PURPOSE: A number of different genes are known to be inactivated by aberrant hypermethylation in breast cancer, but it is still unknown to what extent these epigenetic alterations differ according to specific breast cancer phenotypes. We sought to determine whether the extent of hypermethylation or defined profiles of gene hypermethylation are associated with biological characteristics of breast cancers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We evaluated methylation status of 12 different genes in a series of 109 invasive breast tumors, representing the ductal, lobular, and mucinous histologic subtypes using methylation-specific PCR. Frequencies of methylation were compared across the recognized histologic classes, and multivariate techniques (latent class analysis, factor analysis, recursive partitioning, and hierarchical clustering) were used to seek patterns of methylation for individual genes that distinguish recognized histologic types of breast cancer or define breast cancer phenotypes on a molecular level. RESULTS: All 109 cases studied have aberrant methylation of multiple genes (3 to 10 genes per case), demonstrating that gene hypermethylation is pervasive in breast cancer. Lobular cancers and mucinous cancers, which often have relatively low levels of chromosomal changes, have higher overall frequencies of hypermethylation than ductal cancers (49% in lobular and mucinous versus 40% in ductal), but there is a relatively unimodal distribution of methylation frequency for all three histologic types. Only one of the individual genes studied, BRCA1, has a variable frequency of methylation that is significantly dependent on histologic pattern of tumor growth, with a higher frequency of methylation in mucinous cancers than ductal or lobular cancers. Although some trends of histology-specific gene methylation were seen, methylation patterns could not definitively classify breast cancers according to histologic type. CONCLUSIONS: Although a more comprehensive hypermethylation profile could potentially be useful for breast cancer classification and understanding the biology of this disease, it appears that the hypermethylation patterns across various forms of breast cancer are less distinct than those between breast cancer and cancers of different tissue origins. Furthermore, the relatively unimodal distribution of methylation frequency for all three histologic types does not support there being a distinct CpG island methylator phenotype for breast cancer.
PURPOSE: A number of different genes are known to be inactivated by aberrant hypermethylation in breast cancer, but it is still unknown to what extent these epigenetic alterations differ according to specific breast cancer phenotypes. We sought to determine whether the extent of hypermethylation or defined profiles of gene hypermethylation are associated with biological characteristics of breast cancers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We evaluated methylation status of 12 different genes in a series of 109 invasive breast tumors, representing the ductal, lobular, and mucinous histologic subtypes using methylation-specific PCR. Frequencies of methylation were compared across the recognized histologic classes, and multivariate techniques (latent class analysis, factor analysis, recursive partitioning, and hierarchical clustering) were used to seek patterns of methylation for individual genes that distinguish recognized histologic types of breast cancer or define breast cancer phenotypes on a molecular level. RESULTS: All 109 cases studied have aberrant methylation of multiple genes (3 to 10 genes per case), demonstrating that gene hypermethylation is pervasive in breast cancer. Lobular cancers and mucinous cancers, which often have relatively low levels of chromosomal changes, have higher overall frequencies of hypermethylation than ductal cancers (49% in lobular and mucinous versus 40% in ductal), but there is a relatively unimodal distribution of methylation frequency for all three histologic types. Only one of the individual genes studied, BRCA1, has a variable frequency of methylation that is significantly dependent on histologic pattern of tumor growth, with a higher frequency of methylation in mucinous cancers than ductal or lobular cancers. Although some trends of histology-specific gene methylation were seen, methylation patterns could not definitively classify breast cancers according to histologic type. CONCLUSIONS: Although a more comprehensive hypermethylation profile could potentially be useful for breast cancer classification and understanding the biology of this disease, it appears that the hypermethylation patterns across various forms of breast cancer are less distinct than those between breast cancer and cancers of different tissue origins. Furthermore, the relatively unimodal distribution of methylation frequency for all three histologic types does not support there being a distinct CpG island methylator phenotype for breast cancer.
Authors: Ji Shin Lee; Mary Jo Fackler; Jae Hyuk Lee; Chan Choi; Min Ho Park; Jung Han Yoon; Zhe Zhang; Saraswati Sukumar Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Diego F Calvisi; Sara Ladu; Alexis Gorden; Miriam Farina; Ju-Seog Lee; Elizabeth A Conner; Insa Schroeder; Valentina M Factor; Snorri S Thorgeirsson Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Young Kyung Bae; Young Ran Shim; Joon Hyuk Choi; Mi Jin Kim; Edward Gabrielson; Soo Jung Lee; Tae Yoon Hwang; Sei One Shin Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2005-08-31 Impact factor: 4.679
Authors: Mercedes Zurita; Pedro C Lara; Rosario del Moral; Blanca Torres; José Luis Linares-Fernández; Sandra Ríos Arrabal; Joaquina Martínez-Galán; Francisco Javier Oliver; José Mariano Ruiz de Almodóvar Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-05-20 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Ilse Van der Auwera; Wayne Yu; Liping Suo; Leander Van Neste; Peter van Dam; Eric A Van Marck; Patrick Pauwels; Peter B Vermeulen; Luc Y Dirix; Steven J Van Laere Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-09-07 Impact factor: 3.240