Literature DB >> 1538687

Comparison of the cigarette brand preferences of adult and teenaged smokers--United States, 1989, and 10 U.S. communities, 1988 and 1990.

.   

Abstract

Tobacco use is the single most preventable cause of death in the United States (1). Approximately three fourths of adult regular smokers tried their first cigarette before the age of 18 years (National Institute on Drug Abuse [NIDA], 1988 NIDA Household Survey, unpublished data); about half had become regular smokers before their 18th birthday (2). Knowing what brands young smokers prefer may suggest what encourages them to smoke and may suggest smoking-prevention or smoking-cessation strategies (3-5). To determine brand preferences of smokers, data were reviewed from CDC's National Center for Health Statistics' 1989 Teenage Attitudes and Practices Survey (TAPS) and the National Cancer Institute surveys of adults in 1988 and 9th-grade students in 1990 in 10 U.S. communities* participating in the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT) evaluation (6). This report examines the findings of these surveys on the cigarette brand preferences of adult and teenaged smokers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1538687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


  9 in total

1.  Adolescent smoking behaviour and cigarette brand preference in Japan.

Authors:  Y Osaki; T Tanihata; T Ohida; M Minowa; K Wada; K Suzuki; A Kaetsu; M Okamoto; T Kishimoto
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Cigarette advertising in magazines for Latinas, White women, and men, 1998--2002: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Senaida Fernandez; Norval Hickman; Elizabeth A Klonoff; Hope Landrine; Kennon Kashima; Bina Parekh; Catherine R Brouillard; Michelle Zolezzi; Jennifer A Jensen; Zorahna Weslowski
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2005-04

Review 3.  Postmarketing surveillance for "modified-risk" tobacco products.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Storefront cigarette advertising differs by community demographic profile.

Authors:  Andrew B Seidenberg; Robert W Caughey; Vaughan W Rees; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

Review 5.  Surveillance methods for identifying, characterizing, and monitoring tobacco products: potential reduced exposure products as an example.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Vaughan W Rees; Gregory N Connolly; Kaila J Norton; David Sweanor; Mark Parascandola; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Developmental cigarette smoke exposure II: Hippocampus proteome and metabolome profiles in adult offspring.

Authors:  Rachel E Neal; Rekha Jagadapillai; Jing Chen; Cindy Webb; Kendall Stocke; Robert M Greene; M Michele Pisano
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.143

7.  Developmental cigarette smoke exposure II: Kidney proteome profile alterations in 6 month old adult offspring.

Authors:  Rachel E Neal; Rekha Jagadapillai; Jing Chen; Cynthia L Webb; Kendall Stocke; Cailtin Gambrell; Robert M Greene; M Michele Pisano
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.143

8.  Developmental cigarette smoke exposure II: Hepatic proteome profiles in 6 month old adult offspring.

Authors:  Rachel E Neal; Jing Chen; Cindy Webb; Kendall Stocke; Caitlin Gambrell; Robert M Greene; M Michele Pisano
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.143

9.  Marketing of menthol cigarettes and consumer perceptions.

Authors:  Joshua Rising; Lori Alexander
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 2.600

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.