Literature DB >> 1538359

Patients' acceptance of monitoring fetal movement. A randomized comparison of charting techniques.

C V Smith1, S A Davis, W F Rayburn.   

Abstract

An active fetus is reassuring to both the woman and her obstetrician. Numerous techniques of charting fetal movement have been shown to assist the clinician in caring for the high-risk patient. Patients' compliance with daily monitoring is an important clinical issue, and little information exists on the fetal movement record most preferred by the patient. A comparative study evaluated patients' acceptance of three commonly used charts. The 85 enrollees were given the different charts in a random manner and questioned at the next office visit. All the patients expressed approval of the concept and a lack of anxiety about such monitoring, complied with our instructions and returned the completed records. The neonatal outcomes were favorable with all the charting techniques in our antenatal fetal surveillance plan. The "count-to-10" method was rated most preferred in 95.3% of the cases. The reasons cited included convenience and less time needed to complete the recording. The mean time to complete this record was 19.7 +/- 22.9 minutes rather than one or more hours, as with the other charting methods. The results of this randomized investigation show the simple and rapid count-to-10 method to be the most acceptable charting technique to our patients for monitoring fetal movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1538359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  5 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of fetal movement counting by mother and the optimal recording duration.

Authors:  Mahin Kamalifard; Shamsi Abbasalizadeh; Morteza Ghojazadeh; Fatemeh Ghatreh Samani; Leila Rabiei
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2013-06-01

Review 2.  Professional and patient perspectives of NICE guidelines to abandon maternal monitoring of fetal movements.

Authors:  Ian Hill-Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Reduced fetal movements at term, low-risk pregnancies: is it associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes? Ten years of experience from a single tertiary center.

Authors:  Michal Levy; Michal Kovo; Giulia Barda; Ohad Gluck; Liron Koren; Jacob Bar; Eran Weiner
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 4.  Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing.

Authors:  Lindeka Mangesi; G Justus Hofmeyr; Valerie Smith; Rebecca M D Smyth
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-10-15

5.  Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines - a clinical quality improvement.

Authors:  Julie Victoria Holm Tveit; Eli Saastad; Babill Stray-Pedersen; Per E Børdahl; Vicki Flenady; Ruth Fretts; J Frederik Frøen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.