Literature DB >> 1541394

How small are the smallest selectable domains of form?

K E Weber1.   

Abstract

Two lines of Drosophila melanogaster from the same base population were selected in opposite directions to produce simultaneous antagonistic changes in two very small (less than 0.2 mm) and closely adjacent (less than 0.3 mm) dimensions within the base of the wing. Wing dimensions near the targeted area became differentiated by large positive and negative percentage differences, while only small homogeneous percentage changes occurred in the remainder of the wing. If very small regions of morphology (less than 100 cells across) can respond to selection almost independently, even in small population samples, then the control of developmental detail must involve many genes, and the diversity of possible outcomes in development and adaptation must be large.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1541394      PMCID: PMC1204854     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  24 in total

1.  The principle of non-equivalence in development.

Authors:  J H Lewis; L Wolpert
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1976-10-21       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  GENETIC AND DEVELOPMENTAL STUDIES OF A QUANTITATIVE CHARACTER.

Authors:  S G SPICKETT
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1963-08-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The Genetics of a Pattern.

Authors:  J M Smith; K C Sondhi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1960-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Comparisons of frogs, humans, and chimpanzees.

Authors:  L M Cherry; S M Case; J G Kunkel; A C Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-04-27       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila.

Authors:  D A Roff; T A Mousseau
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Selection for constancy of score and pattern of secondary vibrissae in Ta/Ta-Ta/Y and Ta/+ mice.

Authors:  P R Pennycuik; J M Rendel
Journal:  Aust J Biol Sci       Date:  1977-08

7.  Developmental constraints and the evolution of vertebrate digit patterns.

Authors:  N Holder
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1983-10-07       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Cell determination boundaries as organizing regions for secondary embryonic fields.

Authors:  H Meinhardt
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  Studies on the nature and function of polygenic loci in Drosophila. I. Comparison of genomes from selection lines.

Authors:  J N Thompson
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Modification of recombination frequency in Drosophila. I. Selection for increased and decreased crossing over.

Authors:  J P Chinnici
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  22 in total

1.  An analysis of polygenes affecting wing shape on chromosome 2 in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K Weber; R Eisman; S Higgins; L Morey; A Patty; M Tausek; Z B Zeng
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Modularity, individuality, and evo-devo in butterfly wings.

Authors:  Patricia Beldade; Kees Koops; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Quantitative-genetic analysis of wing form and bilateral asymmetry in isochromosomal lines of Drosophila subobscura using Procrustes methods.

Authors:  Pedro Fernández Iriarte; Walkiria Céspedes; Mauro Santos
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 4.  Theoretical models of selection and mutation on quantitative traits.

Authors:  Toby Johnson; Nick Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Microarray analysis of replicate populations selected against a wing-shape correlation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kenneth E Weber; Ralph J Greenspan; David R Chicoine; Katia Fiorentino; Mary H Thomas; Theresa L Knight
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Adaptation to different climates results in divergent phenotypic plasticity of wing size and shape in an invasive drosophilid.

Authors:  Roberta Loh; Jean R David; Vincent Debat; Blanche Christine Bitner-Mathá
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 7.  Genetic approaches in comparative and evolutionary physiology.

Authors:  Jay F Storz; Jamie T Bridgham; Scott A Kelly; Theodore Garland
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Why does allometry evolve so slowly?

Authors:  David Houle; Luke T Jones; Ryan Fortune; Jacqueline L Sztepanacz
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

9.  Mutation predicts 40 million years of fly wing evolution.

Authors:  David Houle; Geir H Bolstad; Kim van der Linde; Thomas F Hansen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Genetic architecture of mandible shape in mice: effects of quantitative trait loci analyzed by geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  C P Klingenberg; L J Leamy; E J Routman; J M Cheverud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.