OBJECTIVE: To describe a protocol for use in young children and adolescents for determining language representation. METHODS: We performed 130 fMRI studies in 48 children and 17 adults. Verb generation (VG) and orthographic lexical retrieval (OLR) were used. The localization and lateralization of activation was rated visually. Regional voxel counts measured asymmetry and extent of activation. RESULTS: Activation was predominantly left-lateralized (children 85%, adults 94%), and there was no difference in the localization of activation for either paradigm. Children's typical sites of activation included mesial (96%), inferior (94%) and middle frontal (92%) gyri, the inferior (85%) and superior (65%) temporal cortex, and the cerebellum (67%). Less frequently activated sites were insular (50%) and posterior parietal (48%) cortices. Quantitative asymmetry index scores and visual inspection of laterality were concordant. Greater quantitative asymmetry for VG than OLR occurred in children. Laterality was not related to age, sex, task proficiency, or handedness. Frontal region voxel counts lower in children than adults and left sided counts correlated with task proficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Language fMRI can be performed in young children using resources available to clinical centers. The similarity in frequency of left language lateralization between children and adults suggests that language representation establishes early in development. The reduced amount of frontal region of interest activation in task-specific regions in children may reflect different levels of ability. However, the left-right distribution of activation does not appear to depend on task performance or age. These normative data provide a basis for decisions about language laterality in pediatric patients.
OBJECTIVE: To describe a protocol for use in young children and adolescents for determining language representation. METHODS: We performed 130 fMRI studies in 48 children and 17 adults. Verb generation (VG) and orthographic lexical retrieval (OLR) were used. The localization and lateralization of activation was rated visually. Regional voxel counts measured asymmetry and extent of activation. RESULTS: Activation was predominantly left-lateralized (children 85%, adults 94%), and there was no difference in the localization of activation for either paradigm. Children's typical sites of activation included mesial (96%), inferior (94%) and middle frontal (92%) gyri, the inferior (85%) and superior (65%) temporal cortex, and the cerebellum (67%). Less frequently activated sites were insular (50%) and posterior parietal (48%) cortices. Quantitative asymmetry index scores and visual inspection of laterality were concordant. Greater quantitative asymmetry for VG than OLR occurred in children. Laterality was not related to age, sex, task proficiency, or handedness. Frontal region voxel counts lower in children than adults and left sided counts correlated with task proficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Language fMRI can be performed in young children using resources available to clinical centers. The similarity in frequency of left language lateralization between children and adults suggests that language representation establishes early in development. The reduced amount of frontal region of interest activation in task-specific regions in children may reflect different levels of ability. However, the left-right distribution of activation does not appear to depend on task performance or age. These normative data provide a basis for decisions about language laterality in pediatric patients.
Authors: Jerzy P Szaflarski; Vincent J Schmithorst; Mekibib Altaye; Anna W Byars; Jennifer Ret; Elena Plante; Scott K Holland Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Andrew Etchell; Aditi Adhikari; Lauren S Weinberg; Ai Leen Choo; Emily O Garnett; Ho Ming Chow; Soo-Eun Chang Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Madison M Berl; Jessica Mayo; Erin N Parks; Lisa R Rosenberger; John VanMeter; Nan Bernstein Ratner; Chandan J Vaidya; William Davis Gaillard Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Tracey A Knaus; Andrew M Silver; Kristen A Lindgren; Nouchine Hadjikhani; Helen Tager-Flusberg Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Scott K Holland; Jennifer Vannest; Marc Mecoli; Lisa M Jacola; Jan-Mendelt Tillema; Prasanna R Karunanayaka; Vincent J Schmithorst; Weihong Yuan; Elena Plante; Anna W Byars Journal: Int J Audiol Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 2.117
Authors: Maureen Dennis; Derryn Jewell; Ross Hetherington; Christine Burton; Michael E Brandt; Susan E Blaser; Jack M Fletcher Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.892