PURPOSE: Tobacco manufacturers have targeted youth and ethnic/racial minorities with tailored advertising. Less is known about how characteristics of storefront tobacco advertisements, such as location, position, size, and content, are used to appeal to demographic subgroups. DESIGN: The occurrence and characteristics of storefront cigarette advertising were observed for all licensed tobacco retailers in two defined communities. SETTING: Measures were taken in two Boston, Massachusetts, area urban communities: a low-income, minority community and a high-income, nonminority community. SUBJECTS: No human subjects were involved in this study. MEASURES: Advertisement position (attached or separated from storefront), size (small, medium, or large), mentholation, and price were recorded. Geographic coordinates of tobacco retailers and schools were mapped using ArcGIS 9.2. ANALYSIS: Differences between the communities in advertisement number and characteristics were assessed using bivariate analyses. Logistic regression was used to ascertain the odds of specific advertising features occurring in the low-income/minority community. RESULTS: The low-income/minority community had more tobacco retailers, and advertisements were more likely to be larger, promote menthol products, have a lower mean advertised price, and occur within 1000 feet of a school. CONCLUSION: Storefront cigarette advertising characteristics that increase exposure and promote youth initiation were more prominent in a low-income/minority community. The findings emphasize the need for more effective regulation of storefront tobacco advertising.
PURPOSE:Tobacco manufacturers have targeted youth and ethnic/racial minorities with tailored advertising. Less is known about how characteristics of storefront tobacco advertisements, such as location, position, size, and content, are used to appeal to demographic subgroups. DESIGN: The occurrence and characteristics of storefront cigarette advertising were observed for all licensed tobacco retailers in two defined communities. SETTING: Measures were taken in two Boston, Massachusetts, area urban communities: a low-income, minority community and a high-income, nonminority community. SUBJECTS: No human subjects were involved in this study. MEASURES: Advertisement position (attached or separated from storefront), size (small, medium, or large), mentholation, and price were recorded. Geographic coordinates of tobacco retailers and schools were mapped using ArcGIS 9.2. ANALYSIS: Differences between the communities in advertisement number and characteristics were assessed using bivariate analyses. Logistic regression was used to ascertain the odds of specific advertising features occurring in the low-income/minority community. RESULTS: The low-income/minority community had more tobacco retailers, and advertisements were more likely to be larger, promote menthol products, have a lower mean advertised price, and occur within 1000 feet of a school. CONCLUSION: Storefront cigarette advertising characteristics that increase exposure and promote youth initiation were more prominent in a low-income/minority community. The findings emphasize the need for more effective regulation of storefront tobacco advertising.
Authors: James C Hersey; Shu Wen Ng; James M Nonnemaker; Paul Mowery; Kristin Y Thomas; My-Charllins Vilsaint; Jane A Allen; M Lyndon Haviland Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Joseph R DiFranza; Robert J Wellman; James D Sargent; Michael Weitzman; Bethany J Hipple; Jonathan P Winickoff Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jennifer Cantrell; Jennifer M Kreslake; Ollie Ganz; Jennifer L Pearson; Donna Vallone; Andrew Anesetti-Rothermel; Haijun Xiao; Thomas R Kirchner Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Joseph G L Lee; Lisa Henriksen; Shyanika W Rose; Sarah Moreland-Russell; Kurt M Ribisl Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jennifer Cantrell; Jennifer Kreslake; Ollie Ganz; Jennifer L Pearson; Donna M Vallone; Andrew Anesetti-Rothermel; Haijun Xiao; Thomas R Kirchner Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Montgomry L Burgoon; Thomas Albani; Brittney Keller-Hamilton; Bo Lu; Megan E Roberts; Peter F Craigmile; Christopher Browning; Wenna Xi; Amy K Ferketich Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2019-01-02 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Andrew Anesetti-Rothermel; Peter Herman; Morgane Bennett; Ned English; Jennifer Cantrell; Barbara Schillo; Elizabeth C Hair; Donna M Vallone Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2020-07-09 Impact factor: 1.847