Literature DB >> 15449012

Phase- and size-adjusted CT cut-off for differentiating neoplastic lesions from normal colon in contrast-enhanced CT colonography.

W Luboldt1, M Kroll, A Wetter, T L Toussaint, N Hoepffner, K Holzer, A Kluge, T J Vogl.   

Abstract

A computed tomography (CT) cut-off for differentiating neoplastic lesions (polyps/carcinoma) from normal colon in contrast-enhanced CT colonography (CTC) relating to the contrast phase and lesion size is determined. CT values of 64 colonic lesions (27 polyps <10 mm, 13 polyps > or =10 mm, 24 carcinomas) were determined by region-of-interest (ROI) measurements in 38 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CTC. In addition, the height (H) of the colonic lesions was measured in CT. CT values were also measured in the aorta (A), superior mesenteric vein (V) and colonic wall. The contrast phase was defined by xA + (1-x)V using x as a weighting factor for describing the different contrast phases ranging from the pure arterial phase (x=1) over the intermediate phases (x=0.9-0.1) to the pure venous phase (x=0). The CT values of the lesions were correlated with their height (H), the different phases (xA+(1-x)V) and the ratio [xA+(I-x)V]/H. The CT cut-off was linearly adjusted to the imaged contrast phase and height of the lesion by the line y=m[xA+(1-x)V]H+y(0). The slope m was determined by linear regression in the correlation (lesion approximately [xA+(i-x)V]/H) and the Y-intercept y(0) by the minimal shift of the line needed to maximize the accuracy of separating the colonic wall from the lesions. The CT value of the lesions correlated best with the intermediate phase: 0.4A + 0.6V (r=0.8 for polyps > or =10 mm, r=0.6 for carcinomas, r=0.4 for polyps <10 mm). The accuracy in the differentiation between lesions and normal colonic wall increased with the height implemented as divisor, reached 91% and was obtained by the dynamic cut-off described by the formula: cut-off (A,V,H)=1.1 [0.4A+0.6V]/H+69.8. The CT value of colonic polyps or carcinomas can be increased extrinsically by scanning in the phase in which 0.4A + 0.6V reaches its maximum. Differentiating lesions from normal colon based on CT values is possible in contrast-enhanced CTC and improves when the cut-off is adjusted (normalized) to the contrast phase and lesion size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15449012     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2467-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  26 in total

Review 1.  Delayed allergy-like reactions to X-ray contrast media: mechanistic considerations.

Authors:  C Christiansen; W J Pichler; T Skotland
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media.

Authors:  S K Morcos; H S Thomsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Early detection of colorectal tumors: CT or MRI?].

Authors:  W Luboldt; N Hoepffner; K Holzer; V Jacobi; K Willenbrock; G Woeste; W O Bechstein; T J Vogl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Automated mass detection in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast and volume.

Authors:  W Luboldt; C Tryon; M Kroll; T L Toussaint; K Holzer; N Hoepffner; T J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  The optimal dose of nicardipine for enhancement of indirect portography.

Authors:  Y Inoue; H Nakamura; H Akaji
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Worldwide clinical safety assessment of gadoteridol injection: an update.

Authors:  V M Runge; J R Parker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Computer-aided diagnosis in virtual colonography via combination of surface normal and sphere fitting methods.

Authors:  Gabriel Kiss; Johan Van Cleynenbreugel; Maarten Thomeer; Paul Suetens; Guy Marchal
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-07-12       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  A morphometric study of neovascularization in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  P M Pavlopoulos; A E Konstantinidou; E Agapitos; N Kavantzas; P Nikolopoulou; P Davaris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Assessment of small bowel Crohn disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy--feasibility study.

Authors:  Peter B Wold; Joel G Fletcher; C Daniel Johnson; William J Sandborn
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Angiogenesis in colorectal tumors: microvessel quantitation in adenomas and carcinomas with clinicopathological correlations.

Authors:  P Bossi; G Viale; A K Lee; R Alfano; G Coggi; S Bosari
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  5 in total

1.  Automated mass detection in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast and volume.

Authors:  W Luboldt; C Tryon; M Kroll; T L Toussaint; K Holzer; N Hoepffner; T J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The diagnostic value of multiplanar reconstruction on MDCT colonography for the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kwang Nam Jin; Jeong Min Lee; Se Hyung Kim; Kyung-Sook Shin; Jae Young Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps.

Authors:  Markus S Juchems; Thorsten R Fleiter; Sandra Pauls; Stefan A Schmidt; Hans-Jürgen Brambs; Andrik J Aschoff
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Importance of extracolonic findings at IV contrast medium-enhanced CT colonography versus those at non-enhanced CT colonography.

Authors:  Adrian Spreng; Peter Netzer; Joerg Mattich; Hans-Peter Dinkel; Peter Vock; Hanno Hoppe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Texture Feature Extraction and Analysis for Polyp Differentiation via Computed Tomography Colonography.

Authors:  Yifan Hu; Zhengrong Liang; Bowen Song; Hao Han; Perry J Pickhardt; Wei Zhu; Chaijie Duan; Hao Zhang; Matthew A Barish; Chris E Lascarides
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 10.048

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.