Literature DB >> 1543393

Donor hyperglycemia as a minor risk factor and immunologic variables as major risk factors for pancreas allograft loss in a multivariate analysis of a single institution's experience.

P F Gores1, K J Gillingham, D L Dunn, K C Moudry-Munns, J S Najarian, D E Sutherland.   

Abstract

The impact of multiple donor and recipient variables on functional survival of 307 cadaveric pancreas allografts transplanted in 253 recipients at the authors' institution between July 25, 1978 and September 4, 1990 was determined using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Relative risk of graft loss was calculated for all cases as well as for technically successful (TS) ones. Factors with an impact in descending order of significance for TS cases were immunosuppression (RR = 3.9 for double-drug versus triple-drug maintenance, p less than 0.0001); recipient category (RR = 2.4 for pancreas alone versus simultaneous pancreas/kidney, p = 0.009); retransplantation (RR = 1.8 for retransplants versus primary grafts, p = 0.007); donor hyperglycemia (RR = 1.7 for blood glucose greater than or equal to 200 versus less than 200 mg/dL, p = 0.02); human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching (RR = 2.1 for poor versus a good match, p = 0.04). A logistic regression analysis also was performed to determine which factors predisposed to technical failure; none were identified. To make the model as relevant as possible to their current program, the authors analyzed only the bladder-drained cases (n = 221; 1984 to 1990). All patients received triple therapy. Recipient category, retransplantation, donor hyperglycemia, and degree of HLA matching remained as significant risk factors. Construction of estimated survival curves showed that the results of retransplantation were significantly improved, and the penalty incurred by using hyperglycemic donors was partially ameliorated by using well-matched donors. Because preservation times up to 30 hours did not exert an adverse effect on outcome, an argument is made to share pancreata between centers to achieve good matches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1543393      PMCID: PMC1242424          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199203000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  22 in total

1.  A GENERALIZED WILCOXON TEST FOR COMPARING ARBITRARILY SINGLY-CENSORED SAMPLES.

Authors:  E A GEHAN
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  DR matching improves cadaveric pancreas transplant results.

Authors:  S K So; E J Minford; K C Moudry-Munns; K Gillingham; D E Sutherland
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Serum amylase and plasma glucose levels in pancreas cadaver donors: correlation with functional status of the pancreatic graft.

Authors:  U J Hesse; P F Gores; D E Sutherland
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Diagnosis of rejection in recipients of pancreatic grafts with enteric exocrine diversion by monitoring pancreatic juice cytology and amylase excretion.

Authors:  G Tydén; F Reinholt; C Brattström; G Lundgren; H Wilczek; J Bolinder; J Ostman; C G Groth
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  International Pancreas Transplant Registry report.

Authors:  D E Sutherland; K C Moudry-Munns
Journal:  Clin Transpl       Date:  1988

6.  Clinical and experimental experience with pancreaticocystostomy for exocrine pancreatic drainage in pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  H W Sollinger; K Cook; D Kamps; N R Glass; F O Belzer
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 1.066

7.  A 10-year experience with 290 pancreas transplants at a single institution.

Authors:  D E Sutherland; D L Dunn; F C Goetz; W Kennedy; R C Ramsay; M W Steffes; S M Mauer; R Gruessner; K C Moudry-Munns; P Morel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Pancreas transplant results according to the technique of duct management: bladder versus enteric drainage.

Authors:  M Prieto; D E Sutherland; F C Goetz; M E Rosenberg; J S Najarian
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  One hundred pancreas transplants at a single institution.

Authors:  D E Sutherland; F C Goetz; J S Najarian
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Pancreaticoduodenal transplantation with enteric drainage following native total pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis: a case report.

Authors:  R W Gruessner; C Manivel; D L Dunn; D E Sutherland
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.327

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Lessons learned from more than 1,000 pancreas transplants at a single institution.

Authors:  D E Sutherland; R W Gruessner; D L Dunn; A J Matas; A Humar; R Kandaswamy; S M Mauer; W R Kennedy; F C Goetz; R P Robertson; A C Gruessner; J S Najarian
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  R J Stratta; R J Taylor; J L Larsen; K Cushing
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1995-02

Review 3.  Critical care of the potential organ donor.

Authors:  Anna J Dare; Adam S Bartlett; John F Fraser
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 4.  Organ-Protective Intensive Care in Organ Donors.

Authors:  Klaus Hahnenkamp; Klaus Böhler; Heiner Wolters; Karsten Wiebe; Dietmar Schneider; Hartmut H-J Schmidt
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  Duck Jong Han; David Er Sutherland
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 4.519

6.  Brazilian guidelines for the management of brain-dead potential organ donors. The task force of the AMIB, ABTO, BRICNet, and the General Coordination of the National Transplant System.

Authors:  Glauco Adrieno Westphal; Caroline Cabral Robinson; Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti; Anderson Ricardo Roman Gonçalves; Cátia Moreira Guterres; Cassiano Teixeira; Cinara Stein; Cristiano Augusto Franke; Daiana Barbosa da Silva; Daniela Ferreira Salomão Pontes; Diego Silva Leite Nunes; Edson Abdala; Felipe Dal-Pizzol; Fernando Augusto Bozza; Flávia Ribeiro Machado; Joel de Andrade; Luciane Nascimento Cruz; Luciano Cesar Pontes de Azevedo; Miriam Cristine Vahl Machado; Regis Goulart Rosa; Roberto Ceratti Manfro; Rosana Reis Nothen; Suzana Margareth Lobo; Tatiana Helena Rech; Thiago Lisboa; Verônica Colpani; Maicon Falavigna
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.925

7.  Brazilian guidelines for the management of brain-dead potential organ donors. The task force of the Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira, Associação Brasileira de Transplantes de Órgãos, Brazilian Research in Critical Care Network, and the General Coordination of the National Transplant System.

Authors:  Glauco Adrieno Westphal; Caroline Cabral Robinson; Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti; Anderson Ricardo Roman Gonçalves; Cátia Moreira Guterres; Cassiano Teixeira; Cinara Stein; Cristiano Augusto Franke; Daiana Barbosa da Silva; Daniela Ferreira Salomão Pontes; Diego Silva Leite Nunes; Edson Abdala; Felipe Dal-Pizzol; Fernando Augusto Bozza; Flávia Ribeiro Machado; Joel de Andrade; Luciane Nascimento Cruz; Luciano César Pontes Azevedo; Miriam Cristine Vahl Machado; Regis Goulart Rosa; Roberto Ceratti Manfro; Rosana Reis Nothen; Suzana Margareth Lobo; Tatiana Helena Rech; Thiago Costa Lisboa; Verônica Colpani; Maicon Falavigna
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.