impact skin cell proliferation and migration.

Authors:  Michael Bradshaw; Diwei Ho; Mark W Fear; Fabrizio Gelain; Fiona M Wood; K Swaminathan Iyer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Evaluation of human amniotic membrane as a wound dressing for split-thickness skin-graft donor sites.

Authors:  Denys J Loeffelbein; Nils H Rohleder; Matthias Eddicks; Claudia M Baumann; Mechthild Stoeckelhuber; Klaus-D Wolff; Enken Drecoll; Lars Steinstraesser; Simone Hennerbichler; Marco R Kesting
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.