Literature DB >> 15450104

Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over the frontal eye field can facilitate and inhibit saccade triggering.

Thomas Nyffeler1, Oliver Bucher, Tobias Pflugshaupt, Roman Von Wartburg, Pascal Wurtz, Christian W Hess, René M Müri.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation on the triggering of saccades. The right frontal eye field was stimulated during modified gap and overlap paradigms with flashed presentation of the lateral visual target of 80 ms. In order to examine possible facilitating or inhibitory effects on saccade triggering, three different time intervals of stimulation were chosen, i.e. simultaneously with onset of the target, during the presentation and after target end. Stimulation applied simultaneously with target onset significantly decreased the latency of contralateral saccades in the gap but not in the overlap paradigm. Stimulation after target end significantly increased saccade latency for both sides in the gap paradigm and for the contralateral side in the overlap paradigm. Stimulation during presentation had no effect in either paradigm. The results show that, depending on the time interval and the paradigm tested, a facilitation or inhibition of saccade triggering can be achieved. The results are discussed in a context of two probable transcranial magnetic stimulation effects, a direct interference with the frontal eye field on the one hand and a remote interference with the superior colliculus on the other hand.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15450104     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03667.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  9 in total

1.  Exploring the contributions of the supplementary eye field to subliminal inhibition using double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Hui-Yan Chiau; Neil G Muggleton; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Enhanced facilitation of spatial attention in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Kevin M Spencer; Paul G Nestor; Olga Valdman; Margaret A Niznikiewicz; Martha E Shenton; Robert W McCarley
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  State and Trait Anxiety Share Common Network Topological Mechanisms of Human Brain.

Authors:  Yubin Li; Lili Jiang
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Distinct control of initiation and metrics of memory-guided saccades and vergence by the FEF: a TMS study.

Authors:  Qing Yang; Zoi Kapoula
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Distributed representations of the "preparatory set" in the frontal oculomotor system: a TMS study.

Authors:  M Nagel; A Sprenger; R Lencer; D Kömpf; H Siebner; W Heide
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.288

6.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation for diplopia in a patient with spinocerebellar ataxia type 6: a case report.

Authors:  Kentaro Kawamura; Seiji Etoh; Megumi Shimodozono
Journal:  Cerebellum Ataxias       Date:  2018-11-20

7.  Effect of maintaining neck flexion on anti-saccade reaction time: an investigation using transcranial magnetic stimulation to the frontal oculomotor field.

Authors:  Kenji Kunita; Katsuo Fujiwara
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.867

Review 8.  Frontal eye field, where art thou? Anatomy, function, and non-invasive manipulation of frontal regions involved in eye movements and associated cognitive operations.

Authors:  Marine Vernet; Romain Quentin; Lorena Chanes; Andres Mitsumasu; Antoni Valero-Cabré
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-22

9.  Ups and downs in catch-up saccades following single-pulse TMS-methodological considerations.

Authors:  James Mathew; Frederic R Danion
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.