Literature DB >> 15389687

Two antagonistic gustatory receptor neurons responding to sweet-salty and bitter taste in Drosophila.

Makoto Hiroi1, Nicolas Meunier, Frédéric Marion-Poll, Teiichi Tanimura.   

Abstract

In Drosophila, gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs) occur within hair-like structures called sensilla. Most taste sensilla house four GRNs, which have been named according to their preferred sensitivity to basic stimuli: water (W cell), sugars (S cell), salt at low concentration (L1 cell), and salt at high concentration (L2 cell). Labellar taste sensilla are classified into three types, l-, s-, and i-type, according to their length and location. Of these, l- and s-type labellar sensilla possess these four cells, but most i-type sensilla house only two GRNs. In i-type sensilla, we demonstrate here that the first GRN responds to sugar and to low concentrations of salt (10-50 mM NaCl). The second GRN detects a range of bitter compounds, among which strychnine is the most potent; and also to salt at high concentrations (over 400 mM NaCl). Neither type of GRN responds to water. The detection of feeding stimulants in i-type sensilla appears to be performed by one GRN with the combined properties of S+L1 cells, while the other GRN detects feeding inhibitors in a similar manner to bitter-sensitive L2 cells on the legs. These sensilla thus house two GRNs having an antagonistic effect on behavior, suggesting that the expression of taste receptors is segregated across them accordingly. copyright (c) 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15389687     DOI: 10.1002/neu.20063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurobiol        ISSN: 0022-3034


  60 in total

1.  Evolutionary differences in food preference rely on Gr64e, a receptor for glycerol.

Authors:  Zev Wisotsky; Adriana Medina; Erica Freeman; Anupama Dahanukar
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Cellular identification of water gustatory receptor neurons and their central projection pattern in Drosophila.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Inoshita; Teiichi Tanimura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Engrailed expression in subsets of adult Drosophila sensory neurons: an enhancer-trap study.

Authors:  Jonathan M Blagburn
Journal:  Invert Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-03

4.  Measuring Physiological Responses of Drosophila Sensory Neurons to Lipid Pheromones Using Live Calcium Imaging.

Authors:  Shruti Shankar; Meredith E K Calvert; Joanne Y Yew
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Not all sugars are created equal: some mask aversive tastes better than others in an herbivorous insect.

Authors:  Nicolette Cocco; John I Glendinning
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Function and central projections of gustatory receptor neurons on the antenna of the noctuid moth Spodoptera littoralis.

Authors:  Alexandra Popescu; Louise Couton; Tor-Jørgen Almaas; Jean-Pierre Rospars; Geraldine A Wright; Frédéric Marion-Poll; Sylvia Anton
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  High-NaCl perception in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Georges Alves; Jérémy Sallé; Sylvie Chaudy; Stéphane Dupas; Gérard Manière
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Taste and pheromone perception in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Michelle L Ebbs; Hubert Amrein
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 3.657

9.  Molecular and cellular designs of insect taste receptor system.

Authors:  Kunio Isono; Hiromi Morita
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 5.505

10.  The molecular basis for water taste in Drosophila.

Authors:  Peter Cameron; Makoto Hiroi; John Ngai; Kristin Scott
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.