Literature DB >> 15447800

Surveys: an introduction.

Gordon D Rubenfeld1.   

Abstract

Surveys are a valuable research tool for studying the knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of a study population. This article explores quantitative analyses of written questionnaires as instruments for survey research. Obtaining accurate and precise information from a survey requires minimizing the possibility of bias from inappropriate sampling or a flawed survey instrument, and this article describes strategies to minimize sampling bias by increasing response rates, comparing responders to nonresponders, and identifying the appropriate sampling population. It is crucial that the survey instrument be valid, meaning that it actually measures what the investigator intends it to measure. In developing a valid survey instrument, it can be useful to adapt survey instruments that were developed by other researchers and to conduct extensive pilot-testing of your survey instrument.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15447800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Care        ISSN: 0020-1324            Impact factor:   2.258


  14 in total

Review 1.  A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians.

Authors:  Karen E A Burns; Mark Duffett; Michelle E Kho; Maureen O Meade; Neill K J Adhikari; Tasnim Sinuff; Deborah J Cook
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Perspectives of survivors, families and researchers on key outcomes for research in acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Victor D Dinglas; Caroline M Chessare; Wesley E Davis; Ann Parker; Lisa Aronson Friedman; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Clifton O Bingham; Alison E Turnbull; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  A survey on the practices and capabilities in the management of respiratory failure in South East England.

Authors:  Abhishek Jha; Francesco Vasques; Barnaby Sanderson; Kathleen Daly; Guy Glover; Nicholas Ioannou; Duncan Wyncoll; Peter Sherren; Chris Langrish; Chris Meadows; Andrew Retter; Richard Paul; Nicholas A Barrett; Luigi Camporota
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2020-06-01

4.  Doctors' willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Alan F Merry; Magdi Moharib; Daniel A Devcich; M Louise Webster; Jonathan Ives; Heather Draper
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  A report on case reports.

Authors:  Velayutham Gopikrishna
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2010-10

6.  Psychosocial determinants of physicians' intention to practice euthanasia in palliative care.

Authors:  Mireille Lavoie; Gaston Godin; Lydi-Anne Vézina-Im; Danielle Blondeau; Isabelle Martineau; Louis Roy
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Prospective evaluation of direct approach with a tablet device as a strategy to enhance survey study participant response rate.

Authors:  Melissa J Parker; Asmaa Manan; Sara Urbanski
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-10-31

8.  Pre-hospital advanced airway management by anaesthesiologists: is there still room for improvement?

Authors:  Stephen J M Sollid; Jon Kenneth Heltne; Eldar Søreide; Hans Morten Lossius
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  A UK survey of rehabilitation following critical illness: implementation of NICE Clinical Guidance 83 (CG83) following hospital discharge.

Authors:  Bronwen Connolly; A Douiri; J Steier; J Moxham; L Denehy; N Hart
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Characterising the research profile of the critical care physiotherapy workforce and engagement with critical care research: a UK national survey.

Authors:  Bronwen Connolly; Laura Allum; Michelle Shaw; Natalie Pattison; Paul Dark
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.