Literature DB >> 1538384

Fate of research studies.

P J Easterbrook1, D R Matthews.   

Abstract

A retrospective survey was conducted of 720 research protocols, approved by the Central Oxford Research Ethics Committee between 1984 and 1987, to determine the fate of research studies from inception. Forty-five per cent were clinical trials, 23% were observational studies and 32% were laboratory-based experimental studies. Further information was obtained on 487 studies, of which 287 (59%) had been completed, 100 (21%) had never started, 58 (12%) had been abandoned or were in abeyance and 42 (9%) were still ongoing, as of May 1990. Forty-three per cent of the original 487 studies were subsequently published or presented. The most frequent reason for not starting a study was failure to obtain funding (40%). The main reason for abandoning a study was difficulty in recruiting study participants (28%). Departure of one of the investigators from the institution and a variety of logistical problems were also common reasons for either not starting or abandoning a study. A thorough review of the pragmatic as well as the scientific aspects of a planned research project is important to minimize the initiation of studies that are unlikely to succeed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Central Oxford Research Ethics Committee; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1538384      PMCID: PMC1294885          DOI: 10.1177/014107689208500206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


  12 in total

1.  Publication bias in clinical research.

Authors:  P J Easterbrook; J A Berlin; R Gopalan; D R Matthews
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Clinical research in general medical journals: a 30-year perspective.

Authors:  R H Fletcher; S W Fletcher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-07-26       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Early evaluation of psychotropic drugs in man. A trial that failed.

Authors:  B Blackwell; M Shepherd
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1967-10-14       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The poor quality of early evaluations of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  L S Cooper; T C Chalmers; M McCally; J Berrier; H S Sacks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-06-10       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Another trial that failed.

Authors:  C C Cook; T D Scannell; M S Lipsedge
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-03-05       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Why do research on research?

Authors:  J Anderson; D C Evered
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-10-04       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The funding of medical research: going up or coming down?

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-01-23

8.  An evaluation of home visiting of patients by physicians in geriatric medicine.

Authors:  M Arcand; J Williamson
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-09-12

9.  Statistics and ethics in medical research: III How large a sample?

Authors:  D G Altman
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-11-15

10.  The epidemiology of the gastrointestinal randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  E Juhl; E Christensen; N Tygstrup
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-01-06       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  40 in total

1.  Cancer patients' and clinicians' opinions on the best time in secondary care to approach patients for recruitment to longitudinal questionnaire-based research.

Authors:  Laura Ashley; Helen Jones; Galina Velikova; Penny Wright
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  BALANCE: a large simple trial of maintenance treatment for bipolar disorder.

Authors:  John R Geddes; Jennifer M Rendell; Guy M Goodwin
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Evelyne Decullier; Véronique Lhéritier; François Chapuis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-20

4.  Use of online recruitment strategies in a randomized trial of cancer survivors.

Authors:  Stephen P Juraschek; Timothy B Plante; Jeanne Charleston; Edgar R Miller; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Lawrence J Appel; Gerald J Jerome; Debra Gayles; Nowella Durkin; Karen White; Arlene Dalcin; Manuel Hermosilla
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 5.  Recruitment challenges of a multicenter randomized controlled varicocelectomy trial.

Authors:  J C Trussell; Gregory M Christman; Dana A Ohl; Richard S Legro; Stephen A Krawetz; Peter J Snyder; Pasquale Patrizio; Alex J Polotsky; Michael P Diamond; Peter R Casson; Christos Coutifaris; Kurt Barnhart; Robert G Brzyski; William D Schlaff; Randall Meacham; David Shin; Tracey Thomas; Meizhuo Zhang; Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Predictors of participant retention in infertility treatment trials.

Authors:  Hongying Kuang; Susan Jin; Tracey Thomas; Lawrence Engmann; Karl R Hansen; Christos Coutifaris; Peter Casson; Gregory Christman; Ruben Alvero; Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; Michael P Diamond; Richard S Legro; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Automated matching software for clinical trials eligibility: measuring efficiency and flexibility.

Authors:  Lynne Penberthy; Richard Brown; Federico Puma; Bassam Dahman
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Use of electronic recruitment methods in a clinical trial of adults with gout.

Authors:  Hailey N Miller; Jeanne Charleston; Beiwen Wu; Kelly Gleason; Karen White; Cheryl R Dennison Himmelfarb; Daniel E Ford; Timothy B Plante; Allan C Gelber; Lawrence J Appel; Edgar R Miller; Stephen P Juraschek
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs in six major journals.

Authors:  Merran Toerien; Sara T Brookes; Chris Metcalfe; Isabel de Salis; Zelda Tomlin; Tim J Peters; Jonathan Sterne; Jenny L Donovan
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review.

Authors:  Patrina H Y Caldwell; Sana Hamilton; Alvin Tan; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.