Literature DB >> 15447886

Sensory-specific satiety in obese and normal-weight women.

Harriëtte M Snoek1, Linda Huntjens, Leo J Van Gemert, Cees De Graaf, Hugo Weenen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sensory-specific satiety has been found to play an important role in food choice and meal termination, and it might be a factor contributing to obesity.
OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that obese and normal-weight people have different sensitivities to sensory-specific satiety for high-fat foods.
DESIGN: Sensory-specific satiety was measured in 21 obese [x body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)): 33.1] and 23 normal-weight (BMI: 22.8) women who were matched for restrained eating behavior, physical activity, age, and smoking behavior. Food intake, appetite ratings, and liking scores before and after an ad libitum lunch were measured. Products differed in fat content and taste (ie, low-fat sweet, low-fat savory, high-fat sweet, and high-fat savory), and the subjects tested all 4 products. In the first study, sandwiches were tested; in the second study, snacks were tested.
RESULTS: Sensory-specific satiety for all products was observed in both subject groups. No significant differences were observed between the obese and normal-weight subjects in either sensory-specific satiety or food intake for any of the products or product categories tested. Taste (sweet or savory) had a significantly (P < 0.05) stronger effect on sensory-specific satiety than did fat content. Appetite ratings strongly decreased after lunch, and appetite for a meal or snack after lunch was significantly higher in obese than in normal-weight subjects, whereas scores before lunch did not differ significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: Obese and normal-weight people do not differ in their sensitivity to sensory-specific satiety, and factors other than fat content have the greatest effect on sensory-specific satiety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15447886     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/80.4.823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  9 in total

1.  "The next mouthful will be the best": influence of prevision of the pleasure on the decision of having a second helping of a just eaten food.

Authors:  Piergiuseppe Vinai; Luisa Vinai; Paolo Vinai; Cecilia Bruno; Stacia Studt; Silvia Cardetti; Donatella Masante; Maurizio Speciale
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Eyes are bigger than the stomach: correlation between body mass index, satiety, and prediction of satiety.

Authors:  P Vinai; D Masante; S Cardetti; N Ferrato; P Vallaur; G Carpegna; S Sassaroli; G M Ruggiero
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.652

3.  Habituation to the pleasure elicited by sweetness in lean and obese women.

Authors:  M Yanina Pepino; Julie A Mennella
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Differential effects of daily snack food intake on the reinforcing value of food in obese and nonobese women.

Authors:  Jennifer L Temple; Alison M Bulkley; Rebecca L Badawy; Nicole Krause; Sarah McCann; Leonard H Epstein
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 5.  Low Calorie Sweetener (LCS) use and energy balance.

Authors:  John C Peters; Jimikaye Beck
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-04-07

6.  Perceptual and Brain Response to Odors Is Associated with Body Mass Index and Postprandial Total Ghrelin Reactivity to a Meal.

Authors:  Xue Sun; Maria G Veldhuizen; Amanda E Babbs; Rajita Sinha; Dana M Small
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 7.  Functionality of fatty acid chemoreception: a potential factor in the development of obesity?

Authors:  Lisa Newman; Rivkeh Haryono; Russell Keast
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Cafeteria diet impairs expression of sensory-specific satiety and stimulus-outcome learning.

Authors:  Amy C Reichelt; Margaret J Morris; R F Westbrook
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-27

Review 9.  Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies.

Authors:  P J Rogers; P S Hogenkamp; C de Graaf; S Higgs; A Lluch; A R Ness; C Penfold; R Perry; P Putz; M R Yeomans; D J Mela
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.095

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.