Literature DB >> 1539992

Interaction of ruminal bacteria in the production and utilization of maltooligosaccharides from starch.

M A Cotta1.   

Abstract

The degradation and utilization of starch by three amylolytic and one nonamylolytic species of ruminal bacteria were studied. Pure cultures of Streptococcus bovis JB1, Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens 49, and Bacteroides ruminicola D31d rapidly hydrolyzed starch and maltooligosaccharides accumulated. The major starch hydrolytic products detected in S. bovis cultures were glucose, maltose, maltotriose, and maltotetraose. In addition to these oligosaccharides, B. fibrisolvens cultures produced maltopentaose. The products of starch hydrolysis by B. ruminicola were even more complex, yielding glucose through maltotetraose, maltohexaose, and maltoheptaose but little maltopentaose. Selenomonas ruminantium HD4 grew poorly on starch, digested only a small portion of the available substrate, and generated no detectable oligosaccharides as a result of cultivation in starch containing medium. S. ruminantium was able to grow on a mixture of maltooligosaccharides and utilize those of lower degree (less than 10) of polymerization. A coculture system containing S. ruminantium as a dextrin-utilizing species and each of the three amylolytic bacteria was developed to test whether the products of starch hydrolysis were available for crossfeeding to another ruminal bacterium. Cocultures of S. ruminantium and S. bovis contained large numbers of S. bovis but relatively few S. ruminantium and exhibited little change in the pattern of maltooligosaccharides observed for pure cultures of S. bovis. In contrast, S. ruminantium was able to compete with B. fibrisolvens and B. ruminicola for these growth substrates. When grown with B. fibrisolvens, S. ruminantium grew to high numbers and maltooligosaccharides accumulated to a much lesser degree than in cultures of B. fibrisolvens alone. S. ruminantium-B. ruminicola cultures contained large numbers of both species, and maltooligosaccharides never accumulated in these cocultures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1539992      PMCID: PMC195171          DOI: 10.1128/aem.58.1.48-54.1992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  10 in total

1.  The characteristics of strains of Selenomonas isolated from bovine rumen contents.

Authors:  M P BRYANT
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1956-08       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Rumen Bacterial Competition in Continuous Culture: Streptococcus bovis Versus Megasphaera elsdenii.

Authors:  J B Russell; M A Cotta; D B Dombrowski
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Nutritional interdependence among rumen bacteria during cellulose digestion in vitro.

Authors:  H Miura; M Horiguchi; K Ogimoto; T Matsumoto
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Relationship of lactate dehydrogenase specificity and growth rate to lactate metabolism by Selenomonas ruminantium.

Authors: 
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-12

5.  Interactions between Treponema bryantii and cellulolytic bacteria in the in vitro degradation of straw cellulose.

Authors:  H Kudo; K J Cheng; J W Costerton
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Fermentation of cellodextrins by cellulolytic and noncellulolytic rumen bacteria.

Authors:  J B Russell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Treponema bryantii sp. nov., a rumen spirochete that interacts with cellulolytic bacteria.

Authors:  T B Stanton; E Canale-Parola
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.552

8.  Postprandial trends in estimated ruminal digesta polysaccharides and their relation to changes in bacterial groups and ruminal fluid characteristics.

Authors:  J A Leedle; K Barsuhn; R B Hespell
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Amylolytic activity of selected species of ruminal bacteria.

Authors:  M A Cotta
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Fermentation of xylans by Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens and other ruminal bacteria.

Authors:  R B Hespell; R Wolf; R J Bothast
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.792

  10 in total
  24 in total

1.  The bacteriophages of ruminal prevotellas.

Authors:  J Ambrozic; D Ferme; M Grabnar; M Ravnikar; G Avgustin
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Accumulation of reserve carbohydrate by rumen protozoa and bacteria in competition for glucose.

Authors:  Bethany L Denton; Leanne E Diese; Jeffrey L Firkins; Timothy J Hackmann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Bacterial community composition and fermentation patterns in the rumen of sika deer (Cervus nippon) fed three different diets.

Authors:  Zhipeng Li; André-Denis G Wright; Hanlu Liu; Kun Bao; Tietao Zhang; Kaiying Wang; Xuezhe Cui; Fuhe Yang; Zhigang Zhang; Guangyu Li
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Purification and characterization of the extracellular alpha-amylase from Streptococcus bovis JB1.

Authors:  S N Freer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Molecular monitoring of ruminal prevotellas.

Authors:  K Tepsic; G Avgustin
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.099

6.  Utilization of xylooligosaccharides by selected ruminal bacteria.

Authors:  M A Cotta
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Dietary supplements during the cold season increase rumen microbial abundance and improve rumen epithelium development in Tibetan sheep.

Authors:  Xiao Ping Jing; Quan Hui Peng; Rui Hu; Hua Wei Zou; Hong Ze Wang; Xiao Qiang Yu; Jian Wei Zhou; Allan Degen; Zhi Sheng Wang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Degradation and utilization of xylan by the ruminal bacteria Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens and Selenomonas ruminantium.

Authors:  M A Cotta; R L Zeltwanger
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Regulation and cloning of the gene encoding amylase activity of the ruminal bacterium Streptococcus bovis.

Authors:  M A Cotta; T R Whitehead
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Effect of exogenous glucoamylase inclusion on in vitro fermentation and growth performance of feedlot steers fed a dry-rolled corn-based diet.

Authors:  Alejandro M Pittaluga; Shukun Yu; Wenting Li; Josh C McCann
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.