Literature DB >> 32933342

Use of electronic recruitment methods in a clinical trial of adults with gout.

Hailey N Miller1,2, Jeanne Charleston2,3, Beiwen Wu3, Kelly Gleason1,2, Karen White3, Cheryl R Dennison Himmelfarb1,2, Daniel E Ford2,3, Timothy B Plante4, Allan C Gelber3,5, Lawrence J Appel2,3,5, Edgar R Miller2,3,5, Stephen P Juraschek6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Electronic-based recruitment methods are increasingly utilized in clinical trials to recruit and enroll research participants. The cost-effectiveness of electronic-based methods and impact on sample generalizability is unknown. We compared recruitment yields, cost-effectiveness, and demographic characteristics across several electronic and traditional recruitment methods.
METHODS: We analyzed data from the diet gout trial recruitment campaign. The diet gout trial was a randomized, controlled, cross-over trial that examined the effects of a dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH)-like diet on uric acid levels in adults with gout. We used four electronic medical record and four non-electronic medical record-based recruitment methods to identify and recruit potentially eligible participants. We calculated the response rate, screening visit completion rate, and randomization rate for each method. We also determined cost per response, the screening, and randomization for each method. Finally, we compared the demographic characteristics among individuals who completed the screening visit by recruitment method.
RESULTS: Of the 294 adults who responded to the recruitment campaign, 51% were identified from electronic medical record-based methods. Patient portal messaging, an electronic medical record-based method, resulted in the highest response rate (4%), screening visit completion rate (37%), and randomization rate (21%) among these eight methods. Electronic medical record-based methods ($60) were more cost-effective per response than non-electronic medical record-based methods ($107). Electronic-based methods, including patient portal messaging and Facebook, had the highest proportion of White individuals screened (52% and 60%). Direct mail to non-active patient portal increased enrollment of traditionally under-represented groups, including both women and African Americans.
CONCLUSION: An electronic medical record-based recruitment strategy that utilized the electronic medical record for participant identification and postal mailing for participant outreach was cost-effective and increased participation of under-represented groups. This hybrid strategy represents a promising approach to improve the timely execution and broad generalizability of future clinical trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Recruitment methods; clinical trials; disparities; electronic medical records; randomized control trial

Year:  2020        PMID: 32933342      PMCID: PMC7878277          DOI: 10.1177/1740774520956969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  26 in total

1.  Four paradigms of clinical research and research oversight.

Authors:  Ezekiel J Emanuel; Christine Grady
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Electronic medical record-based cohort selection and direct-to-patient, targeted recruitment: early efficacy and lessons learned.

Authors:  Hailey N Miller; Kelly T Gleason; Stephen P Juraschek; Timothy B Plante; Cassie Lewis-Land; Bonnie Woods; Lawrence J Appel; Daniel E Ford; Cheryl R Dennison Himmelfarb
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Underrepresentation of women, elderly patients, and racial minorities in the randomized trials used for cardiovascular guidelines.

Authors:  Muhammad Rizwan Sardar; Marwan Badri; Catherine T Prince; Jonathan Seltzer; Peter R Kowey
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Effectiveness of social media (Facebook), targeted mailing, and in-person solicitation for the recruitment of young adult in a diabetes self-management clinical trial.

Authors:  Sarah-Jeanne Salvy; Kristine Carandang; Cheryl Lp Vigen; Alyssa Concha-Chavez; Paola A Sequeira; Jeanine Blanchard; Jesus Diaz; Jennifer Raymond; Elizabeth A Pyatak
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Electronic health records as a tool for recruitment of participants' clinical effectiveness research: lessons learned from tobacco cessation.

Authors:  David Fraser; Bruce A Christiansen; Robert Adsit; Timothy B Baker; Michael C Fiore
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Recruiting for a pragmatic trial using the electronic health record and patient portal: successes and lessons learned.

Authors:  Emily Pfaff; Adam Lee; Robert Bradford; Jinhee Pae; Clarence Potter; Paul Blue; Patricia Knoepp; Kristie Thompson; Christianne L Roumie; David Crenshaw; Remy Servis; Darren A DeWalt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Incident gout in women and association with obesity in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.

Authors:  Janet W Maynard; Mara A McAdams DeMarco; Alan N Baer; Anna Köttgen; Aaron R Folsom; Josef Coresh; Allan C Gelber
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 8.  A review of approaches to identifying patient phenotype cohorts using electronic health records.

Authors:  Chaitanya Shivade; Preethi Raghavan; Eric Fosler-Lussier; Peter J Embi; Noemie Elhadad; Stephen B Johnson; Albert M Lai
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Effectiveness and cost of recruiting healthy volunteers for clinical research studies using an electronic patient portal: A randomized study.

Authors:  Mary H Samuels; Robert Schuff; Peter Beninato; Adriel Gorsuch; James Dursch; Sarah Egan; Bridget Adams; Kate F Hollis; Rachel Navarro; Timothy E Burdick
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-12

Review 10.  The Use of Facebook in Recruiting Participants for Health Research Purposes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christopher Whitaker; Sharon Stevelink; Nicola Fear
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  8 in total

1.  Centralized registry for COVID-19 research recruitment: Design, development, implementation, and preliminary results.

Authors:  Anna Peeler; Hailey Miller; Oluwabunmi Ogungbe; Cassia Lewis Land; Liz Martinez; Monica Guerrero Vazquez; Scott Carey; Sumati Murli; Megan Singleton; Cyd Lacanienta; Kelly Gleason; Daniel Ford; Cheryl R Himmelfarb
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-07-14

2.  The Nourish Protocol: A digital health randomized controlled trial to promote the DASH eating pattern among adults with hypertension.

Authors:  Hailey N Miller; Miriam B Berger; Sandy Askew; Melissa C Kay; Christina M Hopkins; Meghana Sai Iragavarapu; Mia de Leon; Megan Freed; Cherie N Barnes; Qing Yang; Crystal C Tyson; Laura P Svetkey; Gary G Bennett; Dori M Steinberg
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 2.261

3.  A/B design testing of a clinical trial recruitment website: A pilot study to enhance the enrollment of older adults.

Authors:  Hailey N Miller; Timothy B Plante; Kelly T Gleason; Jeanne Charleston; Christine M Mitchell; Edgar R Miller; Lawrence J Appel; Stephen P Juraschek
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 2.261

4.  Strategies and lessons learned from a longitudinal study to maximize recruitment in the midst of a global pandemic.

Authors:  Jamie R Pogue; Briget M da Graca; Maris Adams; Christine Kruegar; Rupande Patel; Monica Bennett; Mark B Powers; Ann Marie Warren
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2022-02-10

5.  Attitudes and personal beliefs about the COVID-19 vaccine among people with COVID-19: a mixed-methods analysis.

Authors:  Monica M Bennett; Megan Douglas; Briget da Graca; Katherine Sanchez; Mark B Powers; Ann Marie Warren
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 4.135

6.  Influence of Social and Cultural Factors on the Decision to Consent for Monoclonal Antibody Treatment among High-Risk Patients with Mild-Moderate COVID-19.

Authors:  Dennis M Bierle; Ravindra Ganesh; Caroline G Wilker; Sara N Hanson; Darcie E Moehnke; Tammy A Jackson; Priya Ramar; Jordan K Rosedahl; Lindsey M Philpot; Raymund R Razonable
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

7.  A Randomized Pilot Study of DASH Patterned Groceries on Serum Urate in Individuals with Gout.

Authors:  Stephen P Juraschek; Edgar R Miller; Beiwen Wu; Karen White; Jeanne Charleston; Allan C Gelber; Sharan K Rai; Kathryn A Carson; Lawrence J Appel; Hyon K Choi
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 8.  Integrating special and underserved populations in translational research: Environmental scan of adaptive capacity and preparedness of Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program hubs.

Authors:  Verónica Hoyo; Raj C Shah; Gaurav Dave; Boris B Volkov
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-06-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.