Literature DB >> 15448886

Knee arthroplasty for spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee: unicompartimental vs bicompartimental knee arthroplasty.

S Radke1, N Wollmerstedt, A Bischoff, J Eulert.   

Abstract

Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SON) is an osteonecrosis that mainly affects the medial femoral condyle. In endstage SON, knee arthroplasty is the therapy of choice. Because of the unicompartimental nature of the knee, unicondylar knee arthroplasty is considered an ideal implant for treatment of this condition. The purpose of this study was to prove that the long-term results of unicondylar implants are better than the results of bicondylar implants for the treatment of SON. All patients treated for SON between 1984 and 2000 have been recorded. Two groups were formed according to the implant used. In all patients the preoperative radiograph was analyzed according to stage and size of the osteonecrotic lesion and the osteoarthritic changes. Postoperatively, the Knee Society Score and the radiograph were recorded. Thirty-nine patients were included in this study, of which 23 patients were treated by a unicondylar implant and 16 by a bicondylar implant. On a short-term basis, unicondylar implants had better clinical results; however, on a long-term basis bicondylar implants were better. In comparison, only unicondylar implants had to be revised. Radiolucency lines were mainly observed in patients with unicondylar impants and large areas of osteonecrosis. Our long-term results suggest that patients with SON are better treated by bicondylar implants. The reasons for the higher failure rate for unicondylar implants are poor bone stock and secondary arthritic changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15448886     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-004-0551-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  28 in total

1.  Orthopaedic crossfire--can we justify unicondylar arthroplasty as a temporizing procedure? in the affirmative.

Authors:  Gerard A Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The survival of total knee arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the medial condyle.

Authors:  M A Ritter; L E Eizember; E M Keating; P M Faris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Unicompartmental prosthesis for gonarthrosis. A nine-year series of 575 knees from a Swedish hospital.

Authors:  N O Christensen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle].

Authors:  C J Wirth; C Stukenborg-Colsman; A Wefer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee.

Authors:  P M Rozing; J Insall; W H Bohne
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Idiopathic osteonecrosis of the medial femoral condyle. Classification and treatment.

Authors:  P N Soucacos; T H Xenakis; A E Beris; P K Soucacos; A Georgoulis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using polycentric and geometric hemicomponents.

Authors:  W T Jones; R S Bryan; L F Peterson; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The treatment of osteonecrosis of the medial femoral condyle.

Authors:  P A Lotke; J A Abend; M L Ecker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. An evaluation of selection criteria.

Authors:  S H Stern; M W Becker; J N Insall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Orthopaedic crossfire--can we justify unicondylar arthroplasty as a temporizing procedure? in opposition.

Authors:  Thomas P Sculco
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  7 in total

1.  Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee.

Authors:  Won-Sik Choy; Kap Jung Kim; Sang Ki Lee; Dae Suk Yang; Choon Myeon Kim; Ju Sang Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-12-01

2.  Is unicompartmental arthroplasty an acceptable option for spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee?

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Francesco Iacono; Giovanni Raspugli; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Femoral osteonecrosis - Ahlbaeck's disease].

Authors:  D Pape; A Hoffmann; D Kohn
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Postoperative clinical outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated medial compartmental osteoarthritis following medial meniscus posterior root tear.

Authors:  Takaaki Hiranaka; Takayuki Furumatsu; Yuki Okazaki; Takaaki Tanaka; Masatsugu Ozawa; Kenji Masuda; Noritaka Seno; Haowei Xue; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2021-08-10

5.  A Retrospective Study of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Functional Outcome and the Incidence of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear in Spontaneous Osteonecrosis of the Knee.

Authors:  Po-Ju Wu; Tsung Yu Lin; Yung Chang Lu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes of Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation for Large Osteonecrotic Lesions of the Femoral Condyle With Residual Normal Cartilage: The Eyeglass Technique.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Yabumoto; Yasuaki Nakagawa; Shogo Mukai
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-10-07

7.  The primary stability of the femoral component in cemented single and twin peg Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under adverse conditions.

Authors:  Johannes Adrian Eckert; Rudi G Bitsch; Robert Sonntag; Tobias Reiner; Martin Schwarze; Sebastian Jaeger
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 5.853

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.