Literature DB >> 15449817

Contraceptive use and behavior in the 21st century: a comprehensive study across five European countries.

S O Skouby1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The choice of currently available contraceptive methods has increased considerably in recent years, offering women of reproductive age a variety of different methods dependent on their needs and lifestyle. In order to determine the pattern of use of current methods in contraception, a survey was conducted in a large population of women drawn from five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom).
METHOD: More than 12,000 randomly selected women, aged 15-49 years, were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire which addressed the use of current methods of contraception. The responses were analyzed for the total study population, and, where appropriate, by country and age.
RESULTS: An oral contraceptive (OC) was confirmed as the most widely used method of contraception for women in the European study population, with an estimated 22 million users in the five countries. Women using an OC reported very high levels of satisfaction (>90%). Male and female sterilization were the main methods of contraception in women aged 40 years and older. One-half of the women had undergone their sterilization before the age of 35 years. More than 50% of the women who had undergone sterilization had not been adequately informed and counselled about alternative reversible contraceptive options. No method of contraception was being used currently by 23% of the European study population, and unreliable methods of contraception (including cap/diaphragm, chemical, and natural and withdrawal methods) were being used by a further 6% of the population. Although valid reasons (e.g. not in a sexual relationship, wish to become pregnant) were given by many women who were not using contraception, there still remains a large number of women who need counselling regarding the importance of using reliable contraceptive methods. The number of women aged 15-49 years in the five European countries who are considered at risk of an unwanted pregnancy is estimated to be 4.7 million (6.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in the use pattern of contraceptive methods were demonstrated that emphasize the social and cultural differences between the countries. The findings in the current study can be used as a baseline from which to monitor trends in contraceptive use and behavior in subsequent studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15449817     DOI: 10.1080/13625180410001715681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1362-5187            Impact factor:   1.848


  33 in total

1.  User satisfaction with the combined oral contraceptive drospirenone 3 mg/ethinylestradiol 20 microg (Yasminelle) in clinical practice: a multi-country, questionnaire-based study.

Authors:  Mary Short
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Similarities and differences in contraceptive use reported by women and men in the National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Abigail Ra Aiken; Yu Wang; Jenny Higgins; James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Attitudes, awareness, compliance and preferences among hormonal contraception users: a global, cross-sectional, self-administered, online survey.

Authors:  David J Hooper
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives.

Authors:  Melinda Mills; Ronald R Rindfuss; Peter McDonald; Egbert te Velde
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 15.610

5.  Sexual Health and Risk Behaviour among East Asian Adolescents in British Columbia.

Authors:  Yuko Homma; Elizabeth M Saewyc; Sabrina T Wong; Bruno D Zumbo
Journal:  Can J Hum Sex       Date:  2013-01-01

6.  Pre-gravid oral contraceptive use in relation to birth weight: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Hatch; Kristen A Hahn; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Anders H Riis; Henrik Toft Sorensen; Kenneth J Rothman; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Trends in inequalities in induced abortion according to educational level among urban women.

Authors:  Gloria Pérez; Irene García-Subirats; Maica Rodríguez-Sanz; Elia Díez; Carme Borrell
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 3.671

8.  Pre-gravid oral contraceptive use and time to pregnancy: a Danish prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ellen M Mikkelsen; Anders H Riis; Lauren A Wise; Elizabeth E Hatch; Kenneth J Rothman; Henrik Toft Sørensen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Socioeconomic inequalities in unintended pregnancy and abortion decision.

Authors:  Laia Font-Ribera; Glòria Pérez; Joaquín Salvador; Carme Borrell
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 3.671

10.  Altered pharmacokinetics of combined oral contraceptives in obesity - multistudy assessment.

Authors:  Dandan Luo; Carolyn L Westhoff; Alison B Edelman; Melissa Natavio; Frank Z Stanczyk; William J Jusko
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.