PURPOSE:Epoetin alfa administered at 40,000 U once weekly (qw) to anemic cancer patients receivingchemotherapy increases hemoglobin levels, improves quality of life (QOL), and reduces transfusions. The benefit of epoetin alfa in maintaining hemoglobin levels in cancer patients with hemoglobin less than 12 g/dL has not been evaluated. METHODS:Breast cancer patients (N = 354) receivingchemotherapy were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to epoetin alfa (40,000 U qw) or standard of care (SOC). QOL was assessed at baseline and week 12. Hemoglobin responses, transfusion requirements, and prognostic factors for responses were measured. RESULTS: At week 12, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An; mean, 2.16 +/- 12.84 for epoetin alfa v -4.43 +/- 13.42 for SOC) and FACT-An fatigue (mean, 1.85 +/- 10.52 for epoetin alfa v -3.55 +/- 11.14 for SOC) change scores were significantly higher in the epoetin alfa group (P < .0001). Hemoglobin responses defined as mean hemoglobin > or = 12 g/dL or a > or = 2 g/dL increase compared with baseline were significantly higher in the epoetin alfa group versus SOC: 52.0% v 5.1% and 65.7% v 6.3%, respectively (P < .0001 for both comparisons). Percentage transfused was significantly lower in the epoetin alfa group compared with SOC (8.6% v 22.9%). More than 90% of patients did not require a dose increase and 28.7% had a dose reduction. CONCLUSION:Epoetin alfa administered at 40,000 U qw is effective in improving QOL, maintaining hemoglobin level, and reducing transfusion requirements in breast cancer patients. The high effectiveness observed could be attributed in part to early treatment with epoetin alfa.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Epoetin alfa administered at 40,000 U once weekly (qw) to anemic cancerpatients receiving chemotherapy increases hemoglobin levels, improves quality of life (QOL), and reduces transfusions. The benefit of epoetin alfa in maintaining hemoglobin levels in cancerpatients with hemoglobin less than 12 g/dL has not been evaluated. METHODS:Breast cancerpatients (N = 354) receiving chemotherapy were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to epoetin alfa (40,000 U qw) or standard of care (SOC). QOL was assessed at baseline and week 12. Hemoglobin responses, transfusion requirements, and prognostic factors for responses were measured. RESULTS: At week 12, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An; mean, 2.16 +/- 12.84 for epoetin alfa v -4.43 +/- 13.42 for SOC) and FACT-An fatigue (mean, 1.85 +/- 10.52 for epoetin alfa v -3.55 +/- 11.14 for SOC) change scores were significantly higher in the epoetin alfa group (P < .0001). Hemoglobin responses defined as mean hemoglobin > or = 12 g/dL or a > or = 2 g/dL increase compared with baseline were significantly higher in the epoetin alfa group versus SOC: 52.0% v 5.1% and 65.7% v 6.3%, respectively (P < .0001 for both comparisons). Percentage transfused was significantly lower in the epoetin alfa group compared with SOC (8.6% v 22.9%). More than 90% of patients did not require a dose increase and 28.7% had a dose reduction. CONCLUSION:Epoetin alfa administered at 40,000 U qw is effective in improving QOL, maintaining hemoglobin level, and reducing transfusion requirements in breast cancerpatients. The high effectiveness observed could be attributed in part to early treatment with epoetin alfa.
Authors: Heinz Ludwig; Thomas Auberger; Otto Ch Burghuber; Michael Gnant; Georg Hopfinger; Ulrich Jäger; Felix Keil; Gabriela Kornek; Werner Linkesch; Edgar Petru; Robert Pirker; Elisabeth Pittermann; Alexander Reinthaller; Hellmut Samonigg; Günther Steger; Felix Stockenhuber; Michael Studnicka; Günter Weiss; Christoph Zielinski Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2008 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Vicente Alberola Candel; Alfredo Carrato Mena; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio García; Pere Gascón Vilaplana; Manuel González Barón; Miguel Martín Jiménez; Emilio Alba Conejo; Javier Cassinello Espinosa; Ramon Colomer; Juan Jesús Cruz Hernández; Agustí Barnadas i Molins; Carlos Camps Herrero; Ana Ma Casas Fernández de Tejerina; Joan Carulla Torrent; Manuel Constenla Figueiras; Joaquin Gavilá Gregori; Ma Dolores Isla Casado; Bartomeu Massuti Sureda; Mariano Provencio Pulla; César Augusto Rodríguez Sánchez; Jaime Sanz Ortiz Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Philippe Fagnoni; Samuel Limat; Loïc Chaigneau; Emmanuel Guardiola; Stéphanie Briaud; Bernard Schmitt; Yacine Merrouche; Xavier Pivot; Marie-Christine Woronoff-Lemsi Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2006-06-27 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Tenbroeck Smith; Kristi Richardson; Corinne Crammer; Greta Greer; Kevin D Stein; C Christina Mehta; James L Kepner Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Bing Zhou; Jeffrey S Damrauer; Sean T Bailey; Tanja Hadzic; Youngtae Jeong; Kelly Clark; Cheng Fan; Laura Murphy; Cleo Y Lee; Melissa A Troester; C Ryan Miller; Jian Jin; David Darr; Charles M Perou; Ross L Levine; Maximilian Diehn; William Y Kim Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: François Lüthi; Miklos Pless; Serge Leyvraz; Beat Biedermann; Emilie Müller; Richard Hermann; Christian Monnerat Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: J Glaspy; J Crawford; J Vansteenkiste; D Henry; S Rao; P Bowers; J A Berlin; D Tomita; K Bridges; H Ludwig Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-01-05 Impact factor: 7.640