Literature DB >> 15451332

How regular is regular? An analysis of menstrual cycle regularity.

Mitchell D Creinin1, Sharon Keverline, Leslie A Meyn.   

Abstract

We performed a retrospective analysis to ascertain how accurately women who believe that they have regular menstrual cycles estimate the length of their actual cycles. Data were extracted from a chart review of subjects from three different studies of barrier contraceptives. Subjects were between 18 and 40 years of age and reported "regular" prestudy menstrual cycles with a consistent cycle length between 21 and 35 days. Participants prospectively recorded their menses for the up to 30 weeks. Each subject's estimated cycle length was compared to the average of her actual cycle lengths and the range and variability in each individual's cycle length was calculated. A total of 786 cycles from 130 women who recorded 4 or more cycles were analyzed. The averages of the participants' estimated cycle lengths was similar to the prospective averages of their actual cycle lengths (29.0 +/- 2.7 days vs. 29.1 +/- 3.5 days, respectively, p = 0.8). Forty-six percent of all subjects had a cycle range of 7 days or more, and 20% had a cycle range of 14 days or more. The average length of menses was 5.2 +/- 1.0 days. When evaluating only women with cycle lengths from 21 to 35 days, the average length of menses was positively associated with the average actual cycle length (p = 0.04). Although the average of a woman's menstrual cycles compares favorably to her impression of her cycle length, the variability in menstrual cycle lengths is significant. This variation may have clinical impact on contraceptive practice, contraceptive research studies and pregnancy-related care. Copyright 2004 Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15451332     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  37 in total

1.  Associations between psychiatric disorders and menstrual cycle characteristics.

Authors:  Mary Lee Barron; Louise H Flick; Cynthia A Cook; Sharon M Homan; Claudia Campbell
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nurs       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.218

2.  Characterizing physiological and symptomatic variation in menstrual cycles using self-tracked mobile-health data.

Authors:  Kathy Li; Iñigo Urteaga; Chris H Wiggins; Anna Druet; Amanda Shea; Virginia J Vitzthum; Noémie Elhadad
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-05-26

Review 3.  Biomaterials and Contraception: Promises and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Isabella Claure; Deborah Anderson; Catherine M Klapperich; Wendy Kuohung; Joyce Y Wong
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Impact of hypocaloric dietary intervention on ovulation in obese women with PCOS.

Authors:  Brittany Y Jarrett; Marla E Lujan
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Progesterone receptor modulator for emergency contraception: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mitchell D Creinin; William Schlaff; David F Archer; Livia Wan; Ron Frezieres; Michael Thomas; Michael Rosenberg; James Higgins
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Exercise training has greater effects on insulin sensitivity in daughters of patients with type 2 diabetes than in women with no family history of diabetes.

Authors:  N D Barwell; D Malkova; C N Moran; S J Cleland; C J Packard; V A Zammit; J M R Gill
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 7.  Determining menstrual phase in human biobehavioral research: A review with recommendations.

Authors:  Alicia M Allen; Aimee L McRae-Clark; Samantha Carlson; Michael E Saladin; Kevin M Gray; Cora Lee Wetherington; Sherry A McKee; Sharon S Allen
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Assessing the utility of methods for menopausal transition classification in a population-based cohort: the CARDIA Study.

Authors:  Hilary K Whitham; Richard F Maclehose; Bernard L Harlow; Melissa F Wellons; Pamela J Schreiner
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  A little bit pregnant: modeling how the accurate detection of pregnancy can improve HIV prevention trials.

Authors:  Courtney A Schreiber; Mary Sammel; Sharon L Hillier; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Accuracy of reporting of menstrual cycle length.

Authors:  Anne Marie Zaura Jukic; Clarice R Weinberg; Allen J Wilcox; D Robert McConnaughey; Paige Hornsby; Donna D Baird
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.